Skip to main content

Sadhguru's Rally of Rivers is "meant to help" corporate interests; why is it silent on sea intrusion in Narmada?: NBA

By Our Representative
In a sharply-worded statement, well-known anti-dam organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), has accused the Rally of Rivers campaign, led by Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev Maharaj, going on across India allegedly with the support of the establishment, of playing in the hands of India's corporate interests.
"Jaggi Maharaj has gathered millions of rupees from many corporate and many media houses, and also mobilized many environmental lovers, common citizens and young people together", NBA notes, adding, "Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan and Prime Minister Narendra Modi also appear to be associated with it."
"Corporates like Adani and Ambani are behind Jaggi Vasudev", it says, adding, the corporates are backing it because his campaign supports government plans like Namami Devi Narmade, or river-interlinking, waterways etc., where there is a "huge investment opportunity for them", and the "Rally for Rivers campaign creates opportunity for them."
Asks NBA, "Why is Sadhguru silent on forest conservation, and talks of industrial farming, talks about crop insurance despite its failure, or about water decentralisation but not about dams? Why such silence on matters of importance, is it because he is hand in gloves with the powers that be?"
Believes NBA, "In Jaggi Vasudev’s concept of saving the rivers, there is no special thing except tree plantation. They talk about river catchment area, water bodies, sub-rivers, ecosystems, maps and descriptions, but not of the causes that bring destruction to rivers."
Pointing towards massive sand mining continuing along Narmada river, NBA wonders, "On one side tree plantation, and on the other hand illegal sand mining, is it acceptable to Sadhguru Maharaj? Encroachment in the catchment area of rivers particularly by big capitalists, (not just by the poor who have are always targeted), what is his stand on that?"
NBA goes on, "In his conception and recommendations, Sadhguru and his Isha Foundation say that it 'will not say anything about hydroelectric schemes, river water transport etc., will not take emotional or political role, and will speak only on classical/scientific basis'. Will it be a scientific practice to ignore the impact of these projects?"
NBA queries, "Today, sea ingress till 30 km is happening in Narmada, in Gujarat, making it saline, why does Sadhguru remain silent on it? Sadhguru says the overuse of water is a big reason behind it. At the expense of drinking water and irrigation the water from Sardar Sarovar and Indira Sagar reservoirs are being given to Coca Cola and other industries, is this the right use?"
"Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev and his followers who talk about the heritage of the river valley, do not mention the destruction and submergence of the centuries old river valley like Narmada with its ancient temples, mosques, archaeological treasures, and even a few million trees standing today. Isn’t that a big contradiction?", asks NBA.
Giving reason why he is not talking about all this, NBA says, "Sadhguru who has taken up to saving the rivers by spending millions of crores of rupees himself is accused of violation of many environmental laws in Tamil Nadu. Encroachment on the Kundakoi tributary of the river Noyal, construction of ashram with nearly one thousand buildings on the reserved forest, encroachment on the elephants corridors, are some of the acts he is involved in."
It adds, "There are many petitions filed before the court against him, which are in progress. In this regard, the government officials of Combatore district have confirmed these violations in affidavits and even given stop order."

Comments

Aman Sharma said…
Surprised to read this. Three points

1. Clearly, the NBA team has not read the 700 page document submitted to the gvt for river revitalisation. For their benefit, here is the link http://rallyforrivers.org/draft-policy
2. Sand mining issue has been covered in this document. Check page 17, point (g). Screenshot here https://www.dropbox.com/s/bam9ksl5vncgrf6/RFR%20Screenshot.jpg?dl=0
3. Asking why Sadhguru does not talk about the Narmada dam is like expecting him to expand the scope of the rally itself. The NBA should avoid imposing its agenda on others.

Aman Sharma
Twitter - @amancool5
The Thinker said…
Accusations are being floated left, right and center but not backed by facts actually. That Sadhguru has gathered millions of rupees in itself is an accusation not backed by any facts produced. Secondly the NBA team had clearly not gone through the Rally for rivers policy document .. the issues of farming failure, sand mining, etc. have been addressed in it. That NBA expects Sadhguru to support them is like forcefully imposing their idealogies on others.
Kumar said…
Respected Sirs, Its very clearly seen in your article that its articulated from the mind from which no fruitful solution comes out for the country and it always pull back if anything good happening in the country. Still you have time to change your mindset and be proud to be an Indian.

TRENDING

Misleading ads 'manipulate, seduce, lure' to market unhealthy harmful food

By Our Representative  The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPI) in its new report “50 Shades of Food Advertising” has sought to expose how seductive, luring, manipulative or deceptive these advertisements can be. Consequences of such advertising are increased intake of unhealthy food products that is associated with obesity and diabetes, it says. 

Why's Govt of India reluctant to consider battery storage system for renewal energy?

By Shankar Sharma*  If having so many small size battery energy storage system (BESS) at different locations of the grid, as in the report from Australia (a portfolio of 27 small battery storage projects across three Australian states that will total arounds 270 MWh), is considered to be techno-economically attractive in a commercially driven market such as Australia, the question that becomes a lot more relevance to Indian scenario is: why are our planners not in favour of installing such small size BESS at most of the distribution sub-stations not only to accelerate the addition of RE power capacities, but also to minimise the need for large size solar/ wind power parks, dedicated transmission lines and pumped storage plants; which will also minimise the associated technical losses.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

'Failure of governance': India, China account for 54% pollution-related deaths globally

By Vikas Parsaram Meshram*   A recent report jointly prepared by UNICEF and the independent research organization Health Effects Institute has been released, and the statistics within it are alarming. It states that in 2021, air pollution caused the deaths of 2.1 million Indians, including 169,000 children who hadn't yet fully experienced life. These figures are indeed distressing and raise questions about why there hasn't been more serious effort in this direction, putting policymakers to shame. 

New MVA-INDIA MPs asked to raise Maharashtra milk farmers' demand

By Our Representative  All-India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) national president Dr Ashok Dhawale and AIKS Maharashtra general secretary Dr Ajit Nawale have asked three newly-elected MPs of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA-INDIA) from the milk belt of Maharashtra Dr Amol Kolhe (NCP),  Bhausaheb Wakchaure (SS), and Nilesh Lanke (NCP), to take up the cause of milk farmers of Maharashtra in Parliament.  After congratulating them on their resounding victory over their BJP-NDA rivals, the AIKS leaders apprised them of the milk farmers struggle which is intensifying in the state under the leadership of the AIKS and the Milk Farmers Joint Struggle Committee, and requested them to support it. All three MPs agreed not only to support, but also to take the initiative in this struggle, an official AIKS communique claimed. Farmers in Maharashtra are currently getting as low as Rs 24-27 per litre for cow milk, which is being sold in the market for Rs 56-60 per litre, the AIKS leaders noted. The low price to farmer

Report suggests Indian democracy 'hasn't achieved' equitable economic decentralization

By Vikas Parsaram Meshram  The news that the current economic inequality in the country is worse than during British rule is unsettling. This suggests the harsh reality that our democracy has not achieved equitable economic decentralization. A recent report by Thomas Piketty and three other economists reveals shocking findings: in 2023-24, the top 1% of the wealthiest people in India hold 40% of the nation's wealth, with a 22.6% share in income.