Skip to main content

India's decentralized vaccine procurement policy 'ignores' informal sector workers

By Bappaditya Mukhopadhyay* 

Preventing the third wave requires a judicious mix of vaccination and lockdown. Our current strategy regarding vaccination is far from what it should be. Let us begin with some numbers. As on May 25, 2021, we have administered close to 19.5 crore vaccines. However, this means only 3% of the population receiving the complete dose and around 11% receiving a single dose.
Compared to the other G20 countries, while India is not the least vaccinated country compared to the rest, given the percentage of people at mortality risk owing to Covid (cardio vascular diseases and diabetes) and the health infrastructure (number of beds per thousand), our vaccination numbers are far less than what we should have aimed. 
It is now clear from various studies that vaccination against Covid primarily reduces the hospitalization rate. Most studies estimate that the hospitalization rate will reduce by at least 80% on an average between those who have received the complete dosage versus those who have not received any vaccination at all.
Given that India has the highest number of high population density clusters as well as the least number of hospital beds per 1000 among the peers (0.53 against 2.4 from the nearest country, South Africa), prevention for us may soon have to be realistically replaced by no hospitalization. This simply means for us we have to place far more importance to vaccination than anyone else.
The current shortages in vaccination numbers are evident from the fact that as against the daily average of 29 lakh doses administered in April, the number fell to 19 lakh a day a month later in spite as people queued up all across the country for the jabs. The distribution of the new arrivals across first and second dose also presents a gloomy future. In the month of April, close to 80 million received the first dose.
In the best-case scenario where India produces 75-80 million vaccines per month July onwards, it will not be sufficient to even give the second doses “on time” forget any one getting their first doses. It does leave us with one uncomfortable choice -- either a significant population who all are equally vulnerable with a single vaccine or few in the population who are least vulnerable (having both doses) while a large portion of the population are left without a single dosage.
However, there are ways to avoid the dilemma and that doesn’t stop with procuring more vaccines alone. We need to look at our strategy to vaccinate. Unless vaccination starts from the lowest economic strata, we would struggle to keep hospitalization rates down. 
In best-case scenario if India produces 80 million vaccines per month July onwards, it won't be sufficient to give second doses on time
Therefore, the single most important mantra must be that vaccines are available for all at the same price-free! The current combination of judiciously mixing vaccination strategy to prevent hospitalization and lockdown to prevent the spread, will be largely ineffective unless those in the informal sector are not vaccinated.
While the government is trying to procure more vaccines and hopes higher availability by early July, will there be enough demand with the current proposed pricing and distribution? As it stands, often the cost for a single dose will be higher than the poverty line itself! Expecting economically stressed household to pay that is beyond any rational belief.
As a result, two things will happen: The rich, who can afford, will get vaccinated first, and the poor will be left far behind. One could argue that the vaccine would be free in government hospitals. One shouldn’t be surprised if the profit-making manufacturers would be more inclined to serve the ones who can pay more. Thus, many will be left behind.
Therefore, with large population unvaccinated and the crisis looming large, the only strategy left for the government will then be to impose lockdowns. However, given the labour force composition in India, those who can afford to “work from home” are those who would have already got their vaccines at the “market price”, while those who couldn’t afford will also not be able to stay home especially given the stressed economy. This is particularly true of households who do not have a steady income flow and/or are daily wage labourers.
Thus, neither can an effective lockdown be imposed, nor can there be large scale adherence nor is it desirable. As a result, the current vaccination strategy will neither have significant dent on the severity or spread. If anything, the government must get the informal sector employees vaccinated at a war footing. It can use innovative data collation techniques to identify such beneficiaries if needed. 
If the government wants to continue with its multi-party Centre, state and private entities procuring separately, it must clearly have a plan as to who should procure for which target group although there seems to be little merit in such decentralized procurement. The price barrier to get vaccinated must be the last bottleneck the government needs.
---
*Professor at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Gurgaon; research interests include data analytics and public policy

Comments

Partha P Mandal said…
Very good unbiased analysis. Thanks

TRENDING

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

Displaced from Bangladesh, Buddhist, Hindu groups without citizenship in Arunachal

By Sharma Lohit  Buddhist Chakma and Hindu Hajongs were settled in the 1960s in parts of Changlang and Papum Pare district of Arunachal Pradesh after they had fled Chittagong Hill Tracts of present Bangladesh following an ethnic clash and a dam disaster. Their original population was around 5,000, but at present, it is said to be close to one lakh.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Anti-Rupala Rajputs 'have no support' of numerically strong Kshatriya communities

By Rajiv Shah  Personally, I have no love lost for Purshottam Rupala, though I have known him ever since I was posted as the Times of India representative in Gandhinagar in 1997, from where I was supposed to do political reporting. In news after he made the statement that 'maharajas' succumbed to foreign rulers, including the British, and even married off their daughters them, there have been large Rajput rallies against him for “insulting” the community.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Youth as game changers in Lok Sabha polls? Young voter registration 'is so very low'

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Young voters will be the game changers in 2024. Do they realise this? Does it matter to them? If it does, what they should/must vote for? India’s population of nearly 1.3 billion has about one-fifth 19.1% as youth. With 66% of its population (808 million) below the age of 35, India has the world's largest youth population. Among them, less than 40% of those who turned 18 or 19 have registered themselves for 2024 election. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), just above 1.8 crore new voters (18-and 19-year-olds) are on the electoral rolls/registration out of the total projected 4.9 crore new voters in this age group.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.