Skip to main content

Not difficult to visualise multiple disasters in Himalayas: 30 more hydel power project

By Shankar Sharma* 

Subsequent to the recent disaster and the ongoing crises for the communities in and around Joshimath due to the landslides, the focus seems to have been shifted to hydel power projects in the region and across the Himalayas. The associated concerns for civil society has multiplied in recent days due to the recent announcement by the Union government informing Lok Sabha that 30 large size hydel projects are being implemented in the vulnerable slopes/ valleys of the Himalayas.
Many opinion pieces in the national media also have started discussing the pros and cons of hydel power projects. Whereas most articles have been raising serious concerns over the continuing policy of the Union government to build more hydel projects in the Himalayas, there are many opinion pieces indicating blind support for hydel power projects without deliberating on social and environmental aspects.
It has come to be more or less accepted that hydel power projects are no longer deemed essential for the satisfactory operation of any power grid; in view of the modifications to operational regime, energy storage batteries, and technological changes.
When we objectively consider the true relevance of hydel power projects to our people/ country from a holistic welfare perspective, and if we also credibly compare the costs and benefits of a typical large/ medium size hydel power project with suitable alternatives for meeting the growing demand for electricity in the country, the associated issues should become pretty clear.
The associated social, environmental and economic costs to the country of a typical large/ medium size hydel power project can be observed as much higher than the meager benefits; anywhere in the country, including in Western Ghats and plains.
It can be stated without meaning any disrespect to any particular authority that it is hard to notice adequate level of responsibility, accountability and sensitivity to our national interests in the policies/ decisions to build huge cost/ impact hydel power projects even in highly ecologically sensitive areas such as the Himalayas, core areas of Western Ghats, including some locations within the legally protected wildlife sanctuaries, which are also global biodiversity hotspots.
In view of the fact that since 2010 onwards the global experience has been growing increasingly in favour of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power technologies, and the energy storage batteries, our country should take adequate care to undertake such comparative costs and benefits at every stage, and thereby massively reduce or completely eliminate the societal level risks/ costs from the associated landslides, floods, forced displacements, and other societal level costs.
In this larger context, the civil society groups should embark on a massive awareness campaign not only to educate the larger society on all the associated issues, but also to persuade the concerned authorities to become adequately responsible, diligent and sensitive to the peoples' views.
Few decision making tools such as 'costs and benefits analysis', 'options analysis' and 'SWOT analysis' should be effectively deployed to assist in the associated economic decision making process, and the past experience from the wider world should also be considered.
Can we hope that the leading national level media houses also exhibit the requisite level of media obligations in subjecting the opinion pieces, which may be sent to them in this regard, to rigorous examination by asking suitable questions, instead of blindly accepting the opinion pieces for publication; even when many of them can be seen as clearly favouring commercial benefits to a few corporate houses, but at an enormous cost to the entire country?

Combined madness

Be that as it may, there seems no end, in the foreseeable future, to the combined madness of our bureaucrats and politicians, who seem to be determined to push every possible geological/ hydrological risk in the Himalayas to the logical conclusion of landslides, floods and all the associated human catastrophe.
Unless the civil society takes active participation in all the associated decisions, and persuades the concerned authorities to be extremely cautious and rational, our future can be scary due to the threats of climate change alone.
Why are our top institutions seem to be hesitant/ reluctant to focus on societal level critical issues?
There are 87 hydroelectric power projects, with installed capacity of nearly 23,000 MW, that are currently operational in the Himalayan, and 30 more large projects to cope up. With such a scenario, is it difficult to visualise the multiple disasters which can be forecast in the Himalayas?
Someone in a larger email group has suggested: It would be a good idea to write about the non-viability of dams (may be jointly) like in the Himalayas.
Whereas many articles/ study reports on this topic have already been published in our national media since year 2000, and whereas a number of recommendations from credible agencies (including a few from the Union government) have unequivocally recommended to minimise/ eliminate most of the ongoing/ proposed project constructions in the Himalayas, our bureaucrats and politicians seem to be refusing to read the large writing on the wall on such disasters. Few discussion papers, as enclosed to the forwarded email below, can be seen as examples of such awareness efforts.
In this context, it is highly relevant to ask the question as to why the high profile and public funded institutions in the country have not deemed it necessary for them to raise the kind of valid questions, which civil society has been asking for a number of years.
It has always been an enigmatic issue to me that these institutions such as NIAS, IITs, IIMs, NITs, Central Universities, and dedicated bodies like Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (WIHG) at Dehradun etc., which are well equipped to understand/ appreciate/ analyse all the associated issues, have not been expressing concerns about such avoidable economic activities without compromising in any way, the overall developmental pursuit of our communities. I have come across a number of such reports/ articles of societal level importance only from IISc, Bengaluru.
It is a moot point as to why all these institutions seem to be hesitant/ reluctant to focus on many such societal level critical issues without being seen as writing against any government; either at the centre or at the states.
It should be entirely feasible for these bodies to consider such societal level concerns to make an objective assessment of the associated policies; apply 'costs and benefits analysis', 'options analysis', and 'risk analysis'; check for compliance of the relevant Acts/ rules; and then to make credible recommendations.
Even if the authorities refuse to accept these recommendations in total, civil society groups can make effective use of such recommendations to take them to the larger society, and to the court of law if necessary.
These bodies can also seek the assistance/ involvement of few domain experts in civil society and/or few organisations, which may have the necessary domain knowledge, if deemed necessary. But sadly most of these institutions seem to be content in operating in isolated mode, generally insulated from the difficulties/ concerns of the communities who fund them through their taxes.
The situation has been made worse by the total indifference of most of our lawmakers/ political parties, who seem to be interested only in political wrangles of no consequence to the larger population.
Until such time when our country sees a satisfactory level of transformation in the discharged responsibilities of such institutes, civil society groups have to take the necessary responsibilities to try and prevent/ minimise the associated miseries to the vulnerable sections of our society.
The minimum we can all do in this regard is to send suitable representations, in adequate numbers, to the concerned authorities in a coordinated manner, if feasible. At the barest minimum, credible representations to the concerned authorities on all important issues can be simply endorsed. But most of us in civil society seem to be reluctant to put even such simple efforts.
---
*Power and climate policy analyst

Comments

TRENDING

Reducing emission? India among top nations whose coal as energy source going up

By NS Venkataraman*  The State of the Global Climate report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirmed that the year 2023 was the warmest year on record, with the global temperature of 1.4 degree celsius above pre-industrial 1850-1900 base line.

Lockdown 'total failure' of science more than of politics: Open letter on 4th anniversary

Counterview Desk  In an open letter to fellow academicians, scientists and medical practitioners in India, marking the fourth anniversary of India's lockdown (25 March 2024), the Managing Committee* of the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) has insisted on the need to "repair two years of immense damage to science".

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Attack on foreign students: Gujarat varsity's reputation, ranking at stake, say academics

Counterview Desk  Expressing anguish over the attack on international students in Gujarat University hostels, a letter claimed to have been signed by 122 current and former academics has asked the Gujarat Vice Chancellor, Dr Neerja Gupta, to provide emotional support to the attacked students and to ensure their physical safety.  

As double engine takes backseat in Odisha, BJP is pitted against 'firmly rooted' BJD

By Sudhansu R Das  BJP has got 25 years to build its party base in Odisha. After 25 years, it felt helpless and insecure to fight elections on its own strength. The party was almost crazy to have an alliance with the ruling BJD in Odisha.  Looking for alliance at the time of election shows that the party has not groomed its grassroots level workers into potential leaders.  The state BJP leaders woke up and convinced the Central leaders that they are capable of going solo; the alliance was stillborn. The question is can BJP defeat BJD which is firmly rooted in Odisha after launching piles of populist programs in the state.