Skip to main content

Sadhguru's Rally of Rivers is "meant to help" corporate interests; why is it silent on sea intrusion in Narmada?: NBA

By Our Representative
In a sharply-worded statement, well-known anti-dam organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), has accused the Rally of Rivers campaign, led by Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev Maharaj, going on across India allegedly with the support of the establishment, of playing in the hands of India's corporate interests.
"Jaggi Maharaj has gathered millions of rupees from many corporate and many media houses, and also mobilized many environmental lovers, common citizens and young people together", NBA notes, adding, "Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan and Prime Minister Narendra Modi also appear to be associated with it."
"Corporates like Adani and Ambani are behind Jaggi Vasudev", it says, adding, the corporates are backing it because his campaign supports government plans like Namami Devi Narmade, or river-interlinking, waterways etc., where there is a "huge investment opportunity for them", and the "Rally for Rivers campaign creates opportunity for them."
Asks NBA, "Why is Sadhguru silent on forest conservation, and talks of industrial farming, talks about crop insurance despite its failure, or about water decentralisation but not about dams? Why such silence on matters of importance, is it because he is hand in gloves with the powers that be?"
Believes NBA, "In Jaggi Vasudev’s concept of saving the rivers, there is no special thing except tree plantation. They talk about river catchment area, water bodies, sub-rivers, ecosystems, maps and descriptions, but not of the causes that bring destruction to rivers."
Pointing towards massive sand mining continuing along Narmada river, NBA wonders, "On one side tree plantation, and on the other hand illegal sand mining, is it acceptable to Sadhguru Maharaj? Encroachment in the catchment area of rivers particularly by big capitalists, (not just by the poor who have are always targeted), what is his stand on that?"
NBA goes on, "In his conception and recommendations, Sadhguru and his Isha Foundation say that it 'will not say anything about hydroelectric schemes, river water transport etc., will not take emotional or political role, and will speak only on classical/scientific basis'. Will it be a scientific practice to ignore the impact of these projects?"
NBA queries, "Today, sea ingress till 30 km is happening in Narmada, in Gujarat, making it saline, why does Sadhguru remain silent on it? Sadhguru says the overuse of water is a big reason behind it. At the expense of drinking water and irrigation the water from Sardar Sarovar and Indira Sagar reservoirs are being given to Coca Cola and other industries, is this the right use?"
"Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev and his followers who talk about the heritage of the river valley, do not mention the destruction and submergence of the centuries old river valley like Narmada with its ancient temples, mosques, archaeological treasures, and even a few million trees standing today. Isn’t that a big contradiction?", asks NBA.
Giving reason why he is not talking about all this, NBA says, "Sadhguru who has taken up to saving the rivers by spending millions of crores of rupees himself is accused of violation of many environmental laws in Tamil Nadu. Encroachment on the Kundakoi tributary of the river Noyal, construction of ashram with nearly one thousand buildings on the reserved forest, encroachment on the elephants corridors, are some of the acts he is involved in."
It adds, "There are many petitions filed before the court against him, which are in progress. In this regard, the government officials of Combatore district have confirmed these violations in affidavits and even given stop order."

Comments

Aman Sharma said…
Surprised to read this. Three points

1. Clearly, the NBA team has not read the 700 page document submitted to the gvt for river revitalisation. For their benefit, here is the link http://rallyforrivers.org/draft-policy
2. Sand mining issue has been covered in this document. Check page 17, point (g). Screenshot here https://www.dropbox.com/s/bam9ksl5vncgrf6/RFR%20Screenshot.jpg?dl=0
3. Asking why Sadhguru does not talk about the Narmada dam is like expecting him to expand the scope of the rally itself. The NBA should avoid imposing its agenda on others.

Aman Sharma
Twitter - @amancool5
Raj said…
Accusations are being floated left, right and center but not backed by facts actually. That Sadhguru has gathered millions of rupees in itself is an accusation not backed by any facts produced. Secondly the NBA team had clearly not gone through the Rally for rivers policy document .. the issues of farming failure, sand mining, etc. have been addressed in it. That NBA expects Sadhguru to support them is like forcefully imposing their idealogies on others.
Kumar said…
Respected Sirs, Its very clearly seen in your article that its articulated from the mind from which no fruitful solution comes out for the country and it always pull back if anything good happening in the country. Still you have time to change your mindset and be proud to be an Indian.

TRENDING

US research: 40% of India's casteist Facebook posts are anti-reservation, anti-Dalit

By Rajiv Shah
A recent American civil society research has found that 40% of India's casteist posts on Facebook (FB) have anti-reservation slant. Asserting that the reservation policy in India is similar to affirmative action in the United States, the research study, titled "Facebook India: Towards The Tipping Point of Violence Caste and Religious Hate Speech", says, this type of hate content on FB is mainly directed against Dalits and Adivasis.

Sanjiv Bhatt paying price for deposing on Modi role in Gujarat riots: Wife Shweta

Counterview Desk
Following the Jamnagar sessions court ordering life imprisonment to former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt for his alleged involvement in three decades old custodial death case, his wife Shweta Bhatt has said that he has been sentenced for a “for a crime he did not commit”, even as criticizing the Indian Police Service (IPS) Association, Gujarat, for not standing up for him.

How Gujarat govt imposed curbs on livestock export for 'fear' of losing BJP vote share

By RK Misra*
Insidious are the ways authorities function, preaching one thing, practicing quite another. Administrative muscle-flexing to suit political goals was on display when the BJP-led Vijay Rupani government in Gujarat banned the export of livestock days ahead of Eid. Even the Narendra Modi-led government expressed its intent to confirm it countrywide, but stopped short of doing so.

One of the least peaceful countries, India's global peace ranking deteriorates: Report

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released report has asserted that India's ranking in the Global Peace Index (GPI) is 141st among 163 countries, deteriorating by four ranks in a year. Ranking 163 countries by providing a score to each, the report, prepared by the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), headquartered in Sydney, Australia, has found India to be one of the least peaceful nations in the region.

Sabarmati 'cleaned up' swimming pool style: Untreated effluents discharged in river

Counterview Desk
In a fresh letter to the secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, senior Gujarat environmentalists Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS) have taken strong objection to the recent clean-up drive of the about 11.3 km stretch of Sabarmati riverbed undertaken by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), terming it as “swimming pool type clean-up.” The river’s total length is 371 km.

Jharkhand mob lynching: Adivasis protest police 'inaction', FIR against victims

Counterview Desk
The Jharkhand Janadhikar Manch (JJM), a civil rights network, on Monday sponsored a protest against the police action against the Adivasi victims of the lynching which took on April 10, 2019, in Jurmu village of Dumri block in Gumla district of Jharkhand. The incident led the death of Prakash Lakda, aged 50.

Senior advocates targeted because they took up cases against Amit Shah: Lawyers' NGO

Counterview Desk
The Lawyers Collective (LC), an NGO claiming to promote human rights issues, has expressed surprise at the latest move by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register an FIR against the Lawyers Collective (LC), its president Anand Grover and unknown office bearers for alleged violation of the Foreign Contributions Regulation Act (FCRA).

Shah Bano case: Arif Mohd Khan gives clean chit to Rajiv Gandhi, says Modi can't take credit for talaq order

By Our Representative
In an usual defence of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, Arif Mohammad Khan, the UP politician who quit the Rajiv Cabinet in 1986 over its stance on the Shah Bano case, has said that he does not "believe that Rajiv Gandhi took the decision to overturn the Supreme Court verdict" on the case "on his own."

Mental health: India's 95% patients "deprived" of medical care, treatment gap 70%

By Moin Qazi*
Among the many challenges India faces, the most underappreciated is the ongoing mental health crisis. Mental illness is actually India’s ticking bomb. An estimated 56 million Indians suffer from depression, and 38 million from anxiety disorders. For those who suffer from mental illness, life can seem like a terrible prison from which there is no hope of escape; they are left forlorn and abandoned, stigmatized, shunned and misunderstood.

FIR against Lawyers’ Collective a ‘witch-hunt’ of outspoken human rights defenders

Counterview Desk
In a statement, Ravi Kiran Jain* and Dr V Suresh** of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have said the CBI’s FIR against the Lawyers’ Collective and senior advocate Anand Grover is an undisguised attempt to silence not just the top human rights organization but is also meant to “serve as a lesson to all others who dare to challenge the Central Government.”
Calling the FIR “motivated, vengeful and vituperative act”, PUCL said the Lawyers’ Collective, which has for 38 years of its existence has taken up cases related with domestic violence, human rights, labour and womens’ rights, adding, among the important ones are the “Naz case on rights of the LGBTQ community, the Novartis case, the Sabarimala case, the triple talaaq case and the Sohrabuddin case, in which current Home Minister and BJP leader Amit Shah was involved.”
Demanding immediate withdrawal of the FIR, PUCL said, “The case lodged against the organization smacks of vendetta for its exceptional …