Skip to main content

Dalit literature festival ends with "pledge" to create a new literary world

By A Representative
The two-day Dalit Literature Festuval at Kirori Mal College, Delhi University, has concluded with the slogan 'A new world of literature is possible'. The issues discussed included: past, present and future of Dalit literature; challenges of Dalit literature movement; contradiction between Dalit literature and Marxist literature; participation of Dalit and tribal women in literature; female movement in Dalit literature; tribal and nomadic communities in literature, society and culture; minorities’ and literature; question of identity in Dalit literature; and Dalit literature in Indian languages.
During these discussions on the second day, Suraj Bahadur Thapa, while questioning the simplification of today's academic system, said, Marxists linked issues to class struggle, while Dr BR Ambedkar focused on class, caste and gender. Abdul Bismillah talked of roots of discrimination in languages, pointing towards how Urdu was considered a language of Muslims while Hindi or Sanskrit as language of Hindus.
“Adivasis and Dalits are not being allowed struggle for water and forest. The government is still occupying our lands and forests. In the Pataldhari movement, we can see how our self-government efforts are being crushed, and the government is refusing to accept even the Constitution. But we will fight together and will also bring the voice to society on the right path, by voicing your voice vocally through literature”, Nirmala Putul said.
Films on Dalit history and their struggles were screened during the festival, in which 12 publishers attended the book fair, which took placed simultaneously. Other highlights of the festival included poetry recitation, discussion on how investigation was directed against Dalit writers and activists for the Bhima Koregaon violence early last year.
In the two-day Dalit Literature Festival was attended, among others, by well-known social activist Medha Patkar, and writers from different parts of the country, including Laxman Gaikwad (Marathi), Mohandas Naimishrai and Balisingh Chima (Uttarakhand), Nirmala Putul (Jharkhand), Abdul Bismillah and Chauryaram Yadav (Banaras), Jai Prakash Sharmali Mustafa Khan and Jayashree (Thiruvananthapuram), (Trivandrum), Harish Mangalam and Haresh Parmar (Gujarati), Suraj Bahadur Thapa and Hare Prakash Upadhyay (Lucknow), Krantipal Singh, Balvir Madhopuri, Kesaram and Mohan Tyagi (Punjabi), and others.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.