Skip to main content

Dawat-e-Iftar? Telengana minority budget funds ignore poorest of poor, underprivileged

By Dr Lubna Sarwath* 

In the court order dated 17.6.2017 in WP(PIL)143/2017 it is mentioned that 'Learned Additional Advocate General would also state that the expenditure for the dinner to be hosted by the State government in the LB Stadium would not be incurred from the funds earmarked in budget for Minority Welfare'.
In spite of such assurance incorporated in the High Court Order, the state government year after year allocated the state iftar from Minority Welfare funds.
In the two Public Interest Litigations WP(PIL)143/2017 and wp(pil) 142/2018, an appeal was made to the High Court at Hyderabad, that crores of public exchequer squandering of funds in the name of a religious affair, that too from 'Minority Welfare' budgeted funds, where neither minority nor welfare was the objective, be stopped.
Six years on the judiciary is yet to heed to our appeal.
In the order passed in 16.6.2017 in WP(PIL) 143/2017, the Chief Justice had ordered that as per the Government Order and as per the statement given by the Government in the Court, it has to be ensured that the food in Dawat-e-Iftar should go only to the 'poorest of poor', destitute women, orphans, widows, other poor, etc. Verification should be done by the government both while disbursing the food/clothes and also post-iftar by the government. The same to be submitted to the court.
But, it is observed in all the years from 2015 onwards till 2023 the recipients of the iftar were neither identified as per Order. They were neither 'poorest of poor' nor other categories mentioned above, as the attached pictures of and the story on the Dawat-e-Iftar of 2023, show.
In the name of secularism, corruption cannot be condoned. What goes on in the name of lavish iftars is not secularism, rather, it is nothing short of an urge to camouflage the injustice done to the very section of population in whose name funds are budgeted, but spent otherwise.
Apart from the splurge of food/fruits etc. there is no record of who gets the clothes pack, who got the tender to supply the clothes, why CM picture on pack when it is out of public funds? Who spent the Rs 1 lakh given to each of 815 masjid committees. What sort of a scheme is this and to fulfil what objective? From Minority Welfare budget funds with no welfare of Minority or any citizen absolutely.
It is expected that the High Court at Hyderabad takes cognizance of the contempt of its Order. The squander and corruption of funds should not just be stopped but the investigation and recovery of funds should be ordered.
At a time when employment recruitment is in a shambles, vacancies in numerous departments including critical are aplenty, housing and education for the more than 1,000 slums in Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) is a far cry, health and nutrition is not a concern, women security/empowerment is not top priority, Dawat-e-Iftar has become an occasion for timepass and keep masses sedated.
---
Petitioner in WP(PIL)143/2017 and WP(PIL)142/2018, joined by Talha Jabeen, Nikhat Fatima, Shameem Sultana, Amina Niloufer Hussain, Dr Jasveen Jairath, Sanghamitra Malik, and many other conscious citizens

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".