Skip to main content

Jinnah controversy: Kahin pe nigahe, kahin pe nishana; an effort to spread hate politics with an eye on 2019 polls

By Adv Masood Peshimam

The Muslims in India are a historically defeated community for variety of reasons, one of the main reasons being betrayal of the interests of the community by its own coreligionists. Dr Iqbal described the betrayal of the community by coreligionists in the following words:
“Jafar as Bengal, Sadique as Deccan
Nagne din, nange Millat, nange Watan
[Jafar from Bengal, Sadique from Deccan
The slur on the religion, slur on the community and slur on the nation]”

Mir Jafar and Mir Sadique, who betrayed Sirajouddaula in Plassy and Tipu Sultan at Suranga Pattam had larger dreams to cherish. They wanted to have fair share of the sultanate and other big rewards from the British.
In the current scenario, small time Muslim leaders are ready to be sold on a cup of tea or some small favour. These small time leaders have emerged through multiple platforms like Mushaira [poetic proceeding], Iftar Parties, Idd Milan, charitable programmes like collective marriages, free distribution of note books, Urdu school and college functions, so on and so forth. These programmes are not per se bad and there is no attempt to denigrate or undermine their efficacy, but they provide platform for small-time leaders to assert their social role without any depth of calibre and sincerity.
It is against this murky scenario that some Muslims sought permission to open the RSS shakha in Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). Vice chancellor Tarique Mansoori was put in profound unease to answer the proposal. The proposal was absurd with the lurking question: Would a branch of Jamat-e-Islami, Jamat-e-Ulma-i-Hind or Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul Muslimeen (MIM) be accommodated in the Banaras Hindu University? Would anyone dare to talk in such terms?
RSS shakha or any fundamentalist organisation of any hue or colour has no scope to flourish in AMU or any other university for that matter as the Leftist Unions are dominating the scene in the universities. Narrow sentiments or communal interests have failed to fashion the growth of social environment in these universities. Once such perception and expectation of opening up a shakha was dashed to the ground, no time was lost in generating controversy over Jinnah portrait, which kept hanging since 1938.
Jinnah was life member of the University. There are a lot of portraits of other dignitaries hanging in the University. Jinnah’s portrait since 1938 never ran into any controversy whatsoever. His portrait does not determine the identification with his ideology or showing any favour for the creation of Pakistan, though fact also remains that Jinnah was not the only one responsible for the partition of the country.
Guru Golwalkar propounded two-nation theory much before Jinnah. Instead of frustrating the concept of partition of the country, efforts were underway to create conditions quite conducive for the growth of Pakistan. A Congress top gun explaining his conciliatory approach towards Pakistan said that the absence of the creation of Pakistan would introduce many a Pakistans in the government departments. It was Maulana Azad and other Muslim leaders who tooth and nail opposed the creation of Pakistan. Bulk of Muslim leadership expressed dissatisfaction with the partition of the country.
Jinnah himself was a political paradox. He never reconciled with the initiation of Khilafat Movement by Gandhiji with the support of the Ali brothers. To Jinnah, any talk of reviving the sagging fortunes of Khilafat was an anathema. Jinnah always made onslaught over religion-based politics. He was a veteran Congressman enjoying good equation with the Congress leadership. He fought the sedition case of Lokmanya Tilak and won it. He virtually made British judges dash to the ground while fighting cases of freedom fighters. He was never subservient before British judges. An incident well explains the position of strength from which Jinnah could talk with British judges.
It so happened that one British judge noticed a bug somewhere in the Bar, and with all the contempt and ridicule said that there was bug at the Bar. Jinnah lost no time in reacting, said, “Of course it came from the Bench.” Jinnah was bold enough to boycott British judges who had convicted Indian freedom fighters.
Jinnah forefathers were Lohana Kachchi who did not come from the mainstream Islam. He was a khoja who married a Parsi without converting her. His daughter was Parsi who recently died in US. His daughter had a litigation concerning Jinnah House in Mumbai. She desired Jinnah’s name to be removed from Jinnah House, may be to curry favour with the authorities to retake Jinnah House. It is not understood as to what made Jinnah, who was liberal and catholic in his approach, to come close to the Muslim League and stamp his signature over the creation of Pakistan.
Concerning Jinnah and the creation of Pakistan, it is relevant to quote what an eminent journalist Aakar Patel wrote in “The Times of India” (6th May 2018): “Jinnah accepted the nature of tribal voting in the subcontinent and stuck to his guns. If Hindus wanted a United India they would have to accommodate Muslims politically. We chose not to then and we have not now as the numbers starkly reveal”. Even with the creation of Pakistan, Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be a secular state where Muslims ceased to be Muslims and Hindus ceased to be Hindus and Christians ceased to be Christians.
Jinnah was a square peg in a round whole, as Pakistani society was and is dominated by the Muslim fanatics. Jinnah’s vision of Pakistan could not match the fanatics in Pakistan. Fanaticism in Pakistan always remained a destabilising factor inviting all disasters. Fanatics, whether Hindus or Muslims, are not ready to tolerate differences, spelling lawlessness in society. It is sad to note that these fanatics a strong growing component in our society.
Notwithstanding reasons for the creation of Pakistan, we are socially a demolished lot, who are to bear all the brunt of that catastrophic event, despite the fact that Indian Muslims have disowned Pakistan.
Jinnah was admired by Lal Krishna Advani and Jaswant Singh for his secular and broader outlook, yet there was no murmur of protest then. Even MC Chagla, education minister under Indira Gandhi’s government, appreciated Jinnah for his legal acumen and sharpness. It was the same Chagla who never wrote his name as Mohammad Karim and willed to be cremated. No harsh words were used for Chagla’s comments over Jinnah.
It is not understood as to what made the right-wing Yuva Vahini stir the hornet’s nest in the name of Jinnah’s portrait in AMU. The discontent was spread when former Vice President Hamid Ansari was to address a gathering at AMU, and he was to be bestowed with life membership. Instead of sorting out the matter with vice chancellor Tarique Mansoori, the Yuva Vahini barged into the premises of the University armed with all sorts of weapons under the protection of police.
The Yuva Vahini owes its origin to rabidly communal chief minister Yogi Adityanath of UP. The forceful entry of the right wing forces led to the eruption of violence between right-wingers and students of AMU, in which the police allegedly sided with the Yuva Vahini. The alleged partisan role of the police is not unusual as there are gruesome stories of police atrocities in the spate of communal incidents.
The allegedly partisan role of the police accompanied with all the brutalities in Meerat, Malyana, Mumbai and Gujarat are too well known to recount. The weak and vulnerable Muslim minority is always at the receiving end. The prejudiced narrative of the police acting against the interests of Muslims does not mean that the entire police force is communal.
Hamid Ansari has become an eyesore for those in corridors of power over his remarks that Muslims are not safe in India. These were his remarks when he was stepping out of his office. He said this against the backdrop of gruesome incidents of mob lynching resulting in to the death of quite a few Muslims. Ansari called spade a spade which drew the sharpest level of vituperation from the communal forces.
Echoing some concern over the worsening plight of Muslims tantamounts to all sorts of liabilities. Poor AR Antulay was a case in point when he was disowned by his own party, Congress, when he questioned the mysterious circumstances in which Hemant Karkare was killed. Bigwigs of Congress stayed away from his funeral. Otherwise, he was Man Friday of the Congress. Late Yunus Salim was shunted out of the Indira Gandhi government when he tried to visit riot torn Aligarh. Such incidents galore.
It’s good to note that Hamid Ansari has the leftist leanings. Otherwise all sorts of cock and bull stories would have spun around him. Members of the Yuva Vahini cared a hoot for the presence of the former vice-president. The very eruption of violence in AMU in the presence of Hamid Ansari explains how powerless Muslim dignitaries are in the country. The allegedly partisan role of the police and the right winger Hindutva forces, out to bully AMU students into submission in the presence of the former vice-president, is not only a slur on Ansari but also amounting to slur over the very prestige of the office of the vice-president.
 Meanwhile, subsequent to the unsavoury incident in AMU, it is learnt, stringent sections like 307 of IPC were slapped against the students of the university. Those opposing the portrait of Jinnah remained silent when Prime Minister Narendra Modi dropped in to attend Nawaz Sharif’s family wedding in Pakistan on way from Afghanistan. The silence of the Yuva Vahini and the likes is enigmatic.
The whole narrative of communal forces is to synchronise the concept of nationalism with Hindutva. Blending nationalism with Hindutva is to polarise the society with an eye on 2019 elections.

Comments

Firoz Bakht Ahmed said…
It is heart rending and very unfortunate to see in the TV debates, some apologists for defending Jinnah, the man, who took 40 per cent of India away from us on religious plank. The unnecessary imbroglio at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) where some people are hell bent in not taking off the Jinnah frame, has not only let the image of the majestic institution down but has once again brought the entire Indian Muslim populace under scanner vis a vis their loyalty to the nation. When such things happen, they crib that their loyalty is questioned and that they are asked time and again to provide their certificate of loyalty. But, it is true that their so called leaders, are misleading them and more dangerous than the portrait is the Jinnah mindset towards which the young Indian Muslim mind is pulled to.
Seven decades after the vivisection, the Jinnah ideology is though dead and defunct, however, its ashes with some ambers can still be seen in some conflagrant and divisive leaders mindset like — Asaduddin Owaisi, Azam Khan and the spokes persons of the bodies like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB). Besides the Jinnah mindset can be traced in the actions of Kashmiri separatists and those refusing to accept yoga or “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, as part of their national heritage.
All this trouble started when Aligarh BJP MP Satish Gautam objected to Jinnah’s portrait and sought an explanation from AMU Vice-Chancellor Tariq Mansoor for hanging his picture on the wall of the student union’s hall. This was followed by Hindu Yuva Vahini’s 48-hour ultimatum to the AMU to remove Jinnah’s image. Hindu Yuva Vahini is an outfit founded by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. They tried to gate crash into the university for fulfilling their demand. The group, marching towards the Bab-e-Syed gate, started shouting slogans and entered the campus. It was then that the clashes broke out, forcing the police to resort to baton charge injuring the AMU students. Hindu Yuva Vahini’s demand for the Jinnah portrait removal was right but the method was riotous and wrong. The AMU students stated that the Hindu Yuva Vahini brigade came with a design to indulge in violence and arson.

TRENDING

#MeToo moment in Hyderabad Urdu varsity? Two girl students seek action against authorities

Counterview Desk
Has the #MeToo movement reached Maulana Azad National Urdu University (MAANU)? It would seem so if a recent letter by newly-appointed chancellor Firoz Bakht Ahmed to MAANU vice-chancellor Dr Aslam Parvaiz is any indication. Seeking reinstatement of two girl victims of “sexual harassment and humiliation”, the letter specifically names head of the department of the Media Centre for Journalism, suspecting, the problem could be much deeper.
Text of the letter: It is a matter of utmost perturbation for me to receive the two representations from the girls studying in the MCJ (Media Center for Journalism) regarding their sexual and subsequently, mental and social harassment at the hands of Prof Ehtesham Ahmad Khan, the HOD, MCJ.
We do not know, how many girls have been exploited by him and preferred to be silent for saving their family’s honour; however, there are two brave girls who stood to the depraved advances and misuse by Prof Ehtesham and came up with written complai…

"Ineligible" funding of Sardar Statue in Gujarat: CAG tells Central PSUs, it's not a heritage CSR activity

By Our Representative
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, in its recent report on Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE), has qualified public sector undertakings’ (PSUs') funding the 182-metre world’s highest Sardar Statue, currently being constructed in the Narmada river downstream of the Sardar Sarovar dam as an “ineligible” corporate social responsibility (CSR) activity.

Gujarat BJP MLAs, youth leader "incited" attack on North Indians: Cong releases video

Counterview Desk
Senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil, currently in charge of Bihar and national spokesperson, All-India Congress Committee, has sent a legal notice to chief minister Vijay Rupani threatening criminal case and civil defamation suit for accusing him with "baseless statement" that he was responsible for attacks on north Indians in Gujarat.

29th "NRC-related" suicide in Assam, as Nirod Baran Das takes his life by hanging on a fan

By Our Representative
Reporting 29th case of National Register of Citizens (NRC)-driven suicide in Assam, one of India’s human rights campaign sites has said that, on October 20, tragedy struck Kharupetia town in Darrang district of Assam, when a retired school teacher and advocate Nirod Baran Das “took his life by hanging himself to a fan in his home.” The report adds, “The NRC process has so far claimed over two dozen such lives in the past four months alone.”

"Highly irregular" for PSUs to fund Sardar Statue under Corporate Social Responsibility

Counterview Desk
In a letter to I Srinivas, secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, former secretary (economic affairs), Ministry of Finance, EAS Sarma, has raised questions on the funding of the Sardar Patel statue in South Gujarat by Central Public Sector Undertaking (CPSUs) relying on the Comptroller and Auditor General report (No 18/2018).

Murder of Tamil Nadu teenage Dalit girl: "Stoic silence" despite #MeToo movement

Counterview Desk
Brinelle D'souza, who is with the Centre for Health and Mental Health, School of Social Work, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, has prepared a strong statement to protest the brutal murder of 13-year-old Rajalakshmi. "Other than a few media reports, this gruesome killing has not caught national attention despite a very vibrant #MeToo campaign currently underway", regrets D'souza.

Post-MJ Akbar resignation: #MeToo movement and fears of backlash

By Sheshu Babu*
For the last few days, #MeToo movement has picked up momentum and many women are coming out with horrific tales of severe harassment in their past lives. They are not afraid anymore to expose famous persons including those at ministerial levels. As a senior journalist Neeraja Chowdhury opined (“An exit, a beginning”, October 18, 2018, indianexpress.com), "The #MeToo revelations are like the eruption of a volcano which was imminent, given the journey working women have covered. It was not easy to make public what they had gone through,and take on powerful men.”

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Bank account frozen, raid on Amnesty office: Govt of India "treating" human rights NGOs like criminal enterprises

By Abhirr VP*
Amnesty India’s bank accounts have been frozen by the Enforcement Directorate, effectively stopping its work. Amnesty India is thus the latest target of the government’s assault on civil society in the country. The accounts of Greenpeace India were frozen earlier this month.

60 ex-civil servants seek release of CAG reports on Rafale, demonetisation before 2019 polls

Counterview Desk
As many as 60 retired civil servants have asked President Ram Nath Kovind to expedite the release of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) reports on demonetisation and the Rafale deal. The letter, signed mainly by former Indian Administrative Service, Indian Foreign Service and Indian Police Service officers, regrets that the status of the audit is "unclear”. According to them, “An impression is gaining ground that CAG is deliberately delaying its audit reports on demonetisation and Rafale deal till after the May 2019 elections so as not to embarrass the present government”.