Skip to main content

Pointed question by senior legal expert: Would Modi want armed forces special powers Act dropped?

By Our Representative
Will Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi seek to drop the current provisions of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act – under which Central forces are stationed in several states like Manipur, Assam, Jammu & Kashmir etc. for maintaining public order – in case he comes to power in Delhi? Senior Gujarat High Court advocate Mukul Sinha has obliquely suggested that this should happen logically if one agrees with the legal objections Modi has raised to the prevention of the communal violence Bill, which is proposed to be placed in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.
Wondering if Modi would like to "repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) on the ground that this law wholly violates the federal powers of these three states”, Sinha in a recent in-depth analysis (click HERE) on Modi’s opposition to the Bill has said, the revised version of the Bill says that in case the local district magistrate declares an area “disturbed and seeks the assistance of Central forces, Central Government can send armed forces to that area for maintaining public order.”
Even as saying that it is “ridiculous to expect a district magistrate to go against the state government and discharge his duties”, Sinha has accused Modi of fueling a “hypocritical debate”, Sinha says the CM has attacked the “toothless provision” to suggest that it would destroy the federal structure of the constitution. Sinha says, “Modi is shouting on top his voice that our Constitution does not permit the Centre to send forces to any state or make any law in this regard, thus questioning the legal basis of the communal violence bill”.
In fact, Sinha adds, Modi “is instigating several other state governments to oppose the bill on the ground that the law would curb the autonomous power of the state, thus dubbing it anti-federal.” He insists, “The entry no 2A of List 1 of Union list gives exclusive authority to the parliament to legislate for providing for deployment of any armed force of the Union in any state in aid of the civil power.” He adds, “Under this entry AFSPA was enacted. Under section (3) of AFSPA, if the governor of a state is of the opinion that it is necessary to use the armed forces in aid of the civil power, he or she could declare the whole or any part of such state to be a disturbed area.”
Pointing out that “under section (4), the armed forces could assume power to help the civil forces maintain public order”, Sinha insists, “Thus Modi’s claim that Centre cannot legislate or send central forces for maintaining public order in a state has no legal basis at all.” 
While not supporting the idea of Central forces directly intervening for maintaining public order in a state, as this would in fact depend on who really would be controlling the Centre, the senior advocate argues, “A far better idea would be create an independent statutory authority which should be empowered to monitor the communal situation in any part of the country and direct immediate deployment of central forces supervised by special officers under it. If the consent of the states are required to enact such a law, let consent be taken instead of rushing a toothless Bill.”
Modi in his letter to the Prime Minister opposing the Bill (for full text click HERE) had expressed “serious concerns” about its “constitutional validity, legality and efficacy.” He said, “To begin with, your government’s attempt to legislate on an issue of ‘law and order’ and ‘public order’ both of which are items in the List II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule betrays its contempt for the federal structure and the separation of powers.” 
He had added, “The Union List (List I) has 97 entries in it and you will agree that there are a whole range of issues in that list which are waiting for legislation. However, rather than addressing issues which are in its domain, the Government of India seems to be under some compulsion to encroach upon the issues in the State List. Is it because the implementation has to be done by the State Governments?”
Sinha observes, “A question that should perplex many of us, especially to those of us who understand the nuances of the Bill, is as to why Modi is opposing such a toothless piece of legislation which cannot prevent any organized violence against the minorities. Modi’s latest tweet asking all the state governments to oppose the bill despite the several amendments agreed to by UPA, exposes his fear that enactment of the law would act as a legal hurdle in the way of BJP’s future communal campaign of instigating communal violence as they did in Muzaffarnagar.”

In any case, Sinh adds, the Bill has “failed to address the fundamental reason as to how targeted violence against a particular community is carried out in a large scale. Without the active complicity of the government and its police force, no such violence can take place”, wondering, “Does the Bill give the Central government any statutory powers to reach armed forces to save the victims from the targeted violence aided and abetted by the State?”

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Now, top Gujarat "litterateur" close to Modi says: Godse was patriot, so was Gandhi

By Rajiv Shah
A little over a week after Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticized BJP candidate from Bhopal Pragya Thakur for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot saying he would never forgive her for the remark, a top Sangh Parivar ideologue, known to close to Modi in Gujarat, has supported her, saying her statement should be seen “within a context.” Thakur won from Bhopal by more than 3.5 lakh votes defeating her nearest rival, veteran Congressman and ex-Madhya Pradesh chief minister Digvijay Singh.

Opposition refuses to legally challenge EVMs amidst plans of "back to ballot" protest

Counterview Desk
Even as opposition to the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) allegedly to rig polls is growing, a group of prominent citizens who have come together to form the EVM Virodhi Rashtriya Jan Andolan has controversially called for a national protest against EVMs on May 30, demanding future elections should be held only on ballot paper.

When a Pak scribe said Modi has 'proved' Jinnah’s two nation theory right...

By Zafar Agha*
It was around nine in the morning on May 24, 2019, a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi stormed the Lok Sabha with 300-plus MPs. It was a call from a journalist friend, Muzamal Suhrawardy, from Lahore, Pakistan. I ignored the call. We liberals had a depressing day the previous evening as the opposition to Modi and BJP collapsed. The results belied reports from the ground and even assessments made by colleagues.

It's now official: Akshay Kumar has not been conferred honorary Canadian citizenship

By Our Representative
It is now official. Super-star Akshay Kumar has not been conferred any honorary citizenship by Canadian authorities, as claimed by him ahead of the 2019 elections. In reply to a query by Roshan Shah, who is a Canadian citizen living in Waterloo, Ontario, and belongs to Ahmedabad, the country’s authorities dealing with issues related with immigration, refugees and citizenship in Canada have said that only six persons have so far been granted honorary citizenship.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

If EC's credibility is under question, shouldn't one "assume" EVMs might be tampered?

Counterview Desk
Gauhar Raza, scientist, documentary film maker and poet; senior human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi of the Act Now for Harmony and Democracy (ANHAD); military veteran Major Priyadarshi Chowdhury (retd); and Sucheta De and Sandeep Saurav of the All India Students' Association (AISA), have asked “individuals, organisations and people's movements” to send their endorsement to an appeal they have prepared on Electronic Voting Machine (EVM).

Common thread of Modi, political Hinduism, nationalism? 'Contest' of ideas isn't over

By Salman Khurshid*
Losing the 2019 election and that too in a somewhat extreme manner has confronted us with unexpected challenges: Our leadership has naturally taken it very hard and to heart but with suggested options that we cannot imagine or contemplate. Hopefully the emotions will settle soon and give us the direction to pick up the pieces and march again.

Govt of India overestimated GDP by 2.5%, must restore reputational damage: Ex-CEA

By Rajiv Shah
Top economist Arvind Subramanian has said that changes brought about by the Government of India in data sources and methodology for estimating the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) since 2011-12 “has led to a significant overestimation of growth”. While official estimates place annual average GDP growth between 2011-12 and 2016-17 at about 7 percent, the actual growth may have been 4½ percent, ranging from 3 ½ to 5 ½ percent during the period, he adds.

Will minorities in India be 2nd class citizens? Wake up call: Be a 'communicating' Church

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
India today is at a defining moment of her history. There is so much that has taken place in the past five years (and particularly in the last ten days)- that several citizens of the country are genuinely concerned about the future of the country! Will democracy survive? Will key elements of the Constitution be changed?