Skip to main content

Cows on Ahmedabad roads? Reason: Amul, other dairies 'neglected' city cattle rearers

By Rajiv Shah 

A new study has blamed Gujarat’s powerful milk cooperative sector, known across the country as Amul, for failing to take into cognisance the need to place under its wings urban area pastoralists, popularly known as Rabaris, involved mainly in selling cow milk to individual consumers. The study insists, that this, coupled with the lack of any policy on the part of the Gujarat government to “rehabilitate and modernise” the Rabaris’ business, has pushed the pastoralists to the margins of urban society.
Carried out by Dr Vidyut Joshi, professor emeritus, Gujarat Vidyapeeth, with the help of several pastoralist leaders and experts, and called “Raste Razhadti Gayo: Samasya ane Ukel” (Stray Cattle on Road: Problems and Solutions), the study in Gujarati encompasses as many as 20 areas of western Ahmedabad, which were previously common grazing grounds, but were acquired in the name of urban development over last few decades. In all, there were 104 common grazing grounds across the city – all of them have disappeared.
Published by the Gujarat Vidyapeeth, a university founded by Mahatma Gandhi, and meant to be a supporting manual for those fighting a case in the Gujarat High Court for the rehabilitation and modernization of the Rabaris, the study underlines, while cooperative dairies of Gujarat are “considered the best and are famous across the world”, the fact is, “These cattle rearers have not been made their members. Hence they and their cows are deprived of the benefits of a cooperative society.”
The study says, “The cooperative dairy that Amul set up in India and started the White Revolution had mostly cattle farmers as its members.” Pointing out that “for these farmers cattle rearing was a supplementary business”, it regrets, however, “The herdsmen whose primary occupation was animal husbandry remained completely aloof from this dairy revolution” – something that remains unchanged to this day.
Claiming that there is a social-cultural factor behind this, the study underlines, “There was a time that these herdsmen were considered outside the village. Because of this, they were in a lower position in the caste system. Hence, while certain agricultural castes managed to dominate the milk societies, the people of cattle rearing castes were not made its members.” Hence, “these herdsmen could never enter the dairy industry.”
The book
Asserting that this legacy continues even now, especially in the state’s urban areas, the study insists, if these cattle rearers are placed under the guardianship of a big co-operative dairy, it would help them come out of the margins to which they have been pushed, thanks to be urban development model adopted over the decades in Gujarat, as elsewhere.
Of the 20 villages for that are now part of urban Ahmedabad (Ambali , Bopal, Chandkheda, Chandlodia, Chharodi, Ghatlodia, Ghuma, Hebatpur, Kali, Makarba, Memnagar, Mitakhali, Motera, Paldi, Ranip, Sarangpur, Sarkhej, Sola, Tragad and Vejalpur), and for which the study has been carried, Dr Joshi focuses on Vejalpur, where he lives, stating, to its herdsmen, urbanization “did not occur”, even though their pastures, a state property, were taken away.
Notes Dr Joshi, urbanization led to the destruction of their occupancy rights and no compensation were given – which is quite unlike the rehabilitation and settlement of Narmada dam oustees. Worse, while their pastures were taken away, they were not aware of their rights. In fact, “No one represented the government when their grazing land was taken for urban development. Even their organizations were also not active on this. The land of these pastures was taken very quietly.”
Dr Joshi told Counterview that  Ahmedabad's 104 village pastures, which were government land, were taken away despite a Supreme Court ruling which prohibits any move to acquire or sell common village land to a private person. "In case such land is taken away under any circumstance, the ruling insists, it should be fully compensated at the rate of 2x6 metres land per cow," he underlined.
On questioning a Vejalpur herdsman whether they “should go for modern dairy business and make value added milk products”, as many of 15 of them told Dr Joshi, they did not know how to do it, but expressed their readiness “if you help us.” The situation today is that, “their cows have become weak due to lack of proper diet and maintenance. The supply of milk has decreased.” While a few old customers continue to buy milk from them, the new ones “do not.”
Worse, points out Dr Joshi, with Amul and other dairies modern milk business traders coming to the city, “these herdsmen are left with nothing to do other than filling traditional milk queues. He insists, “If they want to survive, they have to modernize. The enclosures have to be made big and modern, so that the cows become competitive. Modern methods of milk business should be adopted. Otherwise, they will be pushed into the abyss of time.”
Giving details of the changes he witnessed in Vejalpur between 1964 and 2022, Dr Joshi says, in 1960s, there was a Rabarivas in Vejalpur, where 40 rabaris and two shepherds lived. All were engaged in animal husbandry. There was a pasture on a hillock nearby. A huge plain area supplemented this hillock where these cattle could graze freely. Then there was an area within the limits of the Vejalpur village panchayat.
Things started changing after 1975. Ahmedabad city started expanding and many villages in the western area, including the hillock, were merged into urban areas. Thereafter, herdsmen would go to graze their cattle on the empty lands around the nearby area of Sarkhej, which too was urbanised as time passed.
Today, 27 families out of the original 42 are still engaged in animal husbandry. However, there is no area nearby where the cattle could graze. During the day time the cattle would move to open space and also reach and sit on the roads. And, the herdsmen must buy grass to feed their animals. What is true for Vejalpur is equally true for other 19 villages.
Today, according to Dr Joshi, the situation is such that due to fleas and mosquitoes during monsoon, cows do not wish to remain in small dirty mangers and enclosures meant for them. Having sensitive skin, they, in search of drier climate, finding no free space, sit on the roads. Other reasons why cows are seen on the roads include people performing religious rites to pray cows; feeding them with food leftovers and grass sold on roadsides; hotels throwing surplus food on the roads which is eaten by cows; and lack of proper disposal of old and decrepit cows and old bulls.
The socio-economic profile of the pastoralists suggests that of the 518 in the 20 areas, families of a whopping 79% have two men (mostly father and son) in one household. This negates the notion that they live in joint families. Compared to earlier old village houses, they live in very small houses, with no vacant space left to build an extra room. Even two married brothers are not comfortable in living together in one house.
In fact, 186 respondents live in one room and 276 respondents live in two houses. “That means 89.18 people live in small houses. There are only four people who have a four room houses. Each has a separate kitchen, separate bathroom and separate living room”, says Dr Joshi.
Then, as many as 231 herdsmen out of 518 are school dropouts -- either they did not go to school or got dropped out midway without completing primary school. A few of them cannot even read and write, though know account, mostly orally. Answering why they could not complete primary school, they said, when young, they would be sent for cows grazing, hence became dropouts. However, today, no herders want their children to join their profession.
Further, the study shows that 451 or 87% respondents do not have any secondary occupation. While 11 people said that they do casual labour. two work as drivers, three people work as peons, and 18 people do private jobs. Further, 15 said they work as security guards, while 10 said they work as watchmen. One person said he pulled rickshaw.
A full time occupation, with no helper, their day starts at 4 in the morning, after which they milk cow, take milk to individual customers, and go to feed cows, for which often they have to go a few kilometres, for instance, in order to cross the Sarkhej Gandhinagar Highway and reach up to the Sardar Patel Ring Road, the outer ring road. Returning in the afternoon, they give away milk left unsold for preparing curd or ghee. They find no time spare for doing secondary business.
Negating the impression that these herdsmen are very rich, Dr Joshi says, while 10% of them have left animal husbandry for other jobs or are traders, “they are not definitely capitalists.” In fact, their “capital” – cows – is passive. Each cow gives on an average eight litres of milk per day. The cost of 8 litres milk, at Rs 40 per litre, comes to Rs 320 per day. On an average, says the study, “The monthly income from one cow's milk is Rs 9,600, of which only a third is the net income after deducting maintenance – around Rs 3,000 per month.
While the average number of cows is 10 per herdsman, only five of them give milk. Thus, out of 518 respondents 77 respondents said, their monthly family income is Rs 10,000 or less, and the rest have their income ranging from Rs 10,000 to Rs 25,000.
The survey also shows that 482 respondents’ families have gas connection, while 56 families cook on the hearth. A total of 305 (59%) respondents also have a fridge, needed to store curdled milk and curd. Those not having a fridge use the facility of their neighbours. As many as 454 (88%) respondents have motorcycles – a necessity for transporting milk and “pushing” cows and buffaloes to far away places for grazing.
According to Dr Joshi, the cows of a modern dairy eat especially prepared nutritious fodder, but the cows of these ranchers eat ordinary grass and what people, including hotels, offer to them on the city streets. This probably is the reason why cows give much less milk than the dairy cows.
“If we want to make cattle farmers modern and nutritious, they should have 25 cows on an average, should eat nutritious fodder, 12-13 out of 25 should give milk, with an average of 12 to 15 litres each per day”, he underlines. For this, they should own better breeds as Gir, Kankrej, Sahiwal, Rathi, Tharparkar and Lal Sindhi, all of which which give better quality and more milk.

Comments

Nandini Oza said…
Pasture lands of Narmada dam oustees were also never compensated by the state in cash or kind, leading to drastic loss of cattle heads of Narmada oustees. In this respect, Vidyut Joshi's study of @gujvidyapith is flawed in compaing the urban cattle owners with Narmada oustees and their occupancy rights of pasture lands.
Ashwin Desai said…
👍🏻...but we human are responsible for this menace, we city dwellers daily want milk to drink and we dont want cattle in the cities, these cattle rears feed cattle till the time they give milk then left them to street on their fate. We human always ready to exploit entire Ecosystem inclusing cattles and then want things according to our wish....
Every year few people killed because of cattles on streets, so its big threat and it should be removed from the streets. and we all are agreed upon it. so do we human agree to remove vehicles from roads, which killed thousands of people on road every year.
What is government stand on vanishing grazing land?
So ultimately poor/mother cows are responsible bcoz they can't speak..🙂
Municipal Corporation through Local Police in Ahmedabad charge the owners/caretakers around 2000-5000 for cattle freely roaming on the streets. We consider the city to be for humans that too those who come from outside not for those who lived on the land for centuries. Simple example of negligence and arrogance by city developers/designers are, lack (encroachment) of pasture lands and access to lakes/ponds in the process of development (vikaas-ass).
A well-researched article. For amelioration, no better way than raising the value of cattle products viz. dung and urine for soil health (through Natural and Ecological Farming) and for human health (through Panchgavya and household-utility-items).
Believe it or not, here in Borivali (north-west Mumbai), there is a young man who takes his cattle for grazing to some place and he has to walk on the road alongside the cattle. He goes early morning when the traffic is thin and returns in the evening when the traffic is heavy. This in a so-called modern city!!!!

TRENDING

The Vaccine War fails to reveal: Jabs not one of Indian scientists' 'proud' achievements

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 28 Sep 2023, the movie “The Vaccine War” by Vivek Agnihotri was released internationally, as the story behind India’s Covid-19 vaccine development. While there will be many a review written, as for other movies, a technical review is important, as the film is supposed to be fact-based, on the science and scientists behind the science.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Govt of India argument 'unscientific, it lied in SC': GM mustard environmental release

Counterview Desk  The advocacy group Coalition for a GM-Free India has urged the Supreme Court of India to pass orders to implement the unanimous recommendations of the five independent experts of the Court’s Technical Expert Committee, including the Government  of India’s experts. 

Busy in political event, Gujarat govt 'evaded' plans to reduce massive Narmada floods

Counterview Desk  Farmer rights group Khedut Ekta Manch Gujarat in a letter to Bhupendrabhai Patel, chief minister, with copies sent to the officials concerned, has asked the Gujarat government to form an independent committee to investigate the recent massive flooding in Narmada, even as seeking proper compensation to those affected by the disaster, many of whom are farmers.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.