Skip to main content

Access to Modi-launched maternity benefit scheme 'declines alarmingly' by 40%

By Bharat Dogra* 

There is a clear urgency of action needed to check the decline in access of benefits of the most important national-level maternity benefit scheme. The government must take immediate steps for this, particularly in the context of states like Gujarat and West Bengal, where the sharp decline in 2021-22 has been particularly distressing.
According to the latest available data, maternity benefits which should be available for all child-births could reach only about one-third or so, and what is most shocking is that over a period of two years there was a decline of 40% in the total number of women receiving the benefits from the biggest maternity scheme of the union government.
In 2013 the National Food Security Act made available certain maternity benefits to Indian women, a step which was appreciated widely. Section 4 of this law stated that every pregnant and lactating mother shall be entitled to (nutritious food and)maternity benefit of not less than Rs 6,000 in such installments as may be prescribed by the Central government.
In order to meet this legal commitment clearly an additional budgetary amount was needed which should have been made available per year since then. On the basis of assuming a population of 132 crore then, a birth rate of 20 per thousand and an effective coverage of 90%, it was estimated that the annual budget needed for implementing this legal commitment is around Rs 14,000 crore.
Even after allowing the government adequate time for operationalizing this legal entitlement, from financial year 2015-16 onwards, this commitment and spending of Rs. 14,000 crore per year must have been available. Actually this should have increased with inflation, but even if we do not provide for this increase for the time being, then during the seven financial years 2015-16 to 2021-22, Rs. 98,000 crore should have been provided.
However, when we look at the actual expenditure on this, then what is needed for one year (Rs 14,000 crore ) was actually spent over a period of seven years. In other words Indian mothers were deprived of Rs 84,000 (Rs 98,000 - Rs 14000) crore during this period of 7 years in the context of their legal entitlement of maternity benefit.
The spending has been largely done after a scheme to implement this legal entitlement was launched in 2017. This is called the Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY).
Hence even after allowing for almost 2 years for preparing for implementation of this legal entitlement, during 2015-16 and 2016-17 there was negligible allocation. In 2017-18 there was allocation of Rs. 2700 crore but later the budget estimate was reduced. This reduction took place to an even greater extent in the next year. The cut was very heavy in 2020-21, from budget allocation of Rs 2,500 crore to just Rs 1,300 crore.
When the government formulated detailed guidelines for PMMVY in 2017, ignoring original legal provisions it decided to restrict the maternity benefits only to the first living child and even this was reduced to Rs 5,000 ( instead of the minimum provision of Rs. 6000 provided originally in the law), to be paid in three installments.
Further, the procedures for availing these benefits were made so complicated that it became difficult for many mothers to avail these benefits, particularly in the poorest and least educated sections where this benefit is needed the most. 
In addition, these benefits have sometimes been denied to women who gave birth at home (these may have been due to imposed circumstances or reasons beyond their control), or who did not have aadhaar card or other relevant documents.
To be eligible and to get each of the three installments, several long forms have to be filled. Documents required to be furnished by them include MCP Card (Mother-Child Protection Card), the aadhaar card of the mother and her husband, bank pass book, linking of bank account with aadhaar. 
Even minor discrepancies in documents can sometimes lead to denial of payment. The mother applying for maternity benefits depends on local functionaries like anganwadi workers and depending on how much time they can devote to a case where some complication exists, the application may not be successful.
Even after all the efforts have been made, online applications for these payments can be rejected or returned with error due to a number of factors, or even if application is accepted payment may not reach in time. Sometimes mistakes lead to payment being deposited in a wrong account. Then getting this mistake corrected is another challenge.
In Gujarat and West Bengal, the sharp decline in 2021-22 has been particularly distressing
Despite all these problems, at least some progress in covering the first child birth was made and by 2019-20 about 96 lakh (9.6 million) mothers received at least some PMMVY benefit. However in the next two years this declined to 75 lakh and 61 lakh respectively, a very big decline of 40% in 2 years. In 2019-20 in the case of 36% births the first installment under PMMVY was received.
By 2021-22 this declined to 23%. If to this we add the probability of nearly 10% of total births receiving maternity benefits in the organized sector under various provisions, this means that a total of about 33% births were covered in 2021-22 by maternity benefits , of which 23% were under PMMVY, testifying to the importance of this scheme despite its poor progress.
However, if are looking at the payment of all three installments, then in 2019-20 these were received in the case of 22% of births, a number which declined to just 13% in 2021-22, a shockingly low performance.
Information on this important scheme has not been readily available, a problem made more complicated by the merging and renaming of several related schemes. This latest information became available through the use of RTI law by Prof Jean Dreze and Prof Reetika Khera.
Clearly what has happened in the course of implementing the maternity benefit component of the national food security law has been very unjust and corrective measures need to be taken on the basis of urgency.
The arbitrary action of restricting the benefits to only the first living child should be dropped in favour of covering all births. If at all there is some urgent requirement to restrict, at least the first three living children should be covered. The arbitrary reduction from Rs 6,000 to Rs 5,000 should also be rolled back and the original payment of Rs 6000, revised upwards on the basis of inflation, should be provided.
Hence, an annual budget based on this upward revision should be ensured to meet this legal commitment which is also highly justified in view of its health benefits for mothers and children. In addition the provisions for availing this maternity should be simplified and several arbitrary requirements should be avoided.
---
*Honorary convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books iinclude'Planet in Peril', ‘Protecting Earth of Children’ and ‘Man over Machine'

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Attack on Gaza: Western media 'went out of the way' to obscure, protect perpetrators

By Sonali Kolhatkar*  Israeli forces killed more than a hundred Palestinians and wounded more than 700 on February 29, 2024 during a distribution of food aid in Gaza city, pushing the Palestinian death toll to 30,000 since October 7, 2023. The food aid massacre was straightforward in its deadliness as armed Israeli forces aimed weapons at desperate, hungry Palestinian civilians and killed many of them. It was also plausible within the context of who has firepower and who doesn’t, and wholly consistent with Israeli atrocities, especially those committed since October 7, 2023.

Living standards in 'model' Gujarat worse than major states: Govt of India document

By Rajiv Shah  Amidst raging controversy over whether the latest Government of India’s “Household Consumption Expenditure Survey 2022-23 Fact Sheet: August 2022-July 2023” suggests that India’s poverty levels are actually down to 4.5 to 5%  during the decade-long Narendra Modi rule, a state-wise breakup in the 27-page document shows that “model” Gujarat’s average consumption expenditure is far below most of the so-called developed states.

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Not livable in summer, Chitrakut PM-Awas houses 'push' tribals in moneylender trap

By Bharat Dogra*  Those who are in-charge of implementing the PM-Awas scheme of rural housing can rightly take pride in what has been achieved in Dafai hamlet (Karvi block, Chitrakut district, Uttar Pradesh). All the Kol tribal families here are extremely poor and vulnerable. In a rare achievement, almost all of them have received housing assistance under PM Awas. 

Stressing on standardisation, efficiency, capitalists 'intensify' workers' exploitation

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The productivist ideology lies at the core of the profit-making pyramid of capitalism. It perpetuates a relentless cycle characterized by busy schedules, workplace tension, an imbalance in work-life equilibrium, and a pervasive sense of alienation. 

Development? This tribal hamlet in Chitrakut has no toilets, no electricity connections yet

By Bharat Dogra*  As we moved away from the starting point of the Bundelkhand Expressway and a famous pilgrimage site into a side-road, the hills of Chitrakut here appeared to be more and more isolated. Another turn, and we appeared to have reached almost a dead-end. However it is here that over 80 households of the Kol tribal community have been living for a long time.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

WTO 'loses legitimacy': CSOs shut out of normal participation in MC13 at Abu Dhabi

By Deborah James  Given unprecedented repression of participants, the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) at Abu Dhabi should not continue until historical and international standards and human rights for participation in global governance are restored.