Skip to main content

BJP "caught" in double talk: Having supported smaller states, it now seeks way out of the commitment

By Sadhan Mukherjee*
The pent-up demands for separate statehood by people in different parts of India are now bursting forth since the Gorkhaland demand has grown in dimension and effect. Last Saturday New Delhi was the venue where some of these new statehood demand protagonists met. This means that in the coming days, the demand is going to intensify, not die down.
BJP as usual is indulging in double-talk. BJP West Bengal state President has come out with a laughable argument. He has declared that BJP was not against smaller states. But since the proposed name is Gorkhaland, it means it will be a state for Gorkhas. But since other tribes in Darjeeling hills area have no objection, who is the sate BJP chief to object to the name. Since that is not a tenable argument, the state BJP chief has adduced the economic viability argument as well.
He does not take into account the proposed state’s income from tourism and royalty from tea gardens. Take a European country, Switzerland. Tourism gives that country an annual income of 35.5 billion Swiss Franc, or roughly 2360 billion in Indian rupees. Or take Monaco. Nearly 15% of its GDP of $5.8 billion (2011 data) comes from tourism. If you add the income of tea gardens royalties to Darjeeling hills state’s income from tourism, the amount becomes a substantial sum. Gorkhaland government when it is formed can go in for other sources of income as well. So both arguments of state BJP chief are untenable. Luxemburg, world’s smallest country, has Europe’s highest per capita income and has become Europe’s knowledge capital.
The other argument also is not factually correct. One can ask BJP state chief that how could a tribal state like Jharkhand state formed? It is not a single tribe state. Similarly, other tribes in Darjeeling hills besides Gorkhas are in the Gorkhaland movement. They have no objection to the name of Gorkhaland. Will the BJP chief have no objection if the proposed state is called Darjeeling Hills State?
Actually, BJP is now caught in double talk. Having supported “smaller states”, it now seeks a way out of that commitment. Hence, the argument on economic viability and single tribe state in Darjeeling hills.
The demand for smaller states has since snowballed. It is now voiced in as many as 13 of the 29 existing states and in 2 out of 7 union territories. It may be recalled that the British provinces in India were reorganised as States on the basis of language and ethnicity. And exactly these issues have now come up for further reorganisation of states.
The British left us with nine Part A states, eight Part B states and ten Part C states. Part A states comprised Assam, Bengal (divided later into West Bengal and East Pakistan), Bihar, Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. Part B states covered the Princely States: Hyderabad, Saurashtra, Mysore, Travancore-Cochin, Madhya Bharat, Vindhya Pradesh, Patiala and East Punjab States Union, and Rajasthan.
Part C states included Kutch, Himachal Pradesh, Coorg, Manipur and Tripura. Jammu and Kashmir was awarded a special status. The British administration’s scheme was untenable in Independent India. Demand grew for new states. When the Constitution of India was being formulated, this demand grew in intensity but New Delhi did pay heed.
It is only after the demand of separating Tamil-speaking areas of Madras reached a crescendo and Patti Sriramulu died after a 56-day fast. Only after his death did the demand fructify and the central government announced a States Reorganisation Commission in 1956 to reorganise the existing states on the basis of language. The Tamil speaking areas of Madras formed the Andhra Pradesh.

Further modifications were made; in 1960 Bombay was split into Maharashtra and Gujarat. Several states were made later at different times and as at the end of 2000, we had 29 States and 5 Union Territories.
Now the demands of linguistic states have come up again. Let us have a look at the demands statewise. In Assam the Bodos demand Bodoland. This demand was earlier moderated to some extent by setting up the 48-member Bodoland Territorial Council to govern the four Bodo majority districts under the Assam government. Now the Bodos want a separate state.
A similar demand is growing in Karbi Anglong district, formerly Mikir Hills, of Assam. This area has been practically without any development and no taxes were collected there. Now with modern civilisation coming to the hills, there is a great demand for development and independent rule.
In Bihar, there is a demand for a Bhojpuri state for Bhojpuri speaking people who are not only in Western Bihar but also in Eastern UP, Northern Chattisgarh and parts of Jhakhand.
The Maithil speaking people want a Mithila state that is to cover the 24 Maithili-speaking districts of Bihar and six Maithili speaking districts of Jharkhand.
In Gujarat, there is a demand for Bhilistan comprising the tribal regions of Bharuch. There is a demand for a Kutch state consisting of Kutch, the Great Rann of Kutch and Little Rann of Gujarat. Till 1956 such a state existed but later it was added to Gujarat.
The demand for a separate State of Saurashtra has grown since 1972 and was initiated by late Prime Minister Morarji Deai’s close aide Ratilal Tanna. Besides the linnguistic difference of Saurashtrian language with Gujarati, the people here have complaints about lack of development in the area.
Karnataka is not a single language-speaking area. It can be broadly divided into Karu Nadu, Kalyana Karnatka, Tulu Nadu, Mysuru, Konkana and Vijayanagara.
Jammu and Kashmir has demands for three separate states; this means Kashmir Valley, Ladakh and Jammu. The language spoken in Jammu is mostly Dogra, in Kashmir Valley it is Kashmiri while in Ladakh it is Ladakhi. The first two areas are ruled directly by the J&K government, Ladakh though a part of J&K is governed the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council. The BJP has promised the people of Ladakh the status of a Union Territory in October 2015 and on that basis won 18 out of 24 seats it contested, obtaining a clear majority.
Vindhya Pradesh was merged with Madhya Pradesh in 1956 but in 2000 the demand was revived for a separate Vindhya Pradesh. Since this did not find favour with many, now a demand for a separate Bundelkhand and Baghelkhand is gaining ground.
That is not all. There is the demand for Mahakoshal which has a distinct cultural identity. Within it there is a demand for Gondwana which was earlier ruled by Gond kings. In addition there is demand for a Malwa state which also includes Jhalawar districts of Rajasthan and parts of Banswara and Pratapgarh. The main language in this area is Malwi.
In Maharashtra, there are several demands for setting up separate states. Among these is Khandesh in north-western Maharashtra where former Deccan begun. Then there are demands for a Konkan state which covers the coastal districts of Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka. Two other regions of Maharashtra have similar demands: Marathwada and Vidarbha.
Then there is the demand for Delhi state, currently a Union Territory. The statehood demand covers the areas of Delhi, Meerut, Baghpat, Muzaffarnagar, Gurgaon, Sonipat, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Noida and Greater Noida. It will thus comprise 9 districts.
Another Union Territory that is facing a similar problem is Puducherry where Karaikal district wants to have a separate Union Territory. Another area, Konkan, wants to be a Union Territory comprising the Konkoni-speaking areas Raigad, Ratnagiri, Thane, Mumbai, Navi Mubai and Sindhudurg districts.
Kukiland or Kuki Hills used to be an independent state. It was occupied and merged with Manipur by the British rulers. Now the demand has been raised for a separate state.
In Orissa there is the demand for a separate state of Kosal which consists of the districts of Sundergarh, Jharsuguda, Debagarh, Sambalpur, Bargarh, Sonepur, Boudh, Bolangir, Nuapada, Kalahandi, Nabarangpur, Aathmalik subdivision of Angul district, and Kashipur block of Rayagada district.
In Tamilnadu, there have been demands for a separate Kongu Nadu comprising the territory of old Chera kingdom, parts of Southern Karnataka and Central-East Kerala.
Four states are proposed to come up by dividing Uttar Pradesh. It includes Awadh, Braj Pradesh or Harit Pradesh, and Purvanchal. UP is a huge area and Awadh state would cover over 50 million people. Harit Pradesh is demanded on the basis of the majority here speaking Braj Bhasha and the proposed area includes Bharatpur district of Rajasthan and Gwalior from Madhya Pradesh.
West Bengal has not only the demand for an independent Gorkhaland but also of Kamtapur which comprises the districts of Cooch Vihar, Jalpaiguri and Southern part of Darjeeling area including Siliguri.
There is another issue. Sindhis have demanded the separation of Sindh Province from Pakistan and the formation of a Confederation with India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi encouraged the idea and described it as an accomplishable idea. He even compared the idea with Jews having no land of their own and after 2500 years they had accomplished that idea (Speech at Chetichand celebration in Ahmedabad, 24 March 2012).
Thus there is no doubt that for BJP the chickens have come home to roost.
---
*Veteran journalist

Comments

TRENDING

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

"Misleading" satellite images being shared on Balakot surgical strike on Jaish camp

By Dr Vinay Kate*
With every passing day more questions are being raised about the surgical strike India did in Balakot as a response to Pulwama attacks. So far the Indian media has claimed mass casulaty of 300+ terrorists of Jaish-e-Mohammad in this surgical strike, but there is hardly any report from foreign media about the same.

Extreme repression, corporate loot, cultural genocide "characterise" India's tribal belt

Counterview Desk
As Lok Sabha polls approach, there is considerable ferment in one section of the population -- India's Adivasis, forming about 8.6 per cent of India's population. Things became particularly critical following the February 14, 2019 Supreme Court order, allegedly seeking to evict lakhs of tribals from their forest lands.

Industry in India "barely growing", export growth 0%, whither moral anchors?

Counterview Desk
In a sharp critique of the Modi government, the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), one of world renowned economist Prof Kaushik Basu, who is Professor of Economics and Carl Marks Professor of International Studies at Cornell University, has told students at the IIM-A’s 54th Annual Convocation on March 16, 2019 that they have a “special responsibility” on their shoulders, “the responsibility to reject narrow sectarianism, uphold scientific thinking, openness to new ideas, and freedom of speech.”

Gujarat model? Industrial effluents "invade" borewells, discharge coloured water in farms

By Rajiv Shah
In a major embarrassment for Gujarat model, of the 21 samples taken by officials of the state government's environmental watchdog Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) in two villages of Vadodara district and analyzed by its laboratory in Gandhinagar, the state capital, to find out pollution level in groundwater, 16 were assessed as highly contaminated – these were, in fact, found to be discharging reddish, brownish, reddish, or yellowish water.

Refugees as criminals? US govt report blames Amit Shah for calling Bangladeshis termites

Counterview Desk
The chapter “Freedom of Movement” of the US State Department’s “India 2018 Human Rights Report”, released recently, has criticized BJP chief Amit Shah for terming alleged Bangladeshis who may be in Assam as “termites”, because their names were struck down from the list of National Register of Citizens, under preparation in the state.
Pointing out that four million residents were excluded from Assam’s final draft list, leading to “uncertainty over the status of these individuals, many of whose families had lived in the state for several generations”, the report regrets, the Indian law does not even contain the term “refugee,” treating refugees like Rohingiyas as “any other foreigners.”
“Undocumented physical presence in the country is a criminal offense. Persons without documentation were vulnerable to forced returns and abuse”, the report says.
Text of the Freedom of Movement chapter: The law provides for freedom of internal movement, foreign travel, emigration, a…

Congress would win just 9 of 26 Lok Sabha seats: Gujarat Assembly segment-wise analysis

By Rajiv Shah
Even as the Congress plans its first working committee meet in Gujarat on February 28 after an almost 58 year gap, there is reason to wonder what is in store for India’s grand old party in a state which has been long been a BJP bastion – in fact ever since mid-1990s. Ahead of the then assembly polls in late 2012, talking with me, a senior Gujarat Congress leader, currently Rajya Sabha MP, frankly said he saw no reason why Congress would win.

"Pro-corporate" Supreme Court order on FRA would further marginalize Adivasis

By VS Roy David, JP Raju*
For millions of Adivasis and other traditional forest dwellers February 13, 2019 will go down in history as the day of apocalypse. This is like the proverbial Black Friday where millions of most marginalized people of India were ordered by malicious anti-people draconian Supreme Court order depriving them the life and livelihood by evicting them from their habitats.

Financial inclusion? Not micro-loans; India's poor "need" investment in health, education

By Moin Qazi*
India has grown into a global powerhouse. Its economy is soaring but the picture on the ground is still quite arid. The green shoots that you see are only a patch of its landscape. Most Indians are hapless victims of inequity. India is one country where intense poverty abounds in the shadow of immense wealth.

India, Pakistan told to eliminate nuclear weapons: N-war "would kill" 2 billion

Counterview Desk
The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), a non-partisan federation of national medical organizations in 64 countries, representing tens of thousands of doctors, medical students, other health workers, and concerned citizens, claiming to share the common goal of creating a more peaceful and secure world freed from the threat of nuclear annihilation, has warned that “an unprecedented global catastrophe” awaits the globe against the backdrop of warmongering in India and Pakistan.