Skip to main content

Bilkis Bano, Ishrat Jahan: How Gujarat BJP rulers 'dragged' cases in top courts

Bilkis Bano
By RK Misra*
Seventeen years after the incident and six months after the apex court ordered relief for the victim, the BJP government in Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s home state of Gujarat figured in a callous disregard for compliance. Successive BJP governments in Gujarat have dragged their feet, particularly in matters relating to the minority community, even when the highest court of the land has unequivocally ruled it’s mind.
This was once again brought into sharp focus on September 30, 2019 when the Supreme Court directed the Gujarat government to implement within two weeks an order which it had given almost six months ago in the case of Bilkis Bano, a gangrape victim of the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat.
On April 23, 2019, a bench headed by Chief justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising judges Deepak Gupta and Sanjeev Khanna had ordered the Gujarat government to pay Rs 50 lakh as payment to Bilkis Bano, provide government job and adequate accommodation.
Five months later, Bilkis was back before the apex court through her advocate Shobha Gupta with a contempt petition that stated that despite the order the Gujarat government had not provided anything to her.
The reply by solicitor general Tushar Mehta that the compensation amount of Rs 50 lakh had not been provided for in the victim compensation scheme of Gujarat and more over that the state "proposed to file" a review plea did not cut ice with the bench headed by Chief Justice Gogoi and comprising justices SA Bobde and SA Nazeer. Mehta sought more time to provide a job for Bilkis but the judges were unrelenting.
Even the time of two weeks is not needed, the bench stated. Mehta had to give an undertaking to the court that their order would be complied within two weeks.
Bilkis was 19 years old and five months pregnant when her family was attacked at Randhikpur village in Dahod district of Gujarat as they were trying to escape rioters. She was gang-raped and 14 members of her family including her two year old child whose head was smashed against a rock, were killed. She survived only because the rioters left her for dead. Though married, she had been living a nomadic existence , being forced to change 25 houses in a span of 15 years due to threats by convicts in the case who were out on parole.
Vivek Dube, who later retired as Andhra Pradesh police chief in 2015, was the first head of the CBI crime team which took charge of the case under Supreme Court orders in December 2003. His investigations led a special court to sentence 11 men for raping Bilkis and killing her family members but acquitted seven people. CBI approached the Bombay High Court for more stringent punishment while the convicted sought quashing of the special court order.
The High Court in May 2017 convicted the seven as well. The convicted then approached the Supreme Court but their appeals were dismissed. Among those convicted by the High Court in the case were five policemen and two doctors who had botched up the initial investigation.
Interestingly, of the five cops, four -- a deputy superintendent of police, two inspectors and a constable -- had retired and the fifth a deputy commissioner of police, RS Bhagora was dismissed from service only a day before his retirement on May 30, this year.
Despite the fact that his name figured in the Bilkis Banu case investigations by CBI, Bhagora, who was a state cadre officer, was promoted to IPS cadre in 2006 and until the day of his dismissal was enjoying the key posting of deputy commissioner of police (traffic) in Ahmedabad.
The Supreme Court had on July 10, 2017 dismissed the appeals by Bhagora and other cops stating that there was clear-cut evidence against them. And despite this, the government waited till virtually his last day in service to dismiss him, the apex court order for action against the errant officer notwithstanding.
Ishrat's mother

Ishrat Jahan case

While Bilkis, battling an intransigent state administration, has stoically roughed it out for almost 17 years and managed to secure justice, the patience of an elderly mother fighting for justice for her dead daughter, Ishrat Jahan, killed in an alleged fake encounter in Ahmedabad, has run aground.
On May 1, Shamima Kauser, the mother of Ishrat Jahan, submitted a letter to the CBI court in Ahmedabad stating that the slow and tiring pace of the wheels of justice have sapped her strength, and in frustration and despair she has decided she will not contest the case any further.
College student Ishrat Jahan and three others -- Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar -- were killed on the outskirts of Ahmedabad by a team of the Ahmedabad crime branch then led by DG Vanzara on June 15, 2004 in what was later termed as a fake encounter. The cops claimed that they were part of a Lashkar-e-Toiba terror module out to kill then chief minister Narendra Modi.
Shamima’s letter to CBI of September 18 conveys that she no longer intends to remain a party to the judicial proceedings. The letter is a sad commentary on the prevailing state of affairs:
”I am heart-broken and my spirit shattered at the perpetuation of this culture of impunity. I have thus instructed my counsel Vrinda Grover that I have lost the will to fight.
"The long drawn and labyrinthine judicial process has exhausted and frustrated me. I had never imagined seeking truth and justice could be such an uphill, arduous and life consuming task and I now feel helpless and hopeless. All the accused cops are out on bail and some have even been reinstated in service despite facing charges of murder and conspiracy”.
She has also mentioned about the Gujarat government’s refusal to sanction the trial of the accused and said that "it is the job of CBI to prosecute the 11 accused officers. This culture of impunity needs to be eradicated to protect vulnerable citizens." Shamima’s letter was delivered during proceedings on the discharge applications filed by four police officers.
This case is a classic example of how the shifting pendulum of political power brings about corresponding changes in key cases with such overtones.
Metropolitan magistrate SP Tamang, who submitted an enquiry report that said the encounter was fake, was subjected to an enquiry on his conduct on orders from the Gujarat High Court which was, however, set aside later by the apex court. Satish Verma , a senior Gujarat cadre IPS officer who was appointed to a SIT on the encounter was shunted to the North-East after he too revealed that the encounter was fake.
On the other hand, the accused officers in the case close to BJP have had the benefit of the government’s largesse. Retired IPS DG Vanzara and NK Amin were discharged from it after the Gujarat government refused sanction to prosecute them. CBI made it known that it would not challenge the order.
Earlier in February 2018, senior police officer and former Gujarat DGP PP Pandey was discharged from the case, while the discharge plea of four remaining senior police officers has been moved.
“I know for a fact that my daughter was killed in a premeditated manner. I have been up against some very powerful police officers who enjoy the patronage of the powers that be”, Shamima said.
Nothing sadder or truer could be said.
---
*Senior journalist based in Gujarat. Blog:  http://wordsmithsandnewsplumbers.blogspot.com/

Comments

Jagdish Patel said…
It is shocking to know this. Very alarming situation. Judiciary is not unbiased and free. Very difficult to get justtice

TRENDING

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

Church in India 'seems to have lost' moral compass of unequivocal support to the poor

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*
In 2017, Pope Francis dedicated a special day, to be observed by the Universal Church, every year, as the ‘World Day of the Poor’. This year it will be observed on November 17 on the theme ‘The hope of the poor shall not perish for ever’; in a message for the day Pope Francis says:

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”