Skip to main content

Union budget's 'Hindutva gift' to corporates: Whither redistributive tax policy?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak
 
On July 23, Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Union Budget (2024-25) which highlights the priorities of Hindutva politics of economic growth sans human development. The Modi-led BJP government, along with its finance minister, continues to pursue failed and rejected neoliberal economic policies, including the reduction of corporate taxes, in an attempt to spur economic growth. 
However, the historical evidence suggests that corporate tax cuts have not effectively stimulated economic growth. Despite this, neoliberal capitalists and their corporate allies persist in advocating for these tax reductions, arguing that they lead to increased profits and economic expansion. In reality, these policies often result in greater income inequality and benefit large corporations at the expense of the working people. 
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) studies have revealed that taxes have no significant effect on economic growth in the USA. They also found that higher tax rates contributed to economic growth in the USA after the Second World War. Most reliable studies on the relationship between tax cuts and economic growth show that there is no significant relationship between the two. 
Corporate tax cuts have been found to have an insignificant to zero effect on economic growth. Even the biased empirical studies of institutions like the World Bank and the Tax Foundation indicate that a 10 percentage point reduction in corporate tax rates contributes only 0.2 percentage points to annual GDP growth. This insignificant and imprecise contribution of tax cuts to GDP continues to be the opium of Hindutva politics, which competes in the global race to cut taxes to uphold corporate interests.
Despite all international experiences and evidence, Hindutva politics continue to support corporate interests while the people suffer from unemployment, hunger, homelessness, and poverty. The lowering of corporate taxes encourages corporations to save for their own investments, which circulates corporate capital for profit accumulation. Therefore, corporate tax cut is not a social good but a saving gift to corporates.
The Indian Budget 2024 is a Hindutva gift to corporates, while it designs systems that put students, farmers, and entrepreneurs into debt traps created by banks, furthering the interests of an unproductive, rent-seeking economy. Students need scholarships, fellowships and good academic infrastructure to study and gain skills that contribute to India's economic and social development. However, the budget's provision of loans to students is likely to create a debt trap for them, with banks emerging as the net beneficiaries.
Similarly, the credit line extended to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) will likely only create debt traps for entrepreneurs. This approach fails to create conditions for innovative development and does not provide the necessary support for MSME leaders to thrive. Instead of fostering genuine growth and innovation, these measures merely increase the financial burden on small business owners, leaving them struggling under the weight of debt rather than contributing meaningfully to the economy.
The corporate tax reduction is not the final gift of Hindutva politics to corporate capitalism. Hindutva leadership have also promised to tax reform which is an obsession of every radical bourgeois represented by Modi and his finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman. 
The reduction of corporate taxes is bourgeois socialism of Hindutva variety which robs the pockets of working people for corporate saving in the name of economic growth. Critics argue that a more balanced approach, including investments in social infrastructure and equitable taxation, would better serve the country's economic interests and lead to sustainable growth.
The credit line extended to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises will likely only create debt traps for entrepreneurs
The tax policies can be a tool for redistribution. Such a proposal is not even radical redistribution but by ensuring that corporations and wealthy individuals pay their fair share, the government can generate revenue to fund social programs, infrastructure, education, and healthcare. 
Such redistributive tax policies can help reduce income inequality and provide more opportunities for marginalised and disadvantaged groups. Instead of relying on debt-inducing schemes, a focus on equitable taxation and investment in public services could lead to more sustainable and inclusive economic growth.
The praxis of Hindutva politics continues to neglect the broader goals of mass welfare and the long-term transformation of Indian society towards economic and social equality. Rather than addressing the pressing needs of the working people and striving for a more equitable distribution of wealth and opportunities, Hindutva politics is increasingly focused on supporting and promoting the interests of large corporations. Tax cut is just an example. 
This approach prioritises the establishment and maintenance of corporate dominance within the country, often at the expense of the common citizen's needs and rights. By doing so, it helps in widening the gap between the rich and the poor, undermining the principles of democracy and social justice. 
The emphasis on corporate hegemony suggests a shift away from policies that can promote inclusive growth and social harmony, raising concerns about the future direction of India's socio-economic development under the directionless leadership of Hindutva politics and economy.

Comments

TRENDING

Andhra team joins Gandhians to protest against 'bulldozer action' in Varanasi

By Rosamma Thomas*  November 1 marked the 52nd day of the 100-day relay fast at the satyagraha site of Rajghat in Varanasi, seeking the restoration of the 12 acres of land to the Sarva Seva Sangh, the Gandhian organization that was evicted from the banks of the river. Twelve buildings were demolished as the site was abruptly taken over by the government after “bulldozer” action in August 2023, even as the matter was pending in court.  

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Outreach programme in medical education: Band-aids for compound fractures

By Amitav Banerjee, MD*  Recently, the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India, introduced two curricular changes in medical education, both at the undergraduate and the postgraduate levels, ostensibly to offer opportunities for quality medical education and to improve health care accessibility among the underserved rural and urban population.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Will Left victory in Sri Lanka deliver economic sovereignty plan, go beyond 'tired' IMF agenda?

By Atul Chandra, Vijay Prashad*  On September 22, 2024, the Sri Lankan election authority announced that Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) alliance won the presidential election. Dissanayake, who has been the leader of the left-wing JVP since 2014, defeated 37 other candidates, including the incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe of the United National Party (UNP) and his closest challenger Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya. 

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.