Skip to main content

Modi told: You are "not following" Vajpayee, who talked with Kashmiri separatists and won them over

By A Representative
AS Dulat, former Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) chief under Atal Behari Vajpayee between 2001 and 2004, has advised Prime Minister Narendra Modi to begin talking with his predecessor, Dr Manmohan Singh, to understand how Vajapayee successfully “engaged” Kashmiri leaders.
Regretting that this is exactly what Modi is not doing, Dulat, in an interview, says, today “it’s a sad, sorry spectacle”, with South Kashmir looking “particularly bad”, so bad that “at times it looks like it is a liberated zone. Even the army is not very comfortable going in there.”
One whose book “Kashmir: The Vajpayee Years, co-authored with senior journalist Aditya Sinha, created ripples for advocating a reduced military presence in the Valley, Dulat believes, Vajpayee was nearing a solution to Kashmir, something about which Dr Singh, as also former Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) Farooq Abdullah, know more than anyone else.
Praising Vajpayee, Dulat points towards the strong message he sent out to Kashmiris during his a visit to Srinagar. Answering a question at a press conference at the airport, “Why do we talk about constitutions? We talk within the bounds humanity.”
Dulat says, “That floored the Kashmiris. Every Kashmiri knows that when you are talking to the Government of India, can it be outside the Constitution? Would the home minister or prime minister of India talk outside the Constitution? But why do we have to rub that in?”
Pointing out that Vajpayee has become “revered in the Valley” as a symbol of “peace and understanding”, which is what “the Kashmiri looks for”, Dulat says, “When Modi became prime minister, the Kashmiris were happy because it was the same party.”
Regretting that Modi is refusing to follow Vajpayee, Dulat says, “The interesting thing that I find is that the BJP and now even the RSS revert to Vajpayee whenever convenient, but they don’t actually follow Vajpayee’s way. That is the catch.”
He adds, “Even Modiji has evoked Vajpayee from time to time. He did so after Mehbooba Mufti (J&K chief minister) came here, and somewhere in Madhya Pradesh, he said that yes, we have to follow Vajpayee. So Vajpayee comes out, but he’s not followed, unfortunately. And I think, he had shown a way and we need to follow that.”
Especially objecting to labeling Kashmiris as pro-Pakistan, Dulat, says, “When things are bad, everyone becomes pro-Pakistan. Hurriyat is pro-Pakistan. The BJP has a very short memory. The same Hurriyat when it was talking to the Government of India was labeled in Kashmir as Advani Hurriyat...”
Taking a dig a Modi raising Balochistan to counter Pakistan, Dulat says, “We have raised Balochistan now, fine, talk Balochistan. But the problem lies in Kashmir, when we have to talk Kashmir with Pakistan. If you want to follow the Vajpayee way, you should make an announcement that we are ready to talk to, let’s say, Hurriyat, and assign the job to Rajnath Singh, as Vajpayee did to Advani. Let Rajnath Singh talk to the separatists.”
“The most provocative thing from Delhi’s point of view is the Pakistani flag which is coming in. Now, these are not boys who want to go to Pakistan”, laments Dulat, adding, “This comes out of frustration, anger, hopelessness. So, why do we want to make the Kashmiris feel hopeless?”
“Today”, Dulat says, “The Kashmiri wants only azadi, the boys on the street, the streets want azadi. There is so much anger there and as Omar Abdullah said a few days ago, anger is only alive because we are not addressing the anger, and it will stay alive.”

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.