Skip to main content

India should follow European Union, ban 'disrupting' endocrine pesticides: PAN India

Counterview Desk 

The environmental advocacy group Pesticide Action Network (PAN) India, even as welcoming the European Union decision to ban six endocrine disrupting pesticides, has noted “significant concern regarding the contamination of these hazardous pesticides in food items has in India”. In a statement, it said, “Government of India should review the registration of these specific hazardous chemicals ... to protect children, farmers and the environment.”
It regretted, while the European Union ban will be effective only a year later, “India should assess if these banned chemicals are imported into India. In the ongoing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) talks with UK and EU, India should insist on restricting products with residues of these chemicals.”


In a significant decision, European Union (EU) banned six Endocrine Disrupting Pesticides, based on the recommendation by the EU Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF). Amidst the tussle over continued usage of toxic agrochemicals in Europe, between various groups and pesticide business lobbies, this decision becomes critical, for different reasons. 
Pesticide Action Network (PAN) India welcomes this relevant intervention, considering the potential danger from these chemicals to unborn and young children even in very low concentrations. This ban comes 5 years after the (criteria) went into force and 10 years after the introduction of the regulation. This ban came at the right time.
This proposal to ban 5 chemicals was discussed by Member States during the SCoPAFF meeting on the 11 and 12th of July 2023. Before in 2009, it was agreed to identify and ban these highly dangerous and harmful substances. Having been in use for more than 14 years after such identification, these Endocrine Disruptors have entered our food and environment in significantly detectable levels. This has put the health and development of young children at unnecessary risk.
Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that mimic or block the action of hormones. They are known as EDCs, endocrine disrupting chemicals. They can be extremely dangerous for the unborn or young children. These chemical hormones can have devastating effects on the development of children in extremely low doses, comparable to natural hormones.
They can also cause cancer or brain damage at all ages. Pesticide residues in food is the main source of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals for humans. These chemicals alter the function of human hormonal system and can have adverse effects at a very low dose, particularly when exposure takes place during early life. Young children and pregnant women are especially vulnerable and are at higher risk. Many pesticides have endocrine disrupting properties, but until recently these properties were hardly investigated. And such chemicals were not properly regulated.
Initially, European Commission banned only one substance, a herbicide called Triflusulfuron-methyl, during the meeting with EU Member States in the SCOPAFF committee on pesticide legislation. This initial proposal by the Commission is now followed by four others of Endocrine Disruptors in the light of the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) findings.
These four active substances are: one herbicide, asulam sodium, two fungicides benthiavalicarb and metiram and one insecticide, clofentezine. They have all been found by EFSA to be endocrine disruptors to humans in its assessment between 2021 and 2023. While asulam sodium has never been approved in the EU, 4 other substances are authorised in pesticide products used in almost all Member States. The hormone disrupting substance, asulam sodium, was not approved, and the approvals of metiram, benthiavalicarb, clofentezine and triflusulfuron-methyl will not be renewed.
The approval of metiram was due to expire in 2016, that of benthiavalicarb and clofentezine in 2018 and that of triflusulfuron-methyl in 2019. Likewise, the EDC Free Europe coalition which represents more than 70 environmental, health, women's and consumer groups across Europe who share a common concern about EDCs and their impact on our health and wildlife, has openly expressed support for these ban proposals to swiftly enter into force.
Two of the 6 pesticides which are banned by the EU are registered in India. Metalochlor, a herbicide used to control 7 herbs in the soybean field is registered for use in India.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has declared it as a possible human carcinogen. Metiram another one among the banned pesticides is also registered in India, however Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine & Storage (PPQS) statistics doesn’t show its production or import. Metiram is a registered fungicide to treat fungal disease in 5 crops (tomato, groundnut, potato, grapes and rice). It causes various acute health problems like skin sensitivity and photo toxicity. It is detected as a Probable human Carcinogen and Possible thyroid toxicant by US EPA.

Stages of implementation

In 2013 the EU Commission bypassed the result of the work of endocrinologists and certain Member State experts who prepared a proposal to identify Endocrine Disrupting Pesticides (EDPs) and provide sufficient protection for population and environment. Then in 2016, the Commission proposed to completely change the rules and return to traditional risk assessment (instead of a hazard-based one).
Many pesticides have endocrine disrupting properties, but until recently these properties were hardly investigated
In 2018, after 5 years of delay, the Commission finally published a set of scientific criteria to identify EDCs together with a guidance document by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)/European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Once the scientific criteria entered into force, the authorities 'suddenly' realised that for many pesticides there were no tests provided to assess endocrine disruption.
They "stopped the clock" of the assessment to request additional data from applicants. This led to delays in the identification and banning of EDPs. Now finally, 5 years after the criteria entered into force and 10 years after the official request to provide such scientific criteria in 2013, EFSA has identified the first set of endocrine disrupting pesticides. The next stage started in May 2023.
Despite the ban, concerns have been raised about the grace period. The grace periods allow the ban to become effective on November 2024 for s-metolachlor and benthiavalicarb, and in January 2024 for metirm. This contradicts the regulation that demands the swift removal from the market of substances when they are banned for health or environmental reasons.
There is also significant concern regarding the contamination of these hazardous pesticides in food items in India, amongst others. Even though it is obvious that there are pesticide residues in food, data regarding weedicide residues in them is generally not available. Therefore, identifying the degree of contamination is made difficult by the lack of proper residue monitoring in food items, especially for weedicides.
“This needs to be taken seriously and in the light of EU ban. Government of India should review the registration of these specific hazardous chemicals and also other EDCs to protect children, farmers and the environment”, said A. D. Dileep Kumar, CEO of PAN India.
Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi, Adviser, Maharashtra Association of Pesticide Poisoned Persons and a public policy expert, comments, “This ban should have been immediate and not staggered over months. India should assess if these banned chemicals are imported into India. In the ongoing FTA talks with UK and EU, India should insist on restricting products with residues of these chemicals. Further, we hope EU will similarly ban glyphosate, which is the most pernicious toxic chemical.”



Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Palm oil industry 'deceptively using' geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.