Skip to main content

'Fundamental data flaws' in study exonerating role of Covid-19 vaccine in cardiac arrests

By Bhaskaran Raman* 

A study from GB Pant hospital in Delhi was recently published in the PLOS ONE journal. Based on a cohort of 1,578 patients, the authors conclude that the Covid-19 vaccines used in India reduced mortality. While the publication itself is careful in its wording of the conditions under which this reduction in mortality was seen, the press coverage was quick to headline that Covid vaccination does not increase risk of heart attacks.
While experts who understand the clinical aspects of the study can comment on those, this writeup examines the statistics behind the cited study and points out three main flaws. With suitable analogies, we seek to make it understandable to the layperson.
We shall use the following scenario to construct the analogies. Suppose that a new energy drink product has been introduced, designed to say help the customers complete a 5-km running race. However, in some people, the energy drink could potentially cause sudden hiccups, making the person abandon the race.
The parallels are obvious: a new vaccine has been introduced to help people complete their life, but in some people, the vaccine could cause sudden adverse events, resulting in cardiac arrest and possibly death.

First flaw: extremely unhealthy/at-risk cohort

The first statistical flaw in the study is that the cohort chosen in the study is extremely unhealthy. 201 out of 1578 participants, i.e. more than 1-in-8 participants, died within 30 days! This is an absurdly high death rate, indicating an extremely unhealthy/at-risk cohort. Therefore the study results are most certainly not applicable for the general population.
In terms of our analogy, suppose the study on 5-km race completion was done only on overweight people above 100-kg in weight, it clearly does not apply to the general population. This is depicted in the diagram below.

Second flaw: survivor bias

The second major statistical flaw in the study is the survivor bias. The cohort only consists of those who survived long enough to enroll in the hospital registry (NORIN-STEMI). It specifically excludes those who died suddently, while dancing, singing, gymming, working, walking, etc. This excluded group never even had a chance to reach the hospital.
In our analogy, suppose 100 people consume the energy drink one hour before the start of the race. Suppose 50 of them develop hiccups within 5 minutes, and hence do not even start the race. And of the 50 who start the race, 10 did not complete. And say in a group of 100 people who do not consume the drink, 40 did not complete the race.
If one looks at the statistics with the survivor bias, 10/50 (20%) did not complete among those who consumed the drink, while 40/100 (40%) did not complete among those who did not consume. This appears as a two-fold benefit. However, on removing the survivor bias, we find that 60% of those took the drink did not complete the race, which is 1.5 times worse than the control group which did not consume the drink. This is depicted in the figure below.

Third flaw: healthy vaccinee bias

The third major flaw in the study is the possibility that the vaccinated cohort is healthier than the unvaccinated cohort. Indeed, the authors do acknowledge this, but phrase this as “healthy user effect” and attribute it to healthy behaviours. This behaviour-related claim has no evidence and perpetrates the mainstream propaganda that somehow vaccinated people are more responsible in life.
What is much more likely instead is that the vaccine was not given at all, to the extremely unhealthy with various medical contraindications. Indeed, official websites give some such possible contraindications. The authors should examine this concrete possibility from their data, rather than conjecture personal behaviour as a reason.
The healthy vaccine bias can be illustrated in our analogy as follows. Suppose the energy drink is contraindicated for people above 150-kg in weight. Suppose that in a set of 100 people, 50 are above 150-kg and 50 are below. So only 50 are given the energy drink, of which say 10 did not complete the race. In the control group of 100 people, say 5 out of 50 under-150-kg did not complete, and 35 out of 50 above-150-kg did not complete the race.
With the healthy-participant bias, the statistics would work out to: 10/50 (20%) did not complete among the energy drink users, while 40/100 (40%) did not complete among the control group. Therefore the drink appears to have a two-fold benefit. However, if you compare only the under-150-kg group, the energy drink users had a two-fold harm in terms of race completion rate (10/50=20% versus 5/50=10%). This is depicted in the diagram below.
Note that the study reports an almost two-fold reduction in all-cause mortality in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated. This points to a strong healthy-vaccinee bias, as the Covid-19 vaccines were designed to reduce Covid-19 deaths, not all-cause deaths. Even the vaccine manufacturers have not claimed benefit of the vaccine in terms of all-cause death reduction!

Possible analysis with data

Given the above flaws, what is the way forward? A possible data analysis which can be done with data similar to that in the published study is the following. We could look at the time-since-last-Covid-vaccination for all heart attack cases who came to the hospital. 
One could look for a temporal indication, although this cannot possibly find long-term causal relationship between the Covid-19 vaccines and cardiac issues. For detecting or ruling out long-term correlation, the only high quality study is a randomised controlled trial.
*Professor at IIT Bombay; views are personal. He has authored the book “Math Murder in Media Manufactured Madness”, presenting simple math to illustrate various absurdities related to the mainstream Covid-19 narrative; available at:



Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

The Vaccine War fails to reveal: Jabs not one of Indian scientists' 'proud' achievements

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 28 Sep 2023, the movie “The Vaccine War” by Vivek Agnihotri was released internationally, as the story behind India’s Covid-19 vaccine development. While there will be many a review written, as for other movies, a technical review is important, as the film is supposed to be fact-based, on the science and scientists behind the science.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Modi govt intimidating US citizens critical of abuses in India: NY Christian group to Biden

Counterview Desk  the New York Council of Churches for its release of an open letter calling on the Biden administration to “speak out forcefully” against rising Hindu extremist violence targeting Christians and other minorities in India. In the letter addressed to President Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and other major elected officials, the NY Council of Churches expressed "grave concern regarding escalating anti-Christian violence" throughout India, particularly in Manipur, where predominantly Christian Kuki-Zo tribals have faced hundreds of violent attacks on their villages, churches, and homes at the hands of predominantly Hindu Meitei mobs.

Green revolution "not sustainable", Bt cotton a failure in India: MS Swaminathan

MS Swaminathan Counterview Desk In a recent paper in the journal “Current Science”, distinguished scientist PC Kesaven and his colleague MS Swaminathan, widely regarded as the father of the Green Revolution, have argued that Bt insecticidal cotton, widely regarded as the continuation of the Green Revolution, has been a failure in India and has not provided livelihood security for mainly resource-poor, small and marginal farmers. Sharply taking on Green Revolution, the authors say, it has not been sustainable largely because of adverse environmental and social impacts, insisting on the need to move away from the simplistic output-yield paradigm that dominates much thinking. Seeking to address the concerns about local food security and sovereignty as well as on-farm and off-farm social and ecological issues associated with the Green Revolution, they argue in favour of what they call sustainable ‘Evergreen Revolution’, based on a ‘systems approach’ and ‘ecoagriculture’. Pointing ou

Link India's 'deteriorating' religious conditions with trade relations: US policymakers told

By Our Representative  In a significant move, Commissioners on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) have raised concerns about the “sophisticated, systematic persecution” of religious minorities by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a hearing on India in Washington DC.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.