Skip to main content

Indian banks "hit poor, help corporates" by imposing penalty for non-maintenance of minimum balance in accounts

By Our Representative
In a sharply-worded statement, dozens of civil rights organizations and activists have taken strong exception to India's banks charging penalty for not maintaining a monthly average balance, saying it "directly affects the poor". Pointing out that the banks are doing it "because of their financial compulsions", it gives the example of how State Bank of India (SBI) is doing it despite its huge profits.
"SBI levied Rs 1,771 crores between April and November 2017 as charges from customers who did not maintain their minimum monthly average balance (MAB) in their accounts. SBI’s quarterly profit for the July-September quarter was Rs 1,586 crores. The fine was nearly half of the net profit between the period of April and September 2017, which was Rs 3,586 crores", the statement says, quoting a media report.
The statement says, "On one hand, the government is compelling citizens to open bank accounts and discouraging cash transactions and, on the other, its policies – often haphazard and detrimental to common people’s lives – are forcing banks to levy such charges to cope up with the costs of such policies. Linking of aadhaar-PAN with bank accounts is one such, after the disastrous demonetization."
Calling SBI managing-director Rajnish Kumar's defence in this context "disturbing", the statement quotes him as saying that SBI was planning to raise Rs 2,000 crores as a penalty for non-compliance of minimum balance which it intended to use partly for aadhaar-PAN linking, along with covering for other losses in banking operations.

According to the statement says, "The inordinate push for linking aadhaar to bank accounts, even while the Supreme Court is hearing the matter, shows the level of disregard this government has for law and our country’s legal institutions like Supreme Court."
It adds, "The financial burden of its arbitrary policies is passed on to the poor, working and middle-class customers, who are already burdened with the continuing impacts of decisions like demonetization", which "exemplifies how anti-people this government is."
Pointing out that the SBI had withdrawn it's clause for the penalty for not having minimum balance in May 2012 with the aim of widening its customer base, the statement underlines, "At that time many people shifted their accounts to SBI from the private banks as the private banks were levying a heavy charge for the minimum balance requirement."
However, it notes, "In April 2017, SBI reintroduced this penalty after Reserve Bank of India (RBI) permitted banks to levy charges if customers failed to comply with the minimum balance limit." Ever since then, it adds, the move has been criticized by a "wide spectrum of organizations" as it has been "largely considered an anti-people."
Insisting that the operational losses for banks as identified by Kumar are "marginal when we consider the losses incurred by the banks due to Non-Performing Assets (NPA)", the statement says, "Indian banks have been unable to keep a check on their rising NPAs. According to RBI, NPAs of Indian banks stood at Rs 7,11,312 crore at the end of March 2017, which jumped to Rs 8,29,338 crores by June 2017 and then further to Rs 8,36,782 crores by end of September 2017."
'"Instead of going tough on the defaulting corporate borrowers, public sector banks had wroteoff over Rs 55,000 crore of loans between April and September 2017", the statement says, adding, "It is highly unethical on the part of their part to extract a penalty from the financially weaker account holders for their inability to maintain a minimum balance, instead of recovering the loans given to the corporate customers."
Issued among others by All India Union of Forest Working People, Beyond Copenhagen Collective, Centre for Financial Accountability, Narmada Bachao Andolan, Amulya Nidhi of Nai Shuruwat, Ashok Srimali of Mines, Minerals & People, Bharat Patel of the Machimar Adhikaar Sangharsh Sangathan (Kutch), Bilal Khan of the Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Abhiyaan, and Himanshu Thakkar of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People, the statement demands the clause for the penalty due to non-maintenance of minimum be withdrawn.

Comments

samir sardana said…
The Working class of India,are going to lose all their bank funds soon !

The GOI is pushing Indian Banks, to lend for NMP. The private sector has to pay, Rs 7,00,000 crores, to the GOI for the NMP.

These are 1st time or limited expertise entrepreneurs, who will tie up with International JV partners,for the infra projects.

When Indian banks lend to conventional greenfield or brownfield projects,they take an Equitable or English Mortgage,PLUS a hypothecation of specific assets, escrow accounts and Guarantees of Promoters ........., and STILL THE LOANS ARE NOT REPAID,and the bank is left with worthless assets.

The GOI now wants these very banks,to lend to NMP projects,where there is no mortgageable asset.There is only the technical know of the JV partners,and the promoters financial contribution ! The past empirical pattern of cash inflows,from the infra asset - might not exist or might not be material,& WILL CERTAINLY NOT JUSTIFY the NMP loan,to the promoters!

Escrow is NOT a loan security - it is a secured payment gateway !

Still the banks will lend the funds,as the banks are indirectly funding the GOI ,IA the NMP promoter ! So it is a secured loan - to the extent that,if the promoter goes bust - then a new promoter steps in,and loses all the investment in the NMP Project !

In essence,NMP bank loans is a free ride for the promoters,who need to invest just the seed capital to get in a Foreign JV partner,and JV funds,and then take the balance,from the banks. The promoter has to TRY HIS BEST,to drive efficiencies and ALT revenue streams - and if he succeeds - HE HAS A JACKPOT.If not,a NEW PROMOTER comes in.

A bank which cannot appraise a steel NPA - will OBVIOUSLY not be able to appraise the FORECASTED EFFICIENCIES OF THE NMP projects.SO IN COMES THE "CONSULTANT" - whose report will be relied upon by the BANKS - as such.All the NMP consultants used by the GOI and the Banks, HAVE BEEN ON THE PAYROLL,OF THE INTERNATIONAL AND INDIAN INFRA COMPANIES !

As a thought - the GOI could have hived off the NMP assets,into a SPV and raised International funds and Bank loans ! Y do a lease ? The terms of funds would be better for the GOI,in a SPV ! The JV partners in the SPV,would drive EFFICIENCIES - and there would be no need for the GOI,to share the EFFICIENCY PROFITS with the lessee !

SO Y DID THE GOI DO THE LEASE MODEL ?

U GOTTA BE KIDDING ME ! dindooohindoo

THE GOI WANTS THE PANWARI BANIAS TO MAKE BILLIONS,AND THEN SHARE IT WITH THE BJP !

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Narmada Valley's fossil evidence: Ground for 'nationalists' to argue primates' India roots?

By Saurav Sarkar*  In December 1982, a geologist digging in India’s Central Narmada Valley found something he did not expect. Arun Sonakia, who at the time worked for the Geological Survey of India, unearthed a hominid fossil skullcap from the Pleistocene era. The discovery sent shockwaves through the field of paleoanthropology and put South Asia on the map of human prehistory. Some experts concluded that the skull likely belonged to a member of a predecessor species of ours, Homo heidelbergensis , or perhaps was a hybrid of homo species, while Sonakia himself suggested “ an affinity… to Homo erectus .”

Living standards in 'model' Gujarat worse than major states: Govt of India document

By Rajiv Shah  Amidst raging controversy over whether the latest Government of India’s “Household Consumption Expenditure Survey 2022-23 Fact Sheet: August 2022-July 2023” suggests that India’s poverty levels are actually down to 4.5 to 5%  during the decade-long Narendra Modi rule, a state-wise breakup in the 27-page document shows that “model” Gujarat’s average consumption expenditure is far below most of the so-called developed states.

Not livable in summer, Chitrakut PM-Awas houses 'push' tribals in moneylender trap

By Bharat Dogra*  Those who are in-charge of implementing the PM-Awas scheme of rural housing can rightly take pride in what has been achieved in Dafai hamlet (Karvi block, Chitrakut district, Uttar Pradesh). All the Kol tribal families here are extremely poor and vulnerable. In a rare achievement, almost all of them have received housing assistance under PM Awas. 

WTO 'loses legitimacy': CSOs shut out of normal participation in MC13 at Abu Dhabi

By Deborah James  Given unprecedented repression of participants, the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) at Abu Dhabi should not continue until historical and international standards and human rights for participation in global governance are restored.