Government of India may move to remove gram sabha consent clause from the forest rights Act, 2006

After its decision to water down the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, passed in Parliament last year, the Government of India is said to be considering removal of the “consent” clause from the forest rights Act, 2006 as well. Popularly known as land acquisition Act 2013, which replaced more than a century old law wgucg allowed forcible land acquisition, two of its main provisions which the Centre seeks to remove from 2013 Act are social impact assessment and consent from 70 to 80 per cent of those sought to be displaced by a project.

Significantly, sources suggest, even before the BJP government came to power, the UPA had moved for complete removal of the consent clause from the forest rights Act, as the ministry of tribal affairs was considering clearances to projects without tribal consent as “illegal”. “In fact, the Prime Minister’s Office under Manmohan Singh had sought "legal opinion" in the matter of removing the consent clause”, the sources point out. It is expected that the Centre's new move would, therefore, face little political opposition.
Authoritative sources quoted the Prime Minister’s office to say that the Centre has been “discussing” possible ways to do away with the mandatory requirement of securing consent from tribal gram sabhas (village councils) before handing over forest land for industrial use. Once the proposal is ready, an amendment will be brought in Parliament, it is pointed out. While this is being done to quicken up clearances for industrial projects, according to one assessment, if with this, “cutting down of forests would be a political-bureaucratic discretion.”
The forest rights Act was passed by Parliament in 2006 and began being implemented in 2008, and one of its main focuses was to make the foresters prime owners of the forest area where they live. All those forest dwellers cultivated forest land before December 13, 2005 were to be made the rightful owners of the land and given land title. Thousands of applications by tribals all over India are currently pending before authorities demanding that their land should be "cleared". Even gram sabha consent for giving a nod was enough to hand over land.
According to sources, the first meeting on the issue of taking away the consent clause from the forest rights Act has already taken place, with officials suggesting that several ministries find it “extremely difficult” to implement major expansion projects in the tribal areas because of the “hindrance” stipulated in the forest rights Act. A major option being discussed is to replace “gram sabha consent” with “environmental public hearing” for an industrial project, which is nothing more than a consultative process, usually chaired by the district collector.
Meanwhile, the sources point out, the law ministry is being consulted in the matter. Officials concerned particularly want to know legal provisions which would require to be changed, as in their view large number of mining projects is on stake because of the tribal rights Act. “The law ministry's favourable advice would be used to contradict the legal view of the tribal affairs ministry”, the sources pointed out. The matter also “requires attention” as the Supreme Court in the Vedanta mining case approved of tribal village councils' consent.

Comments

World Hijab Day? Ex-Muslim women observe Feb 1 as No Hijab Day, insist: 'Put it on a Man'

I didn't know that there could ever be a thing as World Hijab Day until I received an email alert from Maryam Namazie of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB), stating that several ex-Muslim women's groups had observed the same day—February 1—as No Hijab Day! According to Namazie, the day "was created on February 1 as a direct response to World Hijab Day" to "illuminate the coercive and oppressive realities of the hijab as a pillar of sex apartheid and a war on women."

Google powered AI refuses to correct grammar of a 'balanced' piece on Trump sending chained immigrants to India!

This is a continuation of my blog on how, while the start-up-developed AI app DeepSeek is being criticized for consistently rejecting content related to China or Maoism, there appears to be no mention in Western media about why another app, developed by the powerful Google, Gemini, remains silent on Indian political issues.

Gujarat a police state? How top High Court advocate stunned a senior-most journalist

Rajdeep Sardesai, Anand Yagnik This is a continuation of my earlier blog on well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai's lecture in memory of the late Achyut Yagnik at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA). I was a little surprised when I received the intimation about the venue for the lecture.

5% poor in India? Union govt claim debunked, '26.4% of population below poverty line'

A recent paper, referring to the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2022-23 of the Government of India (GoI), has debunked the official claim that poverty has substantially declined. Titled "Poverty in India: The Rangarajan Method and the 2022–23 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey", the paper —authored by scholars CA Sethu, LT Abhinav Surya, and CA Ruthu—states that "more than a quarter of India’s population falls below the poverty line."

Why predictions of an imminent collapse of the Russian economy may be wrong

A veteran Canadian journalist, settled in Russia, stated in a Facebook post that President Donald Trump "is apparently listening to experts who tell him that Russia's economy is on the verge of 'imploding,' and if he just squeezes a bit harder," his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin "will fall into line."

Talking of increased corporate control over news, Rajdeep Sardesai 'evades' alternative media

When I received an intimation that well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai was to speak at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA) on February 2, my instant reaction was: I know what he is going to say—his views are quite well known; he wouldn’t be saying anything new. Yet, I decided to go and listen to him to catch his mood at a time when the media, as he (and I) knew it, is changing fast due to the availability of new technological tools that were not accessible even a decade ago.

Why burn Manusmriti? Why not preserve it to demonstrate, display historicity of casteism?

In a significant Facebook post, Rana Singh, former associate professor of English at Patna University, has revealed something that few seem to know. Titled "The Shudras in Manusmriti", Singh says, because Manusmriti is discussed so often, he thought of reading it himself. “This book likely dates back to the 2nd or 3rd century BCE, and the presence of contradictory statements suggests that it is not the work of a single author,” he says in his Facebook post in Hindi, written in 2022 and recently reshared.

How the middle classes are returning to the BJP fold, be it Delhi or Gujarat: Mahakumbh, Sitharaman's budget

Whatever reasons may be offered for the Aam Aadmi Party's defeat in Delhi—whether it was the BJP's promises of more freebies than AAP, the shedding of ultra-nationalist slogans, or the successful demolition of Arvind Kejriwal's "Mr. Clean" image—my recent interaction with a group of middle-class individuals highlighted a notable trend. Those who had just begun to sit on the fence were now once again returning to the BJP fold.

Gujarat's water anarchy? 16.7% of Narmada water going to industry, 33% of targeted area irrigated: Govt insider

The Narmada project is something that has always excited me, including how much water will be distributed and to which sector. A few days ago, when I was talking to a top Gujarat government insider, I was a little surprised when I was told that it is up to the “respective states to decide how much Narmada water they would distribute among various sectors” out of the total quota allocated to the four states—Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan—as per the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal award of 1979.

Search This Blog