Skip to main content

Apex court asks chief ministers of 4 states, Centre to 'review' Narmada submergence

By Our Representative
The Supreme Court has refused to accept the report of the Sardar Sarovar Reservoir Regulation Committee dated October 14, 2019, submitted by the Union of India and the Narmada Control Authority (NCA). 
The apex court refusal came after senior counsel Sanjay Parikh, appearing for the Sardar Sarovar dam affected persons, argued that the committee "illegally" decided on accelerated filling of water in the dam's reservoir, leading to submergence of 176 villages in the Narmada valley.
The court, following a hearing on the matter on October 24, directed that the Review Committee, consisting of four chief ministers of the beneficiary states Gujarat, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, and the Union minister of water resources, should meet and decide the question of water level in the Sardar Sarovar dam as well as the question of rehabilitation "expeditiously".
The apex court also gave petitioners Madan Singh and others, who are backed by the anti-dam Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), liberty to submit a memorandum before the Review Committee on the matter.
NBA said in a communique, the petitioners argued that they were affected by illegal raising of water level to the full reservoir level (FRL), 138.68 metres, in violation of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) Award and directions of the Supreme Court that "no submergence should take place till rehabilitation is complete in all respects".
The petitioners argued, due to the accelerated filling of the reservoir, grave devastation took place in 176 villages of Madhya Pradesh
In the responses filed by the State of Gujarat, the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) and the Union of India, said NBA, "it clearly came out that the accelerated filling of reservoir took place on September 15, 2019 in 24 hours, contrary to the guidelines of Central Water Commission that the filling up to FRL should be done cautiously." 
Yet, this was done "ahead of the celebration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s birthday on September 17, 2019."
The petitioners argued, due to the accelerated filling of the reservoir, "grave devastation" took place in 176 villages of Madhya Pradesh, and thousands of families of farmers and agricultural labourers, including women and children had to "run to save their lives", and only some of them have been given a temporary shelter in tin sheds.
It said, thousands of others are still suffering due to loss of livelihood, and are without food, water and shelter. Thousands of cattle are without fodder since the pastures in the original villages are submerged and alternatives have not been provided at the resettlement sites.
Tushar Mehta, solicitor general, appeared for Union of India, NCA and the State of Gujarat. NBA said, he did this "in spite of the fact that all the three parties are independent, and NCA especially is supposed to be an interstate impartial authority to guide and direct states whithin the legal framework."

Comments

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”