Skip to main content

Allahabad police 'blocks' women activists' move to commemorate anti-British Rani

By Our Representative 
In an unusual move, the Allahabad police on March 17 blocked commemoration of 200 years of courageous resistance against British imperialism by Rani Chennamma of Kittur, Karnataka, whose valour is compared with Rani Lakshmibhai of Jhansi.
The programme, part of the national campaign I Too Am Rani Chennamma was to take place on 17th March from 11am-3pm, Dharna Sthal, Civil Lines, Prayagraj (formerly Allahabad) to celebrate the legacy of Rani Chennamma.
The organisers were informed late on 16th March by the police that they will not allow them to do the programme. Despite reaching out to senior police officers and knocking at the doors of the District Magistrate late night, “no logic worked with the UP Police”, alleged a senior activist.
The chowki in charge sitting at the Dharna Sthal told the organisers, “You cannot display this exhibition here”, after he was shown the panels containing stories of women who fought against the Britishers and those who were part of writing the Constitution of India.
A media communique from the organisers of the programme alleged, “It was obvious that such women had no place in present Uttar Pradesh… Over 600 women were expected to participate in the programme from various backgrounds”, adding, “Before Allahabad the programme has been organised in more than 10 places across India.” The campaign was launched at Kittur Fort, Karnataka on February 21 in the presence of 3,500 women.
“We strongly condemn this act of the UP police and register our protest against the autocratic regime in power. The arbitrary unfairness at the eleventh hour and refusal of permission to peace loving women, decision to block the commemoration programme by the police violates our fundamental right to speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a), & to assemble peaceably under Article 19(1)(b)”, the communique said.
The idea to commemorate 200 years of Rani Chennamma’s revolt was initiated by Delhi-based human rights group, Anhad. Several women's groups and independent citizens from across India joined hands in the campaign in memory of the Rani’s struggleagainst oppression and to it carry forward.
Kittur's Rani Chennamma was one of the first women to lead a revolt against British rule in India. A fearless warrior, she stands tall as a symbol of resistance, embodying a love for freedom and self-respect, against the British rule.This year 2024 marks 200 of her revolt against British imperialism.
The UP police’s decision to block the campaign in Prayagraj effectively banned the display of the exhibition containing stories of valour and fearlessness of Rani Chennamma, Rani of Jhansi , Uda Devi Pasi, Begum Hazratmahal, Capt Luxmi Sahgal, Rani Avantibai Lodhi, Jhalkari Bai, Kamla Chaoudhary, Savitribai Phule , Fatima Shaikh, Sarojini Naidu, Aruna Asif Ali and others.
Shabnam Hashmi
“The Model Code of Conduct is being misused across India by those in power to crush all democratic activities. Those sitting in positions of power deliberately mislead people into believing that it means automatic implementation of section 144 which is absolutely wrong”, the communique insisted.
“Model Code of Conduct is meant for political parties and there are certain norms to be followed. It does not mean shutting down of all democratic activities”, it added.
In a statement, Anhad founder Shabnam Hashmi said, "The level of misinformation is so much that even activists, academics, politicians themselves believe that once Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is announced, you cannot do public programmes. This is absolute misinformation and a tool to curb dissent and democratic voices ."
Stating that there is "also no connection between MCC and section 144 CrPC", she underscored, "Section 144 CrPC does not automatically become applicable unless  specially announced for a particular area/ areas." 
Hashmi insisted, activists should not "give in to false propaganda by the police and administration. MCC is applicable to political parties and politicians. It is a set of rules to be followed while organising programs. Please read https://www.eci.gov.in/mcc/".

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".