Skip to main content

Why name of powerful Maratha Admiral of coastal navy got lost in mainstream history

By Pragya Ranjan* 

The history of India had been under the 200-years of British Raj viewed through a Eurocentric lens. Many leaders and historians have tried to deconstruct the imperialist agenda of history as a writing to glorify British Raj. But even after independence, history written from the point of view of the European colonialists still has a significant mark on contemporary writing on Indian history. 
The Rise and Fall of a Brown Water Navy: Sarkhel Kanhoji Angre and Maratha Seapower on the Arabian Sea in the 17th and 18th Centuries’ is one such book which demonstrates how Indian naval history continues to remain Eurocentric. The name of Sarkhel Kanhoji as a powerful Maratha Admiral of coastal water navy seems to be lost in the mainstream history of India.
Written by Anirudh Deshpande, Professor of History at University of Delhi and Muphid Mujawar, Assistant Professor at Shivaji University; the book is divided into seven chapters and covers about 150 pages. 
It is a scholarly work which provides a significant insight into Indian naval and military history by examining the case of Angre family. It also sheds light on how the Indian brown water navy proved to be detrimental to the European blue water navy for a long time, something which seems impossible in the contemporary world.
The Brown Water Navy operates in the coastal waters and in the case of India, generally bound by an authority on the mainland. The Blue Water Navy on the other hand is a maritime force operating on the high seas at a global level. 
In India, the only attempt to organise a blue water navy was made by Tipu Sultan that could challenge the British Navy in high seas. But before he could succeed, he was ultimately defeated and killed by Lord Wellesley in the fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799). The navy in India under various rulers other than Tipu Sultan had remained confined to coastal and internal waters.
The general impression that the coastal water navy of India was no match to the European naval power is wrong, especially taking Kanhoji Angre’s power into consideration. In fact the defeat of Tulaji Angre, son of Kanhoji Angre, would have been very difficult or even impossible without Maratha Peshwa’s support. 
The fall of Angre’s naval power was not a cakewalk for the Britishers. In fact, it was a feat achieved after losing many of their ships and men as prisoners to Angre. Deshpande and Mujawar describe this book on the history of Maratha Navy as a microhistory which puts bigger historical generalisations to a severe test.
Starting from the advent of British and Portuguese in India, the book takes us to the journey of Sarkhel Kanhoji Angre whose political ascendancy as Admiral of Maratha Navy began under the third Chatrapati, Rajaram. Not only was he a brave and patriotic leader but also demonstrated his political acumen through the imposition of the ‘dastak system’ for foreign vessels on the Konkan coast. 
It was a parallel system of “passes which had to be procured from the Angre center of power by ship which sailed along the Konkan and Malwan coast” as opposed to the ‘cartaz system’ of Portuguese in the Indian Ocean.
History of Maratha Navy and Angre family is an enlightening reading for a layman interested in colonialism and naval history
Failing to get a pass, it would eventually lead to seizure of the vessel by Angre’s navy on the Konkan coast. In this way, Kanhoji got hold of numerous British and Portuguese ships, sometimes loaded with goods amounting to lakhs of rupees. It was one of the main reasons for the Britishers to refer to Kanhoji as “Conajee Angra, a Savajee pirate” and “chief robber”.
The authors say, “The colonialist assertion that any so-called non-state actor who resisted the rise of British power in India was a pirate or brigand”, another instance of Eurocentrism. Kanhoji political acumen is further discerned through his decision to continue with dual control (du-tarfa amal) with Siddis of Janjira, “his strongest competitors in commerce raiding.” It was against the wishes of Chattrapati Sahu who wanted the Siddis to be completely crushed but Kanhoji knew that it was impossible to completely defeat them.
In India, a naval power, was closely tied to a land authority; in the case of Kanhoji Angre it meant Maratha Chatrapati. However, he was able to secure a considerable level of autonomy for his region through a treaty between Sahu and Kanhoji. This was challenged after the death of Kanhoji which saw a period of turmoil over succession. 
In 1756, Tulaji Angre, the last of the Angre family was defeated by the British with the military cooperation of the Maratha Peshwa. Even though Tulaji was given a chance to surrender without any bloodshed, he chose to die honourably in the war rather than to live a life dishonourably.
‘The Rise and Fall of a Brown Water Navy’ refers to numerous primary and secondary sources, thus making it a remarkable and reliable scholarly work. Apart from scholars, the history of the Maratha Navy and Angre family is an enlightening reading for a layman interested in colonialism and naval history of India. However, a common reader may find it difficult to comprehend the technical terms related to the navy and military as well as the socio-political situation in the country.
The writers seem to have presumed that the reader is already aware of their meaning and import. A reader not well versed in military and naval history might end up looking on the internet, surfing through the social, historical and geo-political background of 17th-18th CE of India as well as Europe. Being a noteworthy scholarly work as it already is, however, had the book been written in a more comprehensive manner, it would have become more productive for the common readers.
In the Angre family we find national pride worth remembering but unfortunately most of the population, apart from the Marathas, is unaware of this personality who has left an indelible mark on India’s past. Hopefully, this remarkable book by Deshpande and Mujawar can help the Angre family earn the same respect on the pages of Indian History as given to the sepoys of the 1857 revolt.
---
*Critic and a story writer who majorly concerns herself with literature and socio-political issues. She has published in online journals, magazines and newspapers like Frontier, Kashmir Times, Mainstream Weekly, Kitaab, among others. She is currently engaged in writing about women's discourse and societal hierarchies

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.