Skip to main content

Muslims must follow Maulana Azad, who opposed the idea of separate homeland, and not Haseeb, Owaisi, Azam & Co

By Firoz Bakht Ahmed*

As far as Muslims of India are concerned, two recent incidents not only alarmed and hurt the nation but let this patriotic community down. The most recent is the diatribe of Maulana Haseeb Siddiqui of Deoband’s Muslim Bank who openly declared the opposition to unite against Modi and vote for the so-called secular party.
The other ghastly incident was the adamancy of the AMU (Aligarh Muslim University) students not to remove Jinnah’s photograph from their students’ union office. Had these people followed Bharat Ratna Maulana Abul Kalam Azad’s path of interfaith concord and the lesson of gelling Hindus and Muslims for the larger good of India, they would not have done this. Unfortunately, the atmosphere is charged unnecessarily on behalf of both communities on petty issues, sometimes taking the form of communal riots.

Dividing on religious lines

Whatever Maulana Haseeb stated just before the Kairana, UP election, or the transgression on the part of the AMU students, was not only in bad taste but against the very roots of Islam, patriotism and nationalism. Haseeb’s statement that Muslims must vote for Tabassum of Congress and not for Mriganka of BJP, smacked of polarized and communal bias. It is statements like these that give rise to ill-fated mishaps like, Akhlaq, Pehlu Khan, Junaid and others. Muslims must sideline opportunists like Haseeb and Co.
Truth is that this kind of Muslim leadership has misled the unassuming community. Indian Muslims have been victim to an irresponsible leadership which has been bent upon keeping the community in subjugation by concentrating on emotionally charged and sensitive issues. During every election, it has been proved that all of them turn as power-brokers indulging in pernicious vote-bank manipulations acquiring state patronage themselves and subjecting and finally leaving the community with a begging bowl at the mercy of God.
These so-called Muslim representatives have ruined their followers emotionally, socially and educationally. Has anyone heard an iota of grudge from the Sikh, Christian or Parsi communities against their leaders? Never! Why? They are sincere not only to their community but even people outside it. More often then, not ours are interested in feathering their own nests owing to their ambitions solely materialist while their followers are being pushed to the dark bottomless hell of ignorance owing to the obscurantist attitude of their netas who think they are accountable to none.

Cajoled Muslim community

This is not all; battered by the populist rhetoric and provocative militancy of its myopic and ill- educated clerics and shallow youth, the country’s second majority (not minority!) stands at cross roads. Even the ones from the clergy are indulging in petty mindedness characterized by an extremely narrow and irresponsible outlook completely out of tune with the existing reality. Such leaders are not seriously interested in dealing with the genuine problems of the community. It can be seen that Muslim leaders, clerics and even petty politicians are becoming richer and richer day by day while the people they represent, are languishing in their ghettos and their institutions like the Urdu medium schools, madrasas, khanqahs, maktabs etc, are all nothing more than obscure dungeons. For the last 71 years they have been exploited by the politicians of various hues views.
Afflicted by utter educational backwardness, the administrative apathy and political expediency, the Muslim community in India has been cajoled by almost all the politicians but mostly by the ones from their own fold. These opportunist leaders have been crying hoarse merely indulging in lip-service both inside the parliament as well as outside it.
In this ghettoized situation emerged the churlish political middlemen as interlocutors for communities picking on sensational issues that would apparently tighten their stranglehold on the people they pretend to represent by diverting the attention from real bread and butter issues. Love Jehad, Ghar Wapsi, Shah Bano, Triple Talaq, Babri Masjid, etc are not the real issues.

Taking a leaf from Azad

Calling from Quran for freedom, Maulana Azad coalesced with endogenic creativity, the Vedantic vision of many parts of truth with the Islamic doctrine of Wahdat-e-Deen (unity of religion) and Sulah-e-Kul (universal peace).
Although Azad started his career as an aalim (religious leader), his faith in nationalism, as MKC Gandhi described it, was as robust as his faith in Islam. Though born in a family steeped in religious traditions, Azad was singularly free from all traces of pride and prejudice on religious grounds. As his outlook was scientific and progressive, Maulana Sahab would never agree to what was taught by the traditional mullas and maulvis or the orthodox Muslim theologians as his outlook was scientific and he was a “Modern Maulana”!
Azad did not agree with Jinnah at all and his Lahore address was a lance in Azad’s heart after Jinnah transformed himself as the Qaied-e-Azam of the Muslim nation, his long-cherished ambition. Azad was aware that there was no turning back in Jinnah’s dictionary.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad is, by any reckoning, a major figure in twentieth-century Indian History. He was a scholar thoroughly trained in the traditional Islamic sciences, with great intellectual abilities and eloquence of pen and speech. He had, in addition, a remarkable openness to modern western knowledge even as he opposed western rule over India.
It goes without saying that in the galaxy of patriots and heroes of Indian freedom struggle, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad occupies a unique place head high above shoulders of the others as far as the pitched resistance against the vivisection of the country is concerned. He was the tallest amongst the nationalist Muslims, a savant servant.
Azad was a man who was opposed to the very idea of a separate homeland for the Muslims of India because he thought it was in the interest of Muslims themselves to remain part of a greater whole. A blunt man, his writings are clear about his respect for Gandhi, his friendship with Nehru, his distaste for Jinnah’s politics, and his contempt for the mindset of Vallabbhai Patel and his ilk.
It goes without saying that in the galaxy of patriots and heroes of Indian freedom struggle, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad occupies a unique place head high above shoulders of the others as far as the pitched resistance against the vivisection of the country is concerned. He was the tallest amongst the nationalist Muslims, a savant servant, as also stated in 2005 in Delhi High Court by Justice Vijendra Jain in an order issued in the PIL by this author to protect Maulana Azad mausoleum.
---
*Chancellor, Maulana Azad National Urdu University; grandnephew, Maulana Azad

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Now, top Gujarat "litterateur" close to Modi says: Godse was patriot, so was Gandhi

By Rajiv Shah
A little over a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized BJP candidate from Bhopal Pragya Thakur for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot saying he would never forgive her for the remark, a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, known to close to Modi in Gujarat, has supported her, saying her statement should be seen “within a context.” Thakur won from Bhopal by more than 3.5 lakh votes defeating her nearest rival, veteran Congressman and ex-Madhya Pradesh chief minister Digvijay Singh.

Opposition refuses to legally challenge EVMs amidst plans of "back to ballot" protest

Counterview Desk
Even as opposition to the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) allegedly to rig polls is growing, a group of prominent citizens who have come together to form the EVM Virodhi Rashtriya Jan Andolan has controversially called for a national protest against EVMs on May 30, demanding future elections should be held only on ballot paper.

When a Pak scribe said Modi has 'proved' Jinnah’s two nation theory right...

By Zafar Agha*
It was around nine in the morning on May 24, 2019, a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi stormed the Lok Sabha with 300-plus MPs. It was a call from a journalist friend, Muzamal Suhrawardy, from Lahore, Pakistan. I ignored the call. We liberals had a depressing day the previous evening as the opposition to Modi and BJP collapsed. The results belied reports from the ground and even assessments made by colleagues.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

It's now official: Akshay Kumar has not been conferred honorary Canadian citizenship

By Our Representative
It is now official. Super-star Akshay Kumar has not been conferred any honorary citizenship by Canadian authorities, as claimed by him ahead of the 2019 elections. In reply to a query by Roshan Shah, who is a Canadian citizen living in Waterloo, Ontario, and belongs to Ahmedabad, the country’s authorities dealing with issues related with immigration, refugees and citizenship in Canada have said that only six persons have so far been granted honorary citizenship.

Govt of India overestimated GDP by 2.5%, must restore reputational damage: Ex-CEA

By Rajiv Shah
Top economist Arvind Subramanian has said that changes brought about by the Government of India in data sources and methodology for estimating the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) since 2011-12 “has led to a significant overestimation of growth”. While official estimates place annual average GDP growth between 2011-12 and 2016-17 at about 7 percent, the actual growth may have been 4½ percent, ranging from 3 ½ to 5 ½ percent during the period, he adds.

Common thread of Modi, political Hinduism, nationalism? 'Contest' of ideas isn't over

By Salman Khurshid*
Losing the 2019 election and that too in a somewhat extreme manner has confronted us with unexpected challenges: Our leadership has naturally taken it very hard and to heart but with suggested options that we cannot imagine or contemplate. Hopefully the emotions will settle soon and give us the direction to pick up the pieces and march again.

If EC's credibility is under question, shouldn't one "assume" EVMs might be tampered?

Counterview Desk
Gauhar Raza, scientist, documentary film maker and poet; senior human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi of the Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (ANHAD); military veteran Major Priyadarshi Chowdhury (retd); and Sucheta De and Sandeep Saurav of the All India Students' Association (AISA), have asked “individuals, organisations and people's movements” to send their endorsement to an appeal they have prepared on Electronic Voting Machine (EVM).

Will minorities in India be 2nd class citizens? Wake up call: Be a 'communicating' Church

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
India today is at a defining moment of her history. There is so much that has taken place in the past five years (and particularly in the last ten days)- that several citizens of the country are genuinely concerned about the future of the country! Will democracy survive? Will key elements of the Constitution be changed?