Skip to main content

Tax buoyancy claims when less than 4% Indian dollar millionaires pay income tax

By Prasanna Mohanty 

In FY18, the last year for which disaggregated income tax data is available, only 29,002 ITRs declared income above Rs 5 crore, while Credit Suisse said India had 7.25 lakh dollar millionaires (the wealth equivalent of Rs 8 crore and above) that year.
Often enough, the Centre claims that demonetization in 2016 raised tax collections, improved tax efficiency, and expanded the tax base. Now RBI Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) member Ashima Goyal has also joined their ranks, attributing the “claims” of rising tax collections in the current fiscal year to “tax buoyancy” brought by the demonetisation.
Do such claims have any basis in official records? The answer is unequivocal.
The budget documents show the tax-to-GDP ratio (direct plus indirect tax) increased from 10.6% in FY16 (pre-demonetization) to 11.2% in FY17, remained there in FY18 (demonetization and GST fiscals), and then fell to 9.9% in FY20. In FY22, it improved to 10.8% and is estimated to drop to 10.7% in FY23 -- both below the FY17 and FY18 levels.
Is the tax-to-GDP ratio for FY23 likely to improve over 10.7%?
Despite the claims of higher-than-expected direct tax and GST (indirect tax) collections in the past few months, this is unlikely to happen because the data provided by the Controller General of Accounts (CGA) up to October 2022 reveals that until October 2022 (from April 2022), the realised tax collection is 60.5% of the budget estimate -- significantly lower than 68% in the corresponding period of FY22.
What about income tax (direct tax)? This is key to explaining “tax buoyancy,” which the RBI official brought into the picture.
For taxation to be buoyant, the increase in tax collection should be greater than that of GDP. This is a common occurrence (having a tax buoyancy greater than 1). Shockingly, income tax data is available only up to FY19 (disaggregated data is available only up to FY18 or AY19). It shows that tax buoyancy was 0.8 in FY16 (pre-demonetization), increased to 1.1 in FY17 and 1.59 in FY18, and then fell to 1.21 in FY19.
In the absence of data for FY20, FY21, and FY22, no definite trend can be identified. However, a few things can be said about the data presented above.
Both the tax-to-GDP data and the tax buoyancy data show there is an improvement in FY17 and FY18 and then a fall. This can be easily explained: the government ran “Income Declaration Scheme” in 2016 and 2017, allowing people to disclose undeclared income; the demonetization brought cash at home to banks, revealing some undisclosed income and the need to file ITRs and the GST entailed hitherto informal enterprises to avail relief from the cascading effect of multiple indirect taxes by shifting to the GST and benefit from the “input tax credit” built into it.
The subsequent fall in FY19 could be partly explained by the “dropped filers” -- the ones who dropped out after having filed ITRs to declare their undeclared income in FY17 and FY18 -- and also by the economic slowdown that hit (the GDP growth slipped to 3.7% in FY20). Dropped filers are a well-known category of taxpayers in tax parlance, distinct from “non-filers,” who avoid paying taxes and do not file ITRs.
Thus, before making any definite claims of higher tax buoyancy, the income tax data for FY20, FY21, and FY22 should first be made public to know if the disruptions caused by the demonetization have stabilised into a pattern or not.
What about the expansion of the tax base -- another frivolous claim associated with the demonetization?
The income tax data reveals that the growth in the number of people filing ITRs was 12.8% in FY16 (before demonetization), fell to 7.3% in FY17, went up to 13.8% in FY18, and then fell to 13.7% in FY19.
One question that has bothered is: why is Govt of India reluctant to make income tax data public
But these numbers are meaningless without taking into account growth in population or employment. The tax data also shows an average of 2% of ITRs are filed disclosing “zero” income and paying “zero” tax. Then the fall in growth of ITRs in FY17 (as against the rise in the tax-to-GDP ratio and tax buoyancy numbers) needs explaining, which the ITD doesn’t do.
There are many more problems with the tax data.
Detailed or disaggregated tax data is available only up to the assessment year of 2018–19 (AY19), that is, until FY18 -- nearly five years too old. These data don’t even answer the most basic and simple questions: how many people actually pay income tax in a given year and what are their income levels?
All one gets to know is how many ITRs were filed and what income levels these ITRs revealed. The government surely has much more information, and this isn’t about “dropped filers” or “non-filers” -- both of which are tracked routinely too. Senior citizens over the age of 75 who do not need to file an ITR but pay tax (banks, for example, deduct tax on interest earnings) or many who have had their tax deducted at source (TDS).
So, what does the disaggregated annual tax data reveal that can be of any use? There are three takeaways:
  • During the four years of the Modi regime, from FY15 to FY18, 68.4% of ITRs on average declared their income up to Rs 5 lakh.
  • The rest, 31%, declared income above Rs 5 lakh.
  • Only 10% of those earning more than Rs 10 lakh declared their income.
The Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report of 2019 said India had 7.25 lakh millionaires in 2018. Its 2022 report says the number jumped to 7.96 lakh in 2021, making it fifth on the list of countries with high-income millionaires. Their number is set to more than double to 16.32 lakh in 2026.
One million dollars (USD) equals Rs 8 crore (Rs 80).
How many ITRs declared income of Rs 8 crore or more in FY18 -- the last available data?
Those declaring income above Rs 5 crore (in FY18) were 29,002 -- just 4% of the dollar millionaires that year!

Hiding IT details

One question that has bothered many is why the Indian government is reluctant to make income tax data public.
Here is a little background.
French economists Lucas Chancel and Thomas Piketty, who studied income inequality in India and are the only ones known to have used tax data for their study, disclosed in their 2017 book “Indian income inequality, 1922-2015: From British Raj to Billionaire Raj?” that India stopped publishing income tax data in 2000 and that “it was only in 2016 that the Income Tax Department released tax tabulations for recent years (2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14).” For the record, India first introduced the Income Tax Act in 1922 (during British time).
---
Source: Centre for Financial Accountability

Comments

TRENDING

Women innovators on simple, revolutionary alternate solutions for water problems

By Proshakha Maitra, Mansee Bal Bhargava* The detrimental effects of uncontrolled population rise and accelerated change in the global climate have posed tremendous pressure on the water and sanitation. This calls all stakeholders, from both developed and developing nations, to improve their resilience and to instigate sustainability. It is more crucial than ever to optimise the use of the resources we have on hand since the world population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Crusader for people’s causes, this Hollywood actor entered 'unexplored zones' in US

By Harsh Thakor*  Marlon Brando on April 3rd completes his birth centenary. He perished in 2004, on July 1, aged 80 years. Arguably in Hollywood Brando penetrated sensitivity and versatility at an unparalleled scale and discovered new horizons or explored path breaking zones in acting.

Nuclear power expansion: Is AEC's new, 'unrealistic' target fully backed by PMO?

By Shankar Sharma*  Another unrealistic and tall claim by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) has been announced: India is eyeing 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, the AEC chairman  AK Mohanty   has said. A few years ago, the dream target for the Indian nuclear establishment was 275,000 MWe of nuclear power by 2050 (as per DAE document of 2008 "A Strategy for the Growth of Electricity in India”). Now this target of 100 GW nuclear power by 2047. And as at the end of February 2024, the actual nuclear power capacity was only 7,480 MWe, which formed only 1.7% of the total power capacity in the country. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Indians witnessing 'regression to Hindutva politics' under Modi ahead of elections

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The forthcoming general election in India, scheduled from April 19, 2024, to June 1, 2024, to elect the 543 members of the 18th Lok Sabha and the new Government of India, carries immense significance for the preservation of India's identity as a liberal, secular, and constitutional democracy.