Skip to main content

West Bengal Left Front handing over 1,000 acres land in 2006 to Tata Nano "illegal", return it to farmers: SC

By Our Representative
In a crucial judgment, the Supreme Court has quashed the acquisition of 1,000 acres of land in Singur by West Bengal’s Left Front government in 2006 for Tata’s Nano project, saying it was “illegal” and “violation of law”. Civil rights organizations, backed by West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, had moved the apex court challenging the acquisition.
The Nano small car plant was shifted to Gujarat's Sanand district after Prime Minister Narendra Modi, then state chief minister, offered huge concessions, said to be to the tune of Rs 20,000 crore. While the acquisition was carried out by the Left government in West Bengal, after she came to power, Banerjee came up with the Singur Land Acquisition Act to return the land back to the farmers.
Called Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act, 2011, it allowed the Banerjee government to reclaim the 1,000 acres of land given to Tata Motors in 2006. The West Bengal High Court, hearing a petition, struck down the Act. However, civil rights organizations backing farmers and and Banerjee challenged the High Court order in the apex court.
Pronouncing the judgment, the bench, consisting of Justices V Gopala Gowda and Arun Mishra, directed the Banerjee government to hand over the land acquired from the farmers within 12 weeks. The bench ruled that the farmers, who got compensation from the state government need not return it because “they were deprived of their livelihood for the last 10 years”.
On May 5, even as reserving the judgment, the apex court had questioned the manner in which the land was allotted to Tata Motors “without adhering to the section 4 and 5 of the Land Acquisition Act which mandate public notice for receiving objections.”
The bench noted that the entire exercise was done by “bulldozing the law”, as the then West Bengal Cabinet, under the CPI-M-led Left government, suo motu cleared the allocation of the land identified by the automobile major without any notice to the people and hearing objections.
The apex court told senior lawyers, who appeared for Tata Nano, which was the main beneficiary of the 1,000 acres, that they could not argue that the farmers had “accepted the award so they cannot challenge the acquisition.”
Meanwhile, the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), the top apex body of tens of people's organizations, has called the the Supreme Court order “a land mark decision”, insisting, this “marks another chapter in the long history of resistances by the people’s movements against forcible land acquisition in name of public purpose for private corporations.”
“Singur marked a turning point in 2006 when the resistance against the special economic zones were just gathering steam and it emboldened our collective struggles all around”, NAPM, which supported the Singur farmers' struggle, said.
NAPM added, it fully agreed with Justice Gowda’s observation that the land acquisition for a private company to build a car plant doesn’t constitute “public purpose”, as it is “in line with what we have been saying for long and only vindicates our position”.
Pointing out that the judgment was also a setback to the Modi government, which wished to amend the land law of 2013 by doing away with social impact assessment and consent clauses, NAPM said, “The NDA government thrice brought Ordinances to amend the law to facilitate easy acquisition of the land for private corporations and for profiteering in the name of the public purpose.”

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Dalits in India, Blacks in US suffer 'similar' humiliation: Macwan drafts letter to Trump

Counterview Desk
Well-known human rights activist Martin Macwan, recipient of the prestigious Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Award in 2000, has drafted an open letter to US President Donald Trump following the disturbing turn of events with the murder of George Floyd, leading to widespread protests in the US. He has sought signatures of concerned citizens before sending it to Trump.

Gujarat link of controversial US doctor who 'forced' WHO quiz Trump's wonder drug

By Rajiv Shah
A top American doctor, Sapan Sharankishor Desai, born and raised in the “affluent” North Shore (Chicago) region of Illinois by Indian parents, at one point of time involved in NGO activity through the Desai Foundation dedicated to “improving” the lives of the impoverished in Gujarat, is in the eyes of a major international storm following his paper in a “Lancet” questioning Donald Trump-promoted drug hydroxychloroquine.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”