Controversial choice of Justice Mishra for NHRC? BJP 'follows' a Congress precedent

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
Former Supreme Court Judge Arun Mishra has taken over as chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission NHRC). Mishra was over-staying in his official residence after his retirement and had not vacated the place and sought extension under one pretext or other.
It is mandated that only former Chief Justice of Supreme Court is eligible to be the chairperson of NHRC, but because of non-availability of an 'eligible' person, the government amended the law in order to allow any former judge of the Supreme Court to be NHRC chairperson.
NHRC came into existence after tremendous international pressure on India on human rights issues. At the time of its formation in 1993, the then government led by PV Narsimha Rao appointed Justice Ranganath Mishra, former Chief Justice of India, as its first head. He is known to have protected those big names of the Congress party that were involved in the 1984 anri-Sikh pogrom in Delhi.
Shockingly NHRC under him ruled:
"The commission therefore accept the submission advanced before it that the incidents against the Sikhs on October 31, 1984 started as a natural reaction to the situation and at that stage there was no organised attempt to cause or spread violence by rioting spread against Sikhs. The commission however reiterated that the Sikhs as a community has not committed any crime and were not answerable for the abominable attempt of the assailants."
Ranganath Mishra got awarded for his service to the Congress and protecting Narsimha Rao, the most inefficient home minister of India when Indira Gandhi was assassinated. The Congress then enjoyed unchallenged power violated all norms and procedures while appointing him. After retirement from NHRC, Rangnath Mishra was appointed as Rajya Sabha member by the Congress for the period 1998-2004.
BJP is following the same textbook case started by the Congress, and the two Mishras are the common beneficiaries. Justice Arun Mishra during his tenure pushed law against the marginalised and protected the interests of the government. As a Supreme Court judge, he said that the Prime Minister was a visionary and a global leader. In various cases of corruption, he protected the corporate houses and the government.
Arun Mishra broke precedent and sat in a committee which was made to review his own judgement. In the case of compensation related to land acquisition, he shamelessly proclaimed that if the farmers do not take compensation, the amount should deposited in the treasury and it should be regarded as paid. He protected big business interests and stood against the marginalised.
However, the biggest anti-human rights judgement of Arun Mishra came on February 13, 2019 when he ordered eviction of one million adivasis from their own homeland without considering the crucial aspect of their rehabilitation. Making every indigenous person look criminal, Arun Mishra's judgment showed what ails Indian judicial system and why it is extremely necessary to have more judges from the marginalised sections in our top judicial services.
Though the Supreme Court stayed the order, it had already done the damage. There are many such cases where the victims of evictions too were shown no mercy and 'developmental' projects were approved without considering issues of honourable rehabilitation of the rural or urban poor.
Hence, the man whose track record of being fair towards marginalised, Dalits, adivasis has been seemingly unfair, Arun Mishra's appointment as NHRC chairperson is a signal by the current regime to actually use the human rights context to deny justice to the marginalised. One cannot expect justice at the hands of those who when in full power actually denied them every opportunity.
The irony of our institutional bodies related to the rights of the marginalised or human rights is that they have no space for civil society activists or campaigners. These institutions have become an easy space to provide favour to those who have 'given' their 'services' to the government. Institutions have become hogwash and are being used to provide legitimacy to the misdeeds of the state. Yet, they will represent India at all the international forums and deny everything that the people are fighting for.
We don't expect government bodies to do miracles but they have been useful on many occasions, especially when the head of the institution is determined to fight for the cause of human rights and marginalised communities and people. NHRC has done many things with the help of civil society organisations.
Arun Mishra can undo many things of the past by destroying all that NHRC has stood for by helping the marginalised and the poor in getting justice. Will he be able to do so or will he accept everything that the government does as it is headed by a 'visionary leader'?
---
"Human rights defender

Comments

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

The rise of the civilizational state: Prof. Pratap Bhanu Mehta warns of new authoritarianism

By A Representative Noted political theorist and public intellectual Professor Pratap Bhanu Mehta delivered a poignant reflection on the changing nature of the Indian state today, warning that the rise of a "civilizational state" poses a significant threat to the foundations of modern democracy and individual freedom. Delivering the Achyut Yagnik Memorial Lecture titled "The Idea of Civilization: Poison or Cure?" at the Ahmedabad Management Association, Mehta argued that India is currently witnessing a self-conscious political project that seeks to redefine the state not as a product of a modern constitution, but as an instrument of an ancient, authentic civilization.

Why experts say replacing MGNREGA could undo two decades of rural empowerment

By A Representative A group of scientists, academics, civil society organisations and field practitioners from India and abroad has issued an open letter urging the Union government to reconsider the repeal of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and to withdraw the newly enacted Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025. The letter, dated December 27, 2025, comes days after the VB–G RAM G Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 16 and subsequently approved by both Houses of Parliament, formally replacing the two-decade-old employment guarantee law.

NYT: RSS 'infiltrates' institutions, 'drives' religious divide under Modi's leadership

By Jag Jivan A comprehensive New York Times investigation published on December 26, 2025, chronicles the rise of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) — characterized as a far-right Hindu nationalist organization — from a shadowy group founded in 1925 to the world's largest right-wing force, marking its centenary in 2025 with unprecedented influence and mainstream acceptance. Prime Minister Narendra Modi , who joined the RSS as a young boy and later became a full-time campaigner before being deputized to its political wing in the 1980s, delivered his strongest public tribute to the group in his August 2025 Independence Day address. Speaking from the Red Fort , he called the RSS a "giant river" with dozens of streams touching every aspect of Indian life, praising its "service, dedication, organization, and unmatched discipline." The report describes how the RSS has deeply infiltrated India's institutions — government, courts, police, media, and academia — ...

India’s universities lag global standards, pushing students overseas: NITI Aayog study

By Rajiv Shah A new Government of India study, Internationalisation of Higher Education in India: Prospects, Potential, and Policy Recommendations , prepared by NITI Aayog , regrets that India’s lag in this sector is the direct result of “several systemic challenges such as inadequate infrastructure to provide quality education and deliver world-class research, weak industry–academia collaboration, and outdated curricula.”

Interfaith cooperation in Punjab village as Sikhs and Hindus support mosque construction

By Bharat Dogra A recent heart-warming report on Sikh and Hindu families helping to build a mosque in a village of Punjab deserves wide attention. It is such examples that truly strengthen national unity. There are many instances of mutual respect and cooperation among people of different religions and faiths that need to be better known today.

'Caste oppression ignored': NCERT textbooks reflect ideological bias, says historian

By A Representative The Indian History Forum organized a webinar titled “Rewriting the Past: Distortions and Ideological Interventions in NCERT History Textbooks” on 22 December 2025. The session featured historian Dr Ruchika Sharma, who critically examined recent changes in NCERT history textbooks and their implications for historical understanding and social cohesion among millions of students across the country.

Investment in rule of law a corporate imperative, not charity: Business, civil society leaders

By A Representative In a compelling town hall discussion hosted at L.J School of Law , prominent voices from industry and civil society underscored that corporate investment in strengthening the rule of law is not an act of charity but a critical business strategy for building a safer, stronger, and developed India by 2047. The dialogue, part of the Unmute podcast series, examined the intrinsic link between ethical business conduct , robust legal frameworks, and sustainable national development, against the sobering backdrop of India ranking 79th out of 142 countries on the global Rule of Law Index .

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra* Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Search This Blog