Skip to main content

Adivasi communities 'don't want' uniform laws, seek identity protection: Top academic

By Dr Abhay Kumar* 
Professor Virginius Xaxa -- who headed the High-Level Committee set up by the Prime Minister’s Officer to probe into “the socio-economic, educational and health status of tribal communities” in 2014 -- has said that uniform laws have proved “detrimental” to the interests of the Adivasi community.
In an online interview with the author, Prof Xaxa said that the generalised [uniform] laws imposed from the top had negatively affected the Adivasi society, eroding their customary practices and taking away their resources. Instead of such laws, he supported the policy of respecting cultural diversity and ensuring the vulnerable groups their rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Elaborating on this issue, Prof Xaxa said the need of the hour was to protect the Adivasi identity and defend their interests. He argued the imposition of uniformity was not desirable.
Prof Xaxa, who taught sociology at several prestigious educational institutes before his retirement, said that the uniform laws were justified in the name of the larger public good, but they resulted in nullifying some of the protective provisions, which were given to the Adivasi community by the Constitution. “The generalized laws have been detrimental to the Adivasis”, he added.
Former deputy director of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (Guwahati), Prof Xaxa, therefore, opposed the imposition of uniformity. He expressed disappointment that the discourse on the uniform civil code was being carried out without seeking the informed consent of the people, particularly those who were the most vulnerable and disadvantaged.
Prof Xaxa, who worked extensively on the lives of Adivasis, criticized the Government of India for not placing the report of the 21st Law Commission of 2018 before the larger public. As a result, the citizens were not facilitated to have informed ideas about the subject.
He called it “unfortunate” that the discourse of the UCC was being held “in a vacuum.” without any preparation by the Government. He, therefore, expressed concern that such a policy might affect religious minorities negatively and adversely impact the Adivasi community as well.
---
*Independent journalist, has taught political science at the Non-Collegiate Women’s Education Board of Delhi University

Comments

TRENDING

Small Farm, big success: How an innovative couple built a model of sustainable farming

By Bharat Dogra  In Sema, a remote village in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district, Bhagwati Lal and his wife Rekha share equal credit for creating a remarkable farm that has become an inspiration for villagers and visitors alike. Their achievement demonstrates how even a very small piece of land can provide a strong foundation for sustainable livelihoods while enhancing climate resilience and protecting the environment.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline.