Skip to main content

Modi shouldn't have gone to negotiate RCEP in Bangkok: Civil society network NAPM

By A Representative
Civil rights network, the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has welcomed the news from Bangkok that India is holding up the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), saying, it is due mainly to the "awareness created and pressure mounted by farmers' organisations, people's movements, conscientious experts and concerned citizens."
It said, "Rather than waking up at the eleventh hour the Modi Government should not have participated in the negotiations in the first place. The 16-nation free trade agreement poses a grievous threat to the lives and livelihoods of farmers, milk producers, workers, and toilers who sustain and nurture India's economy."
According to NAPM, while industry associations, trade bodies and the corporate interests behind them would support such an agreement, "The moot point is free trade agreements are in no way 'free' for farmers, Adivasis, Dalits, workers and others who live off their sweat and blood."
In a statement signed by senior activists, NAPM said, "It is a myth to believe that the 'rising tide of trade will lift all boats' or that trickle down works. Every serious research study and report has only shown the wealth gap is continuously increasing and wealth is only sucked upwards."
Suspecting that to "the last minute wake up of the Modi government, given its track record of working overtime for corporate interests, may only be a ploy for damage control", NAPM said, "If the government is really serious it should hold consultations with people and organisations whose lives and livelihoods will be affected."
Free trade agreements are in no way 'free' for farmers, Adivasis, Dalits, workers and others who live off their sweat and blood
Apprehending that, at a time when the economy is on the downturn leading joblessness, the RCEP negotiations under the pressure of China and other countries will flood the Indian market, NAPM said, it will also "impact the small and marginal businesses and manufacturers."
Pointing out that farmers' groups and peoples movements held protest demonstrations across the country at nearly 500 places asking the Government of India (GoI) to desist from signing "anti-people RCEP and withdraw from it completely", it urged the government to "listen and undertake steps to revive the economy."
Those who have signed the statement include Medha Patkar of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, Aruna Roy of the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information, Dr Binayak Sen of the Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties, Prafulla Samantara of the Lok Shakti Abhiyan, Meera Sanghamitra of the NAPM Telangana-Andhra Pradesh, and Sandeep Pandey of the Socialist Party (India).

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.
2 comments
»

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...
2 comments
»

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.
Post a Comment
»