The fall of Bankipur: What Prashant Kishor's victory means for Bihar

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan 

For nearly three decades, Bankipur was regarded as one of the Bharatiya Janata Party's safest urban constituencies in Bihar. Winning the seat had become almost routine for the party, which cultivated an aura of electoral invincibility in the heart of Patna. That perception has now been dramatically overturned. Jan Suraaj Party founder Prashant Kishor defeated the BJP by nearly 19,000 votes in a by-election that may prove to be far more consequential than the victory of a single legislator.

The significance of this result extends well beyond the margin of victory. It marks the Jan Suraaj Party's first-ever Assembly seat after the party failed to win any constituency despite contesting 238 of Bihar's 243 Assembly seats in the 2025 Assembly elections, although it secured nearly 3% of the statewide vote. Bankipur has therefore transformed Jan Suraaj from a political experiment into a credible electoral force.

The symbolism is even greater because of what Bankipur represents. Formerly known as Patna West before the 2008 delimitation exercise, the constituency has been a BJP bastion since the mid-1990s. Late BJP leader Nabin Kishore Sinha represented the seat four times, while his son, Nitin Nabin, won it five consecutive times before vacating it following his election to the Rajya Sabha in March 2026. As the BJP's National President, Nitin Nabin made Bankipur more than just another Assembly constituency—it became a matter of the party's political prestige. Losing such a fortress inevitably raises questions that extend far beyond one by-election.

The verdict also appears to reflect a deeper shift in voter sentiment. Conversations with residents suggest that many voters were less motivated by enthusiasm for one candidate than by dissatisfaction with the status quo. Hare Ram Mishra, a retired government employee living near Gandhi Maidan, summed up the prevailing mood when he remarked, "We voted for change. The BJP had begun taking Bankipur voters for granted after winning here continuously for over three decades."

Similar views were echoed across commercial neighbourhoods such as Kadamkuan. Rajesh Kumar Singh, a trader who had traditionally supported the BJP, said he voted for Prashant Kishor because he was disappointed by the lack of visible constituency development, the growing disconnect between elected representatives and citizens, concerns over governance, and the handling of student protests in Bihar and Delhi. Whether these sentiments were universal is debatable, but they indicate that anti-incumbency had penetrated one of the BJP's strongest urban strongholds.

Political observers believe Prashant Kishor's victory was made possible by an unusual coalition that cut across Bihar's traditional caste and political alignments. Sections of Brahmin and Bhumihar voters, who have long formed part of the BJP's social base, are believed to have shifted towards Jan Suraaj, although the BJP appears to have retained considerable support among Kayasthas, the community to which Nitin Nabin belongs. That alone, however, proved insufficient.

Perhaps the most striking development was the reported tactical voting by sections of Muslim and Yadav voters, communities that have traditionally supported the Rashtriya Janata Dal. According to local residents and election observers, many chose to back Prashant Kishor instead of the RJD candidate, Rekha Gupta, in an effort to consolidate the anti-BJP vote. As local resident Irfan Alam put it, "If Muslims and Yadavs had voted traditionally for the RJD, it would have benefited the BJP. Instead, many voted for PK with the objective of defeating the BJP." If this assessment is accurate, it represents a rare instance in Bihar where strategic voting overrode conventional party loyalties.

Young voters also appear to have played an important role. Bankipur had recently emerged as one of the centres of large-scale student protests over recruitment examinations, alleged paper leaks, administrative irregularities, and police action against demonstrators. For many first-time voters, the by-election reportedly became an opportunity to register their dissatisfaction. National studies by Lokniti-CSDS have consistently shown that younger voters increasingly prioritise employment, education, governance, and accountability over traditional caste loyalties. The Bankipur result suggests that this broader trend may now be influencing electoral outcomes in Bihar as well.

The BJP, by contrast, appears to have entered the contest with considerable confidence. Party workers reportedly arranged nearly 200 kilograms of laddoos before counting had concluded, reflecting the widespread belief that Bankipur was simply unwinnable for the opposition. Yet confidence can sometimes blur into complacency. Jan Suraaj leaders alleged that some BJP workers openly remarked during the campaign that "even a cat or dog could win Bankipur on a BJP ticket." Whether such claims were exaggerated or not, they reinforced the opposition's narrative that the constituency was being taken for granted.

What makes the defeat particularly noteworthy is that even some BJP leaders privately acknowledged internal dissatisfaction. One senior party leader, speaking anonymously, admitted that sections of the BJP's own supporters were unhappy with recent developments and chose to vote for Prashant Kishor. Bihar BJP President Sanjay Saraogi also stated that the party would review the reasons behind the defeat. Such admissions lend weight to the argument that the BJP may have lost as much because of erosion within its traditional support base as because of the opposition's mobilisation.

Prashant Kishor deserves credit for framing the campaign differently from conventional Bihar elections. Rather than relying primarily on caste arithmetic, he repeatedly appealed to governance and accountability. He urged voters to treat the election as a referendum on the BJP's performance, arguing that victory for Jan Suraaj would signal the need for political introspection. He also appealed directly to Bankipur's educated electorate, asking them to vote for the best candidate rather than merely a party symbol. That issue-based message appears to have resonated with a significant section of urban voters.

The BJP recognised the seriousness of the contest and deployed substantial organisational resources. Nitin Nabin undertook extensive door-to-door campaigning in the constituency, the BJP National President visited Patna repeatedly during the campaign, and Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary also invested political capital in the election. Yet intensive campaigning proved insufficient to overcome voter dissatisfaction.

It would be premature to interpret one by-election as evidence of a statewide political realignment. By-elections often produce outcomes shaped by local dynamics that are not replicated in general elections. Nevertheless, Bankipur has delivered a message that deserves attention. No constituency, however secure it may appear, remains permanently loyal to any political party. Voters are increasingly willing to cross caste and ideological boundaries when they believe governance has stagnated, accountability has weakened, or political leaders have grown disconnected from their constituents.

For Prashant Kishor, the victory validates years of political groundwork and gives Jan Suraaj its first legislative foothold. For the BJP, it serves as a reminder that organisational strength and historical dominance cannot substitute for sustained engagement with voters. Democracies are ultimately sustained not by political fortresses but by public confidence. Bankipur has demonstrated that even the strongest fortresses can fall when voters decide that change is preferable to continuity.

---

The author is a freelance content writer and editor based in Nagpur. He is also an activist and social entrepreneur, and co-founder of TruthScape, a collective of digital activists working to counter disinformation on social media