Skip to main content

Controversial choice of Justice Mishra for NHRC? BJP 'follows' a Congress precedent

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*

Former Supreme Court Judge Arun Mishra has taken over as chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission NHRC). Mishra was over-staying in his official residence after his retirement and had not vacated the place and sought extension under one pretext or other.
It is mandated that only former Chief Justice of Supreme Court is eligible to be the chairperson of NHRC, but because of non-availability of an 'eligible' person, the government amended the law in order to allow any former judge of the Supreme Court to be NHRC chairperson.
NHRC came into existence after tremendous international pressure on India on human rights issues. At the time of its formation in 1993, the then government led by PV Narsimha Rao appointed Justice Ranganath Mishra, former Chief Justice of India, as its first head. He is known to have protected those big names of the Congress party that were involved in the 1984 anri-Sikh pogrom in Delhi.
Shockingly NHRC under him ruled:
"The commission therefore accept the submission advanced before it that the incidents against the Sikhs on October 31, 1984 started as a natural reaction to the situation and at that stage there was no organised attempt to cause or spread violence by rioting spread against Sikhs. The commission however reiterated that the Sikhs as a community has not committed any crime and were not answerable for the abominable attempt of the assailants."
Ranganath Mishra got awarded for his service to the Congress and protecting Narsimha Rao, the most inefficient home minister of India when Indira Gandhi was assassinated. The Congress then enjoyed unchallenged power violated all norms and procedures while appointing him. After retirement from NHRC, Rangnath Mishra was appointed as Rajya Sabha member by the Congress for the period 1998-2004.
BJP is following the same textbook case started by the Congress, and the two Mishras are the common beneficiaries. Justice Arun Mishra during his tenure pushed law against the marginalised and protected the interests of the government. As a Supreme Court judge, he said that the Prime Minister was a visionary and a global leader. In various cases of corruption, he protected the corporate houses and the government.
Arun Mishra broke precedent and sat in a committee which was made to review his own judgement. In the case of compensation related to land acquisition, he shamelessly proclaimed that if the farmers do not take compensation, the amount should deposited in the treasury and it should be regarded as paid. He protected big business interests and stood against the marginalised.
However, the biggest anti-human rights judgement of Arun Mishra came on February 13, 2019 when he ordered eviction of one million adivasis from their own homeland without considering the crucial aspect of their rehabilitation. Making every indigenous person look criminal, Arun Mishra's judgment showed what ails Indian judicial system and why it is extremely necessary to have more judges from the marginalised sections in our top judicial services.
Though the Supreme Court stayed the order, it had already done the damage. There are many such cases where the victims of evictions too were shown no mercy and 'developmental' projects were approved without considering issues of honourable rehabilitation of the rural or urban poor.
Hence, the man whose track record of being fair towards marginalised, Dalits, adivasis has been seemingly unfair, Arun Mishra's appointment as NHRC chairperson is a signal by the current regime to actually use the human rights context to deny justice to the marginalised. One cannot expect justice at the hands of those who when in full power actually denied them every opportunity.
The irony of our institutional bodies related to the rights of the marginalised or human rights is that they have no space for civil society activists or campaigners. These institutions have become an easy space to provide favour to those who have 'given' their 'services' to the government. Institutions have become hogwash and are being used to provide legitimacy to the misdeeds of the state. Yet, they will represent India at all the international forums and deny everything that the people are fighting for.
We don't expect government bodies to do miracles but they have been useful on many occasions, especially when the head of the institution is determined to fight for the cause of human rights and marginalised communities and people. NHRC has done many things with the help of civil society organisations.
Arun Mishra can undo many things of the past by destroying all that NHRC has stood for by helping the marginalised and the poor in getting justice. Will he be able to do so or will he accept everything that the government does as it is headed by a 'visionary leader'?
---
"Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

Nobel laureates join international figures, seek release of Bhima Koregaon accused activists

Nobel laureates Olga Tokarczuk,  Wole Soyinka Counterview Desk  As many as 57 top international personalities, including Nobel laureates, academics, human rights defenders, lawyers cultural personalities, and members of Parliament of European countries, have urged the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India to ensure immediate release of human rights defenders in India “into safe conditions”.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Russia, China to call the shots in Middle East, as Muslim nations turn into house of cards

By Haider Abbas* Only a naive would buy that the ‘situation of ceasefire’ between the State of Israel and Hamas would continue, as if the foiled attempt to demolish Al Aqsa this time, is not be repeated, if not in any near future then in sometime to come. Israel already has spurned the ‘ceasefire’ by storming Al Aqsa after the Friday prayers on May 21.

Collapse of healthcare system? Why 90% of Covid patients treated at home survived

By Bobby Ramakant, Sandeep Pandey* Well known Hindustani classical singer Padma Vibhu shan Channulal Mishra, chosen as one of the proposers of Narendra Modi in Lok Sabha elections, lost his wife and elder daughter to Covid in private hospitals in Varanasi. Younger daughter has accused Medwin Hospital of charging Rs 1.5 lakh for treatement of her sister and not being able to explain the cause of death. Pandit Channulal Mishra has asked for a probe into his daughter’s death from the Chief Minister. The family has also asked for the CCTV footage of the ward where deceased daughter was admitted for a week.

Modi-led regime 'contributed' 60% to rise of global poverty, yet Hindutva is intact

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* In recent years, the Hindutva politics has caused long term damage to India and Indians. The so called 56-inch macho PM, the propaganda master manufactures and survives all political crisis including the current mismanagement of the Coronavirus pandemic in India. In spite of deaths and destitutions, the social, cultural, economic and religious base of Hindutva is intact.

Rooted in mistrust? Covid-19’s march into rural India is a very different ball game

By Sudhir Katiyar* As the Covid-19 virus penetrates rural India, the rural communities are responding very differently from their urban counterparts who rushed to the hospitals. The rural communities are avoiding the public health facilities and any mention of the disease. The note argues that this supposedly irrational response is based on a deep-seated mistrust of the state by the rural communities. It can not be resolved with routine Information, Education and Communication (IEC) measures suggested in the Government of India SOP for tackling Covid-19 in rural areas.

Hunger, lack of food security behind India's 'slip' in UN's sustainable development rank

By Dr Gian Singh*  According to a report released by the United Nations on June 6, 2021, India's ranking of achieving Sustainable Development based on the 17 Social Development Goals (SDGs) set by the 193 countries in the 2003 agenda, which was 115th last year, has slipped to 117th position this year. India ranks not only the lowest among the BRICS countries -- Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa but also below the four South Asian countries -- Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Bangladesh.

Courageous, in-depth attempt to confirm common spiritual values of Christ, Buddha

By RB Sreekumar, IPS*  All religions, both theistic and atheistic designed conceptual and practical architecture, for holistic and comprehensive elevation and enlightenment of humanity. PK Vijayan, in his novel “Nirvana of Jesus Christ” (Notion Press, 2020) through creative imagination portrayed personality evolution of the two progenitors of God-centric and sagaciously logical major religions – Jesus Christ of Christianity and Gautama Buddha of Buddhism.

Why hasn't Govt of India responded to US critique of freedom of religion under Modi?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ* About two weeks ago, on May 12, 2021, the US Secretary of State Antony J Blinken released in Washington the ‘2020 International Religious Freedom Report.’ This official annual report of the US Government details the status of religious freedom in nearly 200 foreign countries and territories and describes US actions to support religious freedom worldwide. Mandated by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, this report highlights the fact that ‘religious freedom is both a core American value and a universal human right’.