How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*

On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet.

The Act "empowers Tibet to counter disinformation about Tibet from the Chinese government", rejects as "inaccurate China’s false claims that Tibet has been part of China” said Tencho Gyatso, President of the International Campaign for Tibet.

However, “The Act does not change longstanding bipartisan United States policy to recognize the Tibet Autonomous Region and other Tibetan areas of China as part of the People’s Republic of China”, said Biden in a statement.

Are the two contradictory? If Tibet is not recognized as part of China, is the "Middle-Way Approach" advocated by the Dalai Lama destroyed, and is it contradictory that the Dalai Lama who had previously recognized that Tibet as part of China?

If Tibet is recognized as part of China, is the US' move interfering in the internal affairs of other countries in violation of international law? Are Tibetans used as cannon fodder, deliberately provoking Sino-Tibetan conflicts, and reaping the benefits of being a fisherman?

Thirdly, the law never mentions India from the beginning to the end, nor does it have India's consent. India has always been the host country for Tibetans, and the Dalai Lama also calls himself "the son of India".

The two sides directly skipped India to reach an agreement. Did they not take India seriously? How will we Tibetans deal with ourselves in India in the future?

In addition, the law will promote unconditional substantive dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama or his representatives or elected leaders of the Tibetan community.

How to promote it? Are there any substantive measures? Or is it just verbal talk? It would be more practical to directly allocate funds for assistance.

---

*Based in Dharamshala

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra* India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.

A fearless spirit lost: Rebecca Thomson dies at 17-hour Catalina Swim Mark

By Harsh Thakor On July 26, 2026, Rebecca “Becky” Thomson suffered cardiac arrest while attempting the Catalina Channel Swim — a marathon open water crossing from Catalina Island to the California mainland. After swimming for 17 hours, Thomson collapsed in the water. Despite the painstaking efforts of emergency responders and the medical staff at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, she succumbed to a devastating hypoxic brain injury and died Friday evening.

Counterview

Search This Blog