Skip to main content

Gujarat CM office offers "evasive" reply to query on environmental clearance to Statue of Unity

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government, especially the chief minister’s office (CMO) appears  to be feeling shy of coming up with details on environmental clearance, if any, provided to the Statue of Unity, planned as the highest statue in the world in the memory of Sardar Patel. Instead of giving a written reply on the crucial issue to senior environmentalist Rohit Prajapati and other experts and activists who had sought in writing details of environmental clearance, a letter sent by the CMO to him evasively wants him to “contact” an additional secretary in the water resources department to “clarify” the state government’s position on the matter.
The CMO fielded a lower level official, a deputy collector, public relations, to forward the reply. The official also asked the additional secretary of the water resources department to “examine” Prajapati’s  representation and “take action as per the rules, and to provide details of the action taken to those concerned as directed.” Taking strong exception to the allegedly frivolous manner in which the CMO has sought to deal with the issue, a statement issued by the environmentalist has said, “It is clear the Gujarat government authorities responsible for processing and/or granting environment clearances are keeping silent, while the CMO refuses to provide an answer.”
The environmentalist insists, “While the Government of Gujarat has proposed a nationwide programme seeking to involve school trustees, principals, students and parents on December 15, 2013 to support the Statue of Unity project through the Run of Unity marathon, we would like to share our concerns, questions, and worries, including the glaring issues and procedural anomalies.” He adds, he, along with a host of other intellectuals and activists had asked, in writing, to the Government of India, with copies to the Gujarat chief minister and the Gujarat chief secretary, to provide details of the environmental clearance to the Statue of Unity.  
Written on November 7, 2013, raising concern about environmental, social and safety issues of the Statue of Unity project, he said, the intellectuals and activists had expected a clear answer from the Gujarat government in the matter. Yet, they received an evasive reply from the chief minister’s office (CMO), which “instead of being clear on its actions to see environmental clearance from the competent authorities forwarded our representation to the water resources department”.
In their letter V. Rajagopalan, secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), Government of India, the intellectuals and activists had said, the Statue of Unity near the Sardar Sarovar Dam in the river downstream from the dam, just 3.2 km from the Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary, was being built in in eco-sensitive zone and “involving massive infrastructure” and “without legally mandatory environment clearance, environment and social impact assessment or any public consultation process.”
Calling it “clearly illegal, in violation of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification of September 2006 and a number of national Green Tribunal (NGT) and court orders about such massive construction on the riverbed”, they had added, “On October 31, 2013, the foundation stone was laid for the project amidst huge fanfare and media attention. Tenders have been floated. Even the work for the Garudeshwar weir, proposed about 12 km downstream of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, began without any social or environmental impact assessment, public consultation and environmental clearance from the Environmental Sub Group (ESG) of Narmada Control Authority’s (NCA).”
Pointing out that the estimated cost of the project is more than Rs. 2,500 crore, they had added, the key issues that beg immediate scrutiny were:
(1)   The project needs environment clearance under the EIA notification of September 2006, but has not applied for or obtained the clearance at any stage.
(2)   The Shoolpaneshwar Sanctuary boundary is touching the Sardar Sarovar reservoir. Since the statue is only 3.2 kms from the Sardar Sarovar Dam, it is certainly nearby Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary.
(3)   The project involves construction in the river bed and proposed reservoir, close to sanctuary in eco-sensitive zone, and hence will have serious impacts on the ecology and environment. Hence, and EIA and EC is crucial.
(4)   The project will affect the downstream river, its biodiversity, people and livelihoods and other related aspects.
(5)   A comprehensive assessment of the environmental and social impacts of the Statue of Unity and its contribution to the cumulative impact of all the projects and activities in the area has not been done.
(6)   The project also needs public consultation, but none has happened so far.
(7)   During the construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam due to hard rock digging, the seismic area already carries the burden of artificial activity in the bed rock and added load in what is deemed geologically fault line area. Public reports on geotechnical and geological studies on the proposed site have raised issues of structural stability as well as safety.
In view of the above, they had demanded:
* Government of Gujarat should submit application for environment clearance and till that is obtained, not to do any work related to the project.
* Government of Gujarat should immediately stop planned Statue of Unity and direct them to stop all other activities related to the Statue of Unity.
* The foundation stone installation on October 31, 2013 for the Statue of Unity should be declared illegal, in violation of the EIA notification of September 2006 and the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.