Skip to main content

Ambedkar a Brahmin? By that criterion, Sangh Pariwar may have to be called untouchables for their stupidity

By Anand Teltumbde*
Rajendra Trivedi, speaker of the Gujarat Assembly, while speaking at the ‘Mega Brahmin Business Summit’ in Gandhinagar on 29 April added himself to the hall of infamy with his comments that Ambedkar was a Brahmin.
He thought that he was making a profound comment, but it is as brain-dead, as any of the loud-mouthed comments of the galaxy of partymen such as union minister Anant Kumar Hegde, Haryana minister Anil Vij, union minister Kiren Rijiju, union minister Giriraj Singh, union minister Giriraj Singh, former Uttarakhand chief minister Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank, lawmaker Sakshi Maharaj, union minister Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, chief minister of Tripura Biplab Deb, governor of Tripura Tathagat Roy, union minister of state for HRD Satyapal Singh, just to randomly name a few from a seemingly unending list, not to forget Narendra Modi himself.
Every other person from the Sangh Parivar either utters a lie or stupidity. By the criterion Trivedi devised to determine the Brahminhood of a person, the entire tribe belonging to Sangh Pariwar may have to be called the untouchables for their stupidity.
None doubts Ambedkar’s scholarship and hence Trivedi need not belabor to give him a certificate. That work was done by institutions like Columbia University and London University 100 years ago. It is only Brahminic arrogance that persons like him should speak in evaluative terms about Dr Ambedkar.
 Even speaking about the RSS, Trivedi’s ideological parent, Ambedkar was a Brahmin way back in 1980s when he was included in the list of its pratahsmaraniya. And there was a strategic blitzkrieg launched to show him in saffron colour. They said that he and Hedgewars were great friends; that Ambedkar was great praise for the RSS shakhas, that he was the greatest Hindu and so on, dexterously mixing complete lies with half truths. 
They may have succeeded in wooing gullible Dalit masses and self-seeking Dalit leaders, but the fact remains that even they know the problematic of appropriating Ambedkar. If any Indian represented complete antithesis of the Sangh Pariwar’s hindutva, it would only be Dr Ambedkar. And Trivedi has temerity to undermine Ambedkar by clubbing him with Modi as knowledgeable people to qualify as Brahmins.
Ambedkar surely was one of the most educated persons of his times, whereas there have been controversies about Modi’s shady degrees as claimed by him. Can there be comparison between the two? Ambedkar was a great rationalist and valorized scientific temper as he saw them as the fundamental scaffolding of democracy. The basic fact of being a pracharak of the RSS that is founded on irrationality of ancient glory of imagined India might disqualify him to stand by Ambedkar. 
Modi distinguished himself as the first prime minister to endorse the Hindu nationalists’ longstanding irrational claims that many discoveries of modern science and technology were known to the people of ancient India (sic). 
In October 2014, while speaking before a gathering of doctors and other professionals at a hospital in Mumbai, he had said, “We all read about Karna in the Mahabharata. If we think a little more, we realise that the Mahabharata says Karna was not born from his mother’s womb. This means that genetic science was present at that time. That is why Karna could be born outside his mother’s womb.” 
Perhaps this vestige of knowledge impressed Trivedi to see Modi as Brahmin in the company of Dr Ambedkar. But that is precisely the stupidity of the people of Trivedi’s ilk. They do not know that Ambedkar was a great democrat, whereas Modi is a aspiring fascist. Trivedi must know that there is not an iota of comparability between Ambedkar and Modi.
Perhaps it is too much to expect from Trivedi to understand that Ambedkar did not aspire to be a Brahmin; he wanted to annihilate castes that created these poisonous identities. He relentlessly attacked Brahminism, the ideology of hegemonic Brahmins, not the people of that caste. 
This attack culminated into his conversion to the Buddhism that historically stood a strong challenge to Brahminism. Even to this day, Buddhism represents the religious and ideological alternative to the latter. As he spattered his wisdom before the bunch of Brahmins in Gandhinagar, the 300 Dalits of Una, were renouncing Hinduism and embracing Buddhism at Mota Samdhiala that reminded of the flogging of a Dalit family for flaying dead cattle by the self-appointed Gau Rakshaks.
They have spoken out their annoyance with the BJP that none of the promises made by its functionaries were fulfilled. Such frustration of Dalits is pervasive during the BJP’s misrule.
Trivedi’s speaking before the caste based organization and invoking superiority of Brahmins, howsoever, polished, is abominable. Trivedi-like people help uncover the casteist core of the Sangh Pariwar. 
The essence of caste is hierarchy and speaking of it in any form is casteism. All upper caste people claim that they never believe in caste but at the same time would never forget to mention that they belonged to the upper caste. This is worse kind of casteism than that manifested by a caste atrocity. What does Trivedi mean by making Ambedkar Brahmin? Actually, it means that Dalits are lower than Brahmins. Interestingly, Trivedi did not stop at only Modi or Ambedkar. He went even to distribute caste certificates to his gods: Ram as a Kshtriya and Krishna as an OBC (Other Backward Caste).
Despite Ambedkar’s accomplishments, he remains in need of such epithets. Howsoever, the BJP pour in crores of rupees of public money to grandly memorialize Ambedkar in one-upmanship over the Congress and mesmerize gullible Dalits, the underscoring point is to stress BJP’s Brahminic superiority that it could grant greatness to Ambedkar. 
It is the age-old stratagem of Brahminism to deify someone to suppress her tribe. It made woman a goddess and worshipped her in order to subjugate women to a subhuman level. Today it deifies Ambedkar to crush Dalits to pulp. Whether it is drastic reduction in the component plan provisions in successive budgets, reduction in scholarships, denial of reservations, killing of Rohith Vemula, flogging of Dalits, blatantly unlawful incarceration of Chandrashekhar Azad of Bhim Army, killing of Dalits with impunity or the galloping rise in incidence of atrocities, the suppression of Dalits is inversely proportional to the deification of Ambedkar.
If Trivedi honestly wants to invoke caste idiom, he should not be patronizing in assigning Brahminhood to others to extol superiority of his caste; he should rather accept dalithood for himself and renounce the lofty position he occupies today.
---
*General secretary, Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (CPDR) , and author of  "Republic of Caste". Source: countercurrents.org

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."

Holy dip in Sabarmati? Ahmedabad industrial units discharge wastewater despite notice

By Our Representative
In a sharp admission, the Gujarat government has said that most of the industrial units of Ahmedabad, as also the city's residential houses, discharge waste water in Sabarmati, polluting the river. Notably, the river’s 11 kilometre stretch in Ahmedabad, where the riverfront has been beautified, is sought to be projected as a model for the country as a whole.