Skip to main content

A recipe for new-look Ministry that would appropriately signal government priorities on markets and economy

By Anand Mazgaonkar*
A Government and Party that won a huge Parliamentary majority; managed to form State Governments even where it did not win elections; did not seem to take one wrong step; one that decimated the Opposition; had most of the print, electronic as well as gutter media in its pocket; one that fulfilled its promise of Congress-mukt Bharat by ‘sucking-like-a-magnet’ all opportunist Congressis as well as by imitating its culture of operating through coteries and cliques, rewarding favourites, harassing nay-sayers and letting loose goons in the streets and on social media, is suddenly having to scratch its head.
Party bigwigs are not ‘staying-in-line’, University students are not listening to them, even girls are revolting, police brutality hasn’t cowed them down, RBI report, demonetisation numbers, employment statistics, petrol and diesel prices, railway accidents, people asking questions about jumlas…
There cannot be anything wrong with Government performance. The problem must be with Rahu, Ketu, Shani Dosh, bad mahurat, missing auspicious moments while initiating actions etc. If a havan or some vastu tinkering with the Cabinet room doesn’t work and if bad news is becoming a pattern what can immediately be done is to not only reshuffle cabinet and portfolios, may be rename all the roles, responsibilities in keeping with the challenges Government faces every day.
Home, Finance, Defence. External Affairs, the old heavyweight portfolios don’t weigh that much any more. Remember? Sushma Swaraj had to put up a herculean fight for her Foreign Ministry. She discovered that it was a dud after she got it. In any case Ministers don’t seem to have clarity about what is expected of them.
Therefore, if the portfolios are rechristened at an auspicious time, a Shubh Mahurat decided by Nagpur, things will start looking up right up to 2019 elections. Then can then go back to sleep. Sorry, correction, Mr Modi can start his foreign junkets again and the rest of the Cabinet can go back to sleep. So, a new look Ministry that will usher us into jumlas and fireworks of 2019 elections can look like:
  • Minister for Tweets
  • Minister for Railway Accidents (including foot overbridge accidents, tunnel accidents)
  • Minister for Jumlas
  • Minister for Kadi Ninda
  • Minister for Student Violence (clarification: this would be for Violence on students and doesn’t imply violence by students)
  • Minister to manage Party Dissension
  • Minister for Gau Rakshaks
  • Minister for Social Media Goons
  • Minister for Cover ups (there’s a host of old crimes and cases that need to be dealt with)
  • Minister to stoke fire in election-bound States
  • Minister to dissuade people from using Social Media because Opposition parties are catching up
This new-look Ministry will send out the most appropriate signal on Government priorities to the Markets and the Economy. That has to be the way forward.
---
*With Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Ahmedabad

Comments

TRENDING

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.