The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Gujarat, organised an event in Ahmedabad entitled “Remembering Fr. Stan Swamy in Today’s Challenging Reality” in the memory of Fr. Stan Swamy on his third death anniversary. The event included a discussion of the new criminal laws enforced since July 1, 2024.
At the start of the event Fr. Cedric Prakash spoke about Fr. Stan Swamy, a fearless defender of tribal rights in Jharkhand, who was arrested by the NIA in 2018 in the context of the Bhima Koregaon case.
Human rights defenders and members of political parties across the nation had protested the arrest of the then 81-year-old activist who had worked tirelessly with Adivasis to defend their rights. He passed away on July 5, 2021 at the Holy Family Hospital, Mumbai, due to complications related to Covid while still under arrest, said Prakash.
Advocate Lara Jesani of the Bombay High Court delivered the keynote address and discussed the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) which have replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act, respectively and their implications for citizens’ rights.
She expressed serious concern regarding the manner in which the Law Commission was bypassed, views of public and experts not considered in the process of overhauling the criminal jurisprudence of the country, by just entrusting the task to a five member committee.
It was strange that when 80-85% of the BNS, BNSS and BSA was taken verbatim from the erstwhile CRPC, IPC and the Indian Evidence Act and just reorganised, rather than “decolonised” as claimed, that the laws were replaced when the limited changes could have been brought through amendments as was being done from time to time, she added.
While examining the new criminal laws, Jesani expounded on the issues they throw up, some key ones being:
(i) the discretion given to the police to conduct a preliminary investigation before deciding whether an FIR should be filed,
(ii) the vagueness in the number of days of police custody that could be granted which could result in a situation where the earlier provision limiting to the first 15 days could be now extended to 60 or 90 days, and thereby almost pre-closing the possibility of bail during this entire period
(iii) the introduction of provisions from anti-terror law UAPA into the BNS, the introduction of the controversial sedition-like law in a graver and more dangerous form,
(iv) criminalisation of hunger strike by protestors, and
(v) the admissibility of electronic evidence without any safeguards for privacy and data protection or procedures for seizure of devices and integrity of device and data, and other provisions which give arbitrary and sweeping powers to the police.
The way Stan Swamy was incarcerated shows, new criminal laws could be used to snatch away civil liberties and fundamental freedoms of citizens
Jesani said that not only would these ill-conceived changes brought about through the new criminal laws lead to chaos in court and increased litigations in an already stressed legal system, but they are regressive and contradict the law laid down in several landmark Supreme Court judgements like in the case of DK Basu, Joseph Shine and Lalita Kumari, and are violative of fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Activist Nirjhari Sinha spoke on how these laws could be used to curtail the freedom of speech, especially of independent media and fact-checkers. The window of 15 days given to the police to investigate and ascertain prima facie the commission of an offence would have far-reaching implications on ensuring justice in cases of sexual violence.
Advocate Amrish Patel emphasized how the procedural law in the earlier criminal jurisprudence flowed from Article 21, which has been overturned by the new laws.
Advocate Shamsad Pathan said that the struggle of the minorities to make their voices heard in the context of the spread of hate speech and targeted violence would be seriously affected as a result of the sweeping powers given to the police in the new criminal laws.
Activist Kishor Chaudhury said that the impact of the new laws was already being felt in the Adivasi community. The police already cited the new laws when the Adivasi organizations informed them about the Indigenous Day celebrations on 9th August; and that Adivasis should limit to their ‘cultural programmes’ on this day and not any political demonstrations.
Trade union leader Ashim Roy was positive that the various stakeholders, especially the legal fraternity and civil society activists, would stand up against the new criminal laws and spearhead a collective, democratic and transparent process that would compel the government to withdraw the new criminal laws.
I told the meet that the manner in which Fr. Stan Swamy was incarcerated under draconian laws were an indication of how the new criminal laws could be used to snatch away civil liberties and fundamental freedoms of citizens.
I expressed my apprehension that the changes in procedural law as envisaged in the new criminal laws could have serious implications on laws like the SC&ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The new laws would be instrumental in suppressing the on-going struggles of the Dalit and Adivasi communities for justice.
---
*PUCL Gujarat, General Secretary
Comments
Post a Comment
NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor