Skip to main content

Anti-Narmada dam oustees continue protest as MP govt issues alert on threat of flooding of Rajghat, Badwani

The bridge which has begun overflowing
By A Representative
Amidst Narmada waters rising in “feet and meters”, to quote anti-Narmada dam activists protesting against the alleged refusal to rehabilitate an estimated 15,500 project-affected families, the Madhya Pradesh (MP) government has issued an alert about possible flooding of low lying areas of Badwani and the nearby regions in upstream of the dam.
The alert has been issued even as the Gujarat government prepared itself to “celebrate” overflow of the Narmada dam as a result of huge waters gushing from the upstream. Already, thousands of tourists from across the state are rushing the overflowing dam.
The MP government alert has been sounded amidst two other big dams upstream of the Narmada dam, Omkareshwar Indira Sagar, opened their five and eight gates respectively. This became inevitable as the water levels of the Omkareshwar dam crossed 191 metres, and of Indira Sagar dam crossed 260.4 metres.
The warning comes as hundreds of activists sitting in protest on the banks of Narmada river at Rajghat, Badwani, since July 30, 2016. According to the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), which has organized the protest, the levels – 191 metres and 260.4 metres – of the two dams “had to be maintained” in order to ensure that there is no further submergence.
Meanwhile, the state government has evicted shopkeepers in the immediate downstream of Omkareshwar, which is also a religious-cultural centre, even as waters have reached Rajghat, submerging the first temple on the bank of Narmada.
The Narmada water rose from 15 to 17 feet above the Rajghat Bridge in less than 24 hours, cutting off villages in Dhar district on the opposite (northern) bank of the river from Rajghat in Badwani. Earlier, the gates of two smaller dams, Tawa and Bargi, on Narmada in MP, were opened to allow flood waters to move to the downstream.
At Rajghat, the satyagrahis are sitting in batches, in teams from four villages from four tehsils every day. In a symbolic gesture against refusal to rehabilitate thousands of Narmada dam oustees, they planted trees around Gandhi Samadhi. There is a strong fear that decades of trees may go into submergence.
A section of the Narmada satyagrahis knocked at the doors of Narmada Valley Development Authority (NVDA) in Badwani. Shouting slogans ‘no rehabilitation, no dam’, women and men belonging to several villages, Amlali, Pipri, Kasrawad, Pichhodi, Semalda and Ekalbara, sought answers to questioned on their status from the Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Officer.
They confronted the official claim of the Madhya Pradesh government that there is zero balance in rehabilitation. While the NBA activists said 15,500 oustees families remained to be rehabilitated, the official accepted that “at least 700” are yet to get land and/or compensation, as their applications are pending before the Grievances Redressal Authority (GRA), which is supposed to take complaints on rehabilitation.
Answering questions on disaster management plan, the official failed to show that any such plan exists for those living on the Narmada river banks and might go into submergence as the water levels rise.
The NBA commented, “It may be noted that there have to be District, State and Central Disaster Management Authorities which could plan and implement measures for mitigation and compensation as well as protection of thousands of families who are to face submergence.”
It adds, “No plan seems to be available with the state, though there is an order of the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court directing the state to prepare it for the whole of Narmada Valley.”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.