Skip to main content

Right to dissent under stress, feel Delhi prefessors following ABVP attack on Ramjas event, Culture of Protest

By A Representative
The quiet and sprawling, though busy, campus of the Delhi University (DU) is in the throes of a new change. There is a strong flutter among students and faculty of the campus and DU-affiliated colleges, following the February 21 BJP students' wing Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) “attack” on a Ramjas College seminar, that the right to dissent has come under extreme stress.
A case in point is DU professor of English, Sachin Nirmala Narayanan, who teaches in Dyal Singh College. In a note he first circulated on a close WhatsApp group, but later made it public through Facebook, he what he saw on the campus – even a physically challenged colleague, whom he escorted in the campus late at night, was “badly roughed up.”
Coming to the controversial seminar held at the Ramjas College, he said, it was organized by the college’s literary society, and had “all the permissions for the topic and the speakers”, though adding, the organized had perhaps “erred in not inviting the representatives of the sangh (RSS/ABVP) who also has a lumpen culture of protest”.
Referring to the ABVP objection to allowing two Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students to be part of the penal discussion, Prof Narayanan says, “Whether one likes it or not Umar Khalid and Shehla Rashid are students with very good academic credential.” Both are are part of PhD programmes, and Umar was to speak his on PhD work on atrocities against adivasis in Bastar.

Even as the seminar was about to begin, Prof Narayanan says, many students were “attacked from behind with bricks and lathis by the ABVP goons.” In fact, ABVP people “tried to strangle” Prasanta Chakravarty, associate Professor, department of English, “with the muffler he was wearing by pulling on the two ends in the opposite direction and was beaten up.”
He adds, “Ramjas students and teachers were locked in and continuously threatened and attacked by ABVP for four hours inside the college. Chairs were hurled at two women teachers, the goons were openly looking for another male teacher of the college with brazen threats of violence.”
On the second day, February 22, when around 200 protesting students and teachers marched to the Maurice Nagar police thana, they were “subjected to a barrage of eggs, glass bottles and heavy stones on their way as well as in front of the thana in full view of the police”, says Prof Narayanan, adding, “They did not allow the injured students to lodge FIRs, targeted women continuously with sexual threats and raised communal, anti-Muslim slogans.”
In fact, he says, “The police who never detained the ABVP, then started physical attack on teachers, students and even the media personnel by around 6 pm in the name of detaining. Many women were manhandled by male police along with male protesters injuring and traumatizing all.”
Ayesha Kidwai, President, JNU Teachers' Association (JNUTA), and Pradeep K Shinde, Secretary, JNUTA, in a statement have said, the attack on Ramjas students “a larger pattern”, adding over the last couple of years, the universities in India have witnessed a consistent pattern of attack on the universities.”
They give the example of what happened previously in “Hyderabad Central University, Jadavpur University, JNU, the Central University of Haryana, Mahendragarh, and Jay Narayan Vyas University (JNVU), Jodhpur.
In a separate appeal, activists and experts have expressed their solidarity with the battered professors and students who have dared to stand up to “ABVP hooliganism”. Those who have signed include Prof Ankur Sarin of IIM, Ahmedabad; Aruna Roy of the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information; Binayak Sen of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL); Medha Patkar of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA); and Sandeep Pandey, visiting faculty, IIT, Gandhinagar.
Meanwhile, Abhishek Pratap Singh, a Delhi-based Sangh activist, has admitted, the ABVP objection was “not to the event but to the panel of speakers for the seminar”, which included Umar Khalid and Shehla Rashid, both from Kashmir. Delhi-based BJP leader Nupur Sharma has claimed she has “received images” from a DU professor “which supposedly depicted atrocities committed by Leftists on ABVP members”, commenting, “Never forget: Left kills our people in Kerala.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group?
There's a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content.
Please let me know. Cheers

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Arrests of Odisha activists raise wider concerns over criminalisation of dissent: CASR

By A Representative   A coalition of civil liberties, human rights, student, labour organisations,  Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), has condemned the arrest of Dr. Randall Sequeira, a doctor providing healthcare in Odisha’s Kalahandi and Rayagada districts, and Laxman Nayak, an activist associated with the Maa Mati Mali Surakhya Manch, and demanded their immediate release.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.