Skip to main content

Modi wooing Pasmanda Muslims but refusing to accord SC status to Dalit Muslims

By Abhay Kumar 

Ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has tried to reach out to Pasmanda Muslims.
Perhaps for the first time, he has publicly spoken about their issues. Speaking at the booth-level workers’ meet in Bhopal on June 27, Modi rightly said that Pasmanda Muslims were educationally backward and their miser- able life was the result of their exclusion from the for- mal sectors of employment.
He went on to say that they did not receive benefits from the previous regimes, nor had their voices been heard.
He was correct to say they were denied equality and were exploited. However, his reference to Pasmanda Muslims, who are treated as “untouchables”, is the most significant part of his speech.
Pasmanda, a Persian term, refers to those who have “fallen behind”. Sim- ply put, Pasmanda Muslims are Backwards (Shudra) and Dalits (Ati-shudra), who embraced Islam centuries ago to free themselves from caste oppression.
But the change of religion did not liberate them. Till today, they continue to suffer from caste discrimination and material deprivation.
They are even victims of segregation and untouchability. It is ironic that Is- lam, as a textual religion, underscores equality and brotherhood, but the social structure of the Muslim community is far from being egalitarian.
In his speech, Modi unambiguously accepted that Pasmanda Muslims were victims of untouchability. As he put it, “Those who are Pasmanda Muslims have not been given equality so far; they are treated as inferior (neecha) and considered untouchable (achhut)”.
Note that Modi’s acceptance of untouchability has contradicted the denial mode of the Hindu Right as well as his own Government’s position in the Supreme Court that Islam and Christianity do not have oppressive systems of caste and untouchability.
For example, the Modi Government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court in November 2022 and denied the existence of untouchability in Islam and Christianity.
The affidavit was filed in response to a petition in the Supreme Court that demanded Scheduled Castes (SC) status for Dalits who had converted to Islam and Christianity.
The petitioners argued that the exclusion of Dalit Muslims and Dalit Chris- tians from the SC category was discriminatory and it violated Fundamental Rights.
However, the Modi Government told the Supreme Court that SC status for Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians could not be accepted on the ground that “religions like Islam and Christianity did not have “the oppressive system of untouchability”.
By accepting the ground reality that Pasmanda Muslims face untouchability, Prime Minister Modi has now supported the argument in favour of the extension of the SC status to them.
According to the existing rules, SC reservations are extended to followers of Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism.
The Dalits, who have embraced Islam and Christianity, have been so far kept out of the SC list, even though there has been a strong movement for their inclusion. Through a Presidential Order of 1950, Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians have been denied SC status with the argument that Islam and Christianity are egalitarian.
Remember that the SC reservations are given to those communities which show “extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of the traditional practice of untouchability”.
However, a large corpus of empirical evidence and field works are available to show the existence of caste and untouchability in Is- lam and Christianity. Even the social, educational, and economic conditions of the Hindu Dalits, who are on the SC list and Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians, who are kept out of the SC list, largely converge.
In 2008, Professor Satish Deshpande and Geetika Bapna prepared a status report titled “Dalits in the Muslim and Christian Com- munities” for the National Commission for Minorities, Government of India and made “a strong case for ac- cording to Scheduled Caste status to Dalit Muslims and Christians”.
While giving authentic data on the social, educational and economic backwardness of Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians, they wrote that “untouchability” proper is sometimes practised” against Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians.
Similarly, Justice Ranganath Misra Commission, which submitted its report to the Government of India, in 2007, recommended SC status to Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians.
However, the Modi Government did not accept it and went on to tell the Supreme Court that the Misra could not be relied upon as it lacked empirical data.
Instead, the Modi Government constituted a new com- mission in 2022 to examine if Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians could be included in the SC list.
Three member commission is headed by former Chief Justice of India K. G. Balakrishnan.
Appearing before the Supreme Court, the Modi Government cited the newly formed commission and re- quested the Supreme Court to wait till the new commission submits its report.
However, the critics argue that the rejection of the Misra Commission report and setting up a new commission is politically motivated.
It is high time Modi accepted the bigger truth. Who would deny that Pasmanda Muslims have been the worst victims of systemic discrimination at the hands of the majoritarian state? During the communal riots, they have been the most vulnerable sections. Even those Pasmanda Muslims, who have been BJP workers, have not been spared during the communal mobilization as seen recently in Uttarakhand.
Should Modi not ensure security for them? Even Modi’s nine-year rule has failed to give relief to Pasmanda Muslims.
The rolling back of social welfare schemes, including the Maulana Azad scholarship for minorities and massive privatization, have negatively affected Pasmanda Muslims. It is high time PM Modi ensured social jus- tice, going beyond paying lip service. (First published in News Trail)
---
Author is a Delhi based journalist. He has taught political science at the Non- Collegiate Women’s Education Board of Delhi University

Comments

TRENDING

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

Misleading ads 'manipulate, seduce, lure' to market unhealthy harmful food

By Our Representative  The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPI) in its new report “50 Shades of Food Advertising” has sought to expose how seductive, luring, manipulative or deceptive these advertisements can be. Consequences of such advertising are increased intake of unhealthy food products that is associated with obesity and diabetes, it says. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Failure of governance': India, China account for 54% pollution-related deaths globally

By Vikas Parsaram Meshram*   A recent report jointly prepared by UNICEF and the independent research organization Health Effects Institute has been released, and the statistics within it are alarming. It states that in 2021, air pollution caused the deaths of 2.1 million Indians, including 169,000 children who hadn't yet fully experienced life. These figures are indeed distressing and raise questions about why there hasn't been more serious effort in this direction, putting policymakers to shame. 

Over 3.8 billion animals at risk: India on crossroad in animal welfare practices

By Rupali Soni*  In a collaborative effort, the India Animal Fund and Dasra have unveiled their report , "Our Shared Future | Securing Animal Welfare, Human Wellbeing, and Sustainability in India." This landscape report provides a thorough overview of animal welfare and underscores its indispensable role within India's socio-economic and ecological frameworks. It also illustrates how animal welfare is intricately intertwined with public health, labor welfare, and climate resilience.

August 9 to be observed as Corporates Quit India day: Top farmers' group

By Our Representative A recent general body meeting of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), the top farmers' organisation, stated hat "there is no need for any illusion of change in the pro-corporate policies of the BJP-NDA government" following the recent elections in which BJP failed to achieve even simple majority. It insisted,  Prime Minister Narendra Modi "is hell bent" to continue 'business as usual' policies.

Belgian report alleges MNC Etex responsible for asbestos pollution in Madhya Pradesh town Kymore: COP's Geneva meet

By Our Representative A comprehensive Belgian report has held MNC Etex , into construction business and one of the richest, responsible for asbestos pollution in Kymore, an industrial town in in Katni district of Madhya Pradesh. The report provides evidence from the ground on how Kymore’s dust even today is “annoying… it creeps into your clothes, you have to cough it”, saying “It can be deadly.”

Maharashtra govt's proposed bill may be used against 'dissenting' journalists, writers, filmmakers, artists

Counterview Desk  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Maharashtra, strongly objecting to what it calls “repressive and unconstitutional” Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, has demanded the proposed law be scrapped in its entirety. In its Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill, PUCL noted,  the broad and non-descript label of ‘urban naxal’ has been used, which is actually a “common slur used for any citizen who expresses their opposition to state policy or is not aligned with right-wing majoritarian views."