Skip to main content

75% Indian businesses 'don't publish' tax transparency report, but seek subsidy: PwC

By Rajiv Shah 
Well-known international consultants, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), in a survey of India’s top business executives of big firms has regretted that as many as 75% of the respondents said their company does not have “a publishable tax transparency report (TTR)”, indicating “a gap in tax transparency-related practices.”
Further regretting that only 23% of companies use Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or other international standardised tax transparency related practices, the report, a copy of which has been forwarded to Counterview, thinks, “The survey shows there is room for improvement in tax transparency-related practices, as a significant number of companies are not utilising standardised frameworks for tax disclosure.”
The report, titled “Tax transparency in ESG: Insights into Indian businesses and their sustainable practices based on a PwC India survey”, says, “This finding highlights a lack of clear communication and transparency regarding tax practices, which can impact stakeholder trust and reputation.”
ESG stands for environmental, social and governance considerations, which, according to PwC “are not just about ‘doing good’, but are fundamental to any business in building reputation, reducing risks, and creating sustainable value for stakeholders.”
The report was released one day before Prime Minister Narendra Modi-promoted Vibrant Gujarat Global Investors' Summit, a biennial event for wooing national and international tycoons to heavily invest in his home state.    
Based on insights shared by 250 senior executives across a variety of industries in India, 75% of the survey participants are from companies with more than 500 employees; 37% are from companies comprising 1,000 to 5,000 employees; 66% belong to listed entities in India; and 34% are from unlisted entities, including privately held businesses.
The report also rues, “TTR is currently a voluntary disclosure in India”, insisting, there is need to for a “policy push” in this regard, because “a TTR is a specially made document to communicate an organisation’s societal contribution by way of taxes, its commitment to responsible tax behaviour and a narrative on tax matters of importance to stakeholders.”
The report reveals, the TTR document is not being prepared by majority of companies despite the “47% of respondents say that tax transparency disclosures could improve a company’s reputation by portraying it as engaging in responsible tax behaviour”.
Further, “44% of respondents opine that tax transparency can increase a company’s ESG profile, score and credibility” and “34% of respondents believe that tax transparency is an opportunity to shape a positive narrative for a company.”
Internationally, the report states, tax transparency is fast becoming a norm. Thus, it says, “In recent years, various organisations, including the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and the World Economic Forum (WEF), have emphasised the pivotal role of taxes within the broader framework of ESG.”
Pointing out that this has led to “Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)” for ensuring tax transparency, the report notes, “The OECD, through its BEPS initiative, calls upon companies to report their country-by-country tax information privately to tax authorities.”
It adds, “The International Business Council of the World Economic Forum (WEFIBC) has published a set of key metrics, which include reporting of taxes paid as a ‘core metric’ and the taxes collected and paid as a ‘recommended metric’ for stakeholders/ESG considerations.”
The report believes, this not only “highlights the growing importance of tax transparency in the context of ESG” but helps usher in “the Principle for Responsible Investment (PRI)”, which “encourages investors to advocate for fairer public policy on tax and integrate tax issues into their voting policies, strengthening the alignment between responsible investment practices and tax-related disclosures.”
Only 23% of Indian companies use Global Reporting Initiative or other international standardised tax transparency related practices
Also, the report says, “The European Union (EU) public country-by-country reporting directive and the EU corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) aim to promote transparency and accountability within businesses operating in the EU.”
“CSRD incorporates the use of GRI, which facilitates the reporting of tax-related information, further enhancing the comprehensive disclosure of financial and sustainability-related data. These rules are intended to ensure companies are held accountable to higher standards of disclosure and contribute to the EU’s larger objectives of sustainability and corporate responsibility.”
The Indian companies, suggests the report, comes nowhere near such international standards, with only 23% of companies adopted the GRI standard, underlining, “There’s a clear need then for more widespread alignment with international reporting frameworks/ standards to enhance stakeholder trust.”
About 75% Indian companies are reluctant for TTR, believes the report, despite the fact that majority of “three primary stakeholders in India” seek transparency: shareholders (76%), regulators (71%) and employees (50%). That 76% shareholders seek TTR suggests how keen they are about evaluating “long-term financial viability and risk associated with” their investment.
Refusal to be transparent about taxes stands in sharp contrast with the executives’ declared intentions. Thus, the report states, “50% respondents who have made a net-zero commitment”, of these “48% aim to achieve their goals by 2030, and are therefore poised to undertake decarbonisation measures at an accelerated pace”.
In fact, the report finds, “93% of respondents state that tax incentives – such as financial benefits and lowering economic barriers – can significantly promote adoption of ESG practices by businesses. Such benefits can incentivise businesses to adopt environment-friendly practices and promote investments in renewable technologies.”
They think that only through “incentives and policy interventions, governments can support businesses in achieving their decarbonisation commitments, addressing income inequality, and promoting diversity and inclusion...”

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".