Skip to main content

Gujarat CM office offers "evasive" reply to query on environmental clearance to Statue of Unity

By A Representative
The Gujarat government, especially the chief minister’s office (CMO) appears  to be feeling shy of coming up with details on environmental clearance, if any, provided to the Statue of Unity, planned as the highest statue in the world in the memory of Sardar Patel. Instead of giving a written reply on the crucial issue to senior environmentalist Rohit Prajapati and other experts and activists who had sought in writing details of environmental clearance, a letter sent by the CMO to him evasively wants him to “contact” an additional secretary in the water resources department to “clarify” the state government’s position on the matter.
The CMO fielded a lower level official, a deputy collector, public relations, to forward the reply. The official also asked the additional secretary of the water resources department to “examine” Prajapati’s  representation and “take action as per the rules, and to provide details of the action taken to those concerned as directed.” Taking strong exception to the allegedly frivolous manner in which the CMO has sought to deal with the issue, a statement issued by the environmentalist has said, “It is clear the Gujarat government authorities responsible for processing and/or granting environment clearances are keeping silent, while the CMO refuses to provide an answer.”
The environmentalist insists, “While the Government of Gujarat has proposed a nationwide programme seeking to involve school trustees, principals, students and parents on December 15, 2013 to support the Statue of Unity project through the Run of Unity marathon, we would like to share our concerns, questions, and worries, including the glaring issues and procedural anomalies.” He adds, he, along with a host of other intellectuals and activists had asked, in writing, to the Government of India, with copies to the Gujarat chief minister and the Gujarat chief secretary, to provide details of the environmental clearance to the Statue of Unity.  
Written on November 7, 2013, raising concern about environmental, social and safety issues of the Statue of Unity project, he said, the intellectuals and activists had expected a clear answer from the Gujarat government in the matter. Yet, they received an evasive reply from the chief minister’s office (CMO), which “instead of being clear on its actions to see environmental clearance from the competent authorities forwarded our representation to the water resources department”.
In their letter V. Rajagopalan, secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), Government of India, the intellectuals and activists had said, the Statue of Unity near the Sardar Sarovar Dam in the river downstream from the dam, just 3.2 km from the Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary, was being built in in eco-sensitive zone and “involving massive infrastructure” and “without legally mandatory environment clearance, environment and social impact assessment or any public consultation process.”
Calling it “clearly illegal, in violation of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification of September 2006 and a number of national Green Tribunal (NGT) and court orders about such massive construction on the riverbed”, they had added, “On October 31, 2013, the foundation stone was laid for the project amidst huge fanfare and media attention. Tenders have been floated. Even the work for the Garudeshwar weir, proposed about 12 km downstream of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, began without any social or environmental impact assessment, public consultation and environmental clearance from the Environmental Sub Group (ESG) of Narmada Control Authority’s (NCA).”
Pointing out that the estimated cost of the project is more than Rs. 2,500 crore, they had added, the key issues that beg immediate scrutiny were:
(1)   The project needs environment clearance under the EIA notification of September 2006, but has not applied for or obtained the clearance at any stage.
(2)   The Shoolpaneshwar Sanctuary boundary is touching the Sardar Sarovar reservoir. Since the statue is only 3.2 kms from the Sardar Sarovar Dam, it is certainly nearby Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary.
(3)   The project involves construction in the river bed and proposed reservoir, close to sanctuary in eco-sensitive zone, and hence will have serious impacts on the ecology and environment. Hence, and EIA and EC is crucial.
(4)   The project will affect the downstream river, its biodiversity, people and livelihoods and other related aspects.
(5)   A comprehensive assessment of the environmental and social impacts of the Statue of Unity and its contribution to the cumulative impact of all the projects and activities in the area has not been done.
(6)   The project also needs public consultation, but none has happened so far.
(7)   During the construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam due to hard rock digging, the seismic area already carries the burden of artificial activity in the bed rock and added load in what is deemed geologically fault line area. Public reports on geotechnical and geological studies on the proposed site have raised issues of structural stability as well as safety.
In view of the above, they had demanded:
* Government of Gujarat should submit application for environment clearance and till that is obtained, not to do any work related to the project.
* Government of Gujarat should immediately stop planned Statue of Unity and direct them to stop all other activities related to the Statue of Unity.
* The foundation stone installation on October 31, 2013 for the Statue of Unity should be declared illegal, in violation of the EIA notification of September 2006 and the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...
2 comments
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.
Post a Comment
»

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”
Post a Comment
»

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 
Post a Comment
»

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.
Post a Comment
»

Saffron Kingdom – a cinematic counter-narrative to The Kashmir Files

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  “Saffron Kingdom” is a film produced in the United States by members of the Kashmiri diaspora, positioned as a response to the 2022 release “The Kashmir Files.” While the latter focused on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and framed Kashmiri Muslims as perpetrators of violence, “Saffron Kingdom” seeks to present an alternate perspective—highlighting the experiences of Kashmiri Muslims facing alleged abuses by Indian security forces.
Post a Comment
»

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).
Post a Comment
»

From lazy to lost? The myths and realities behind generational panic about youth

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak   Older generations in many societies often describe the young with labels such as “lazy, unproductive, lost, anxious, depoliticised, unpatriotic or wayward.” Others see them as “social media, mobile phone and porn addicts.” Such judgments arise from a generational anxiety rooted in fears of losing control and from distorted perceptions about youth, especially in the context of economic crises, conflicts, and wars in which many young lives are lost.
Post a Comment
»