Skip to main content

Whither "we the people"? Have we Indians really 'done away' with our Constitution?

Sworn in, resigned: CM, dy CM, Maharashtra: Devendra Fadnavis with Ajit Pawar
By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
Exactly 70 years ago on November 26, 1949, the Constituent Assembly of India adopted and gave to “we, the people” a landmark Constitution. The Constitution of India is the sacred book of every Indian citizen; it is a bulwark of fundamental rights and directive principles, which are a prerequisite for any healthy democracy.
The Preamble, with its emphasis on justice, liberty, equality and fraternity and its commitment to India being and remaining a “sovereign socialist secular democratic republic” spells out the vision and the intrinsic character of the Constitution. The Constitution of India with its minute details is undoubtedly a unique one.
Thanks to the vision of women and men of the Constituent Assembly, we can take genuine pride in a Constitution which is forward-looking and all-embracing and which respects the pluralistic fabric of the country.
Today, after several years of having and being guided by a masterpiece, unbelievable events have been unfolding in India. The past five years (up to May 2019) have seen several of them; and ever since, this regime seized the reins of power for a second term (after, what is believed by many, a fraudulent election), a sizeable section of the population is simply dumbstruck. The one question that most thinking citizens of India are asking today is, “have we really done away with our Constitution?”
What took place in the Raj Bhavan of Maharashtra in the wee hours of Saturday, November 23, 2019, provides a clear answer: “yes, we seem to have done away with the Constitution!” How else can one explain the way, the President threw all Constitutional propriety to the wind and revoked without a Cabinet meeting and a resolution President’s rule in Maharashtra? In a matter of time, the Governor of the State swore in a usurper as the next Chief Minister (CM) of the State.
How does one explain this ‘tearing and unprecedented hurry’ – even if there are some so-called legitimate provisions in extreme cases? The support for this nefarious act came from a turn-coat of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), who has several cases of corruption against him, and with a commitment by the Maharashtra CM, to put in jail! (strangely, in just about 24 hours, the State’s Anti-Corruption Bureau “closes” the corruption cases against him.)
The Maharashtra case came up in the Supreme Court on Monday, and on expected lines, the highest Court of the land does not think that, it is in their own interest and impartiality, they should at least have restrained the ‘impostor’ CM from functioning, until one or the other combines proves its majority on the floor of the house.
So, if the President, the Governor and even the judiciary, are not serious about Constitutional basics, to whom do “we the people” go to? It is not that one did not see or read the writing on the wall. It has been coming slowly but surely.
There are several instances when the spirit and letter of the Constitution has not been adhered too. But this most recent out of Maharashtra is, on several counts, the proverbial “last straw”. The moot question we need to ask ourselves at this juncture is, do we have the courage to stop the fascists, who are not merely tearing the Constitution to shreds, but are doing all they can to destroy the very idea of India and its pluralistic fabric.
The National Register of Citizens (NRC), as announced by the Union Home Minister, is again blatantly violative of the Constitution. NRC, together with the Citizenship Amendment Bill, assuring citizenship to all undocumented persons, except those of the Muslim faith, risks tearing the country apart, reopening the wounds of Partition, and ultimately destroying the secular and democratic tenets of the Constitution. The country today stands at the brink of catastrophic human suffering and injustice, if the government as it plans to do, begins implementing it nation-wide.
Many subtle and direct efforts are being made to tamper with the Constitution, to negate its essence and even to delete core dimensions like the words ‘secular’ and ‘socialism’ which are deeply interwoven into the pluralistic fabric of Indian society. The current BJP/RSS combine, including some of their ministers and leading functionaries, have often gone on record saying that once they have the pre-requisite numbers in Parliament, they will have no qualms of conscience to change fundamentals of the Constitution like that of ‘secularism’ and equal rights for all.
There are consistent proclamations for the establishment of a ‘Hindu State’ by 2020; the annihilation of the minorities, particularly the Muslims and Christians; ‘lynching’ of minorities is the ‘new normal’. There is talk of a Common Civil Code, of a national anti-conversion law and of abrogating the rights of minorities.
In October 2018, in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling to allow young women entry into the Sabrimala Temple, BJP national president Amit Shah not merely questioned the judgement but in fact defended the practice of keeping women out. The ‘spirit’ of what Amit Shah said is practiced in toto: Even in this year’s pilgrimage his writ ran large and no women below a certain age were being allowed. The Supreme Court judgement on Ayodhya is certainly skewed pandering to the sentiments of the Hindutva regime.
Dr BR Ambedkar
Writing on the recent developments in Kashmir, Bharat Bhushan says:
“The revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir, dividing it into two centrally governed provinces and the military clamp down have tipped the balance against the Modi regime. The world can see that the asymmetric federalism which was the basis of the Indian Union’s strength has been junked for a unitary vision. The government’s and pliant media’s celebration of “normalcy” in Kashmir Valley is nothing but self-deluding propaganda. The fact is that the international community is perturbed with the developments in Kashmir, especially the communication restrictions and the continued incarceration of the state’s political leadership”.
In several key cases, the judiciary, seems to be abdicating its fundamental responsibility of safeguarding the Constitution. There have been some landmark judgements. In January 2018, four seniors most judges of the Supreme Court (including Justice Ranjan Gogoi, the recently retired Chief Justice of India) held an unprecedented Press Conference asserting that unless things are set in order and that the Government stops interfering in the judiciary, “democracy will not survive in the country!”
That the Government has been interfering in the working of the judiciary is without doubt. Bhushan adds:
“The rule of law and impartial judiciary that India prided itself on have also come under question. In a stinging indictment, 'The Washington Post' in a recent report remarked that 'BJP partisans increasingly dominate the courts'. This has been evident to Indians for quite some time. One only has to glance at the global media headlines on the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya verdict to fathom how the Indian judiciary is being viewed”.
The regime has spared no efforts to destroy the independence and the autonomous functioning of several Constitutional and statutory bodies. The Election Commission of India is today obviously a pawn. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) have become ‘caged parrots'.
The Reserve Banking of India (RBI) is browbeaten to bend backwards to cater to the whims and fancies of a Government that has sent the country into an economic spiral downwards! Media, the fourth pillar of a vibrant democracy, has been made impotent. Only a handful of those in the electronic and print media will dare take on the Government today. Other important bodies, like the Information Commission, have been made toothless and filled with their pliable henchmen!
Seventy years ago, when giving us the Constitution Dr BR Ambedkar, the father of our Constituent Assembly, said:
“Will history repeat itself? It is this thought, which fills me with anxiety. This anxiety is deepened by the realisation of the fact that in addition to our old enemies in the form of castes and creeds, we are going to have many political parties with diverse and opposing political creeds. Will Indians place the country above their creed or above their country? I do not know, but this much is certain that if the parties place creed above country, our independence will be put in jeopardy a second time and probably be lost forever. This eventuality we all must resolutely guard against. We must be determined to defend our independence with the last drop of our blood!”
And he went on to conclude:
“If we wish to preserve the Constitution in which we have sought to enshrine the principle of Government of the people, for the people and by the people, let us resolve not to be tardy in the recognition of the evils that lie across our path and which induce people to prefer Government for the people to Government by the people, nor to be weak in our initiative to remove them. That is the only way to serve the country. I know of no better”.
Words of wisdom and very prophetic indeed! Today, on the Constitution Day, as we remember our freedom fighters and the founding fathers of our nation, we need to resolve that we will do all we can to fight the fascist and fundamental forces that are today destroying the sanctity of our Constitution. In a show of hollowness and hypocrisy, they will attempt to clothe their vile acts with empty platitudes, in farcical ceremonies today.
However, for us, “we the people of India”, enough is enough! We will stop taking things lying down; the Constitution is sacred to us and in the words of Ambedkar “we are determined to defend it with the last drop of our blood!
---
*Human rights & peace activist/writer. Contact: cedricprakash@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.