Skip to main content

There is nothing sacrosanct about Pranab, but he being brahmin was important for RSS... as also for others

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
Pranab Mukherjee has paid 'gIorious' tribute to RSS founder Hedgewar as a great son of India. At the same point of time he also spoke of 'constitutional patriotism'. Yes, people like us have been speaking about constitutional morality but Pranab Da also knows that such things will fail when constitution does not become part of our life, not to be used suitably by everyone according to their convenience.
There are many who felt that Pranab Mukherjee did well and spoke at the Sangh Parivar platform and put his 'strong' viewpoint and there are millions others who felt 'betrayed'. Many said, would Pranab go to attend any political meeting organised by other political outfits of either Muslims or Christian organisations? There is no doubt that RSS's inviting guest is nothing but to project its image as 'Iiberal’ organisation.
Second, it is also clever in knowing people's profile. We all know Pranab Mukherjee a die hard brahmin whose Janeu is visible during the nine days fasting at his home town every year. Such learned persons, full of 'knowledge', still follow those casteist traditions reflects the whole mindset. He gave an idea that constitutional patriotism alone can unite us but he would never dare to say that it is the brahmanical forces who are hell bent to destroy this country. After all what does RSS mean about Indian culture? It means a culture of brahmanical hegemony, that too of pure Nagpuri brahmins.
I did not have any expectations from Pranab. I always felt he was a typical babu who is 'expert' in nitty gritties and Indira Gandhi used his quality. There are hundreds of babus in the secretariat and offices who know more than their bosses, but for being a leader you need more than mere technical knowledge. You need courage to say things and you must have convictions.
Can any one say Pranab has convictions? Can Pranab ever come close to say Arjun Singh, a man much discarded by Delhi elite but was brilliant and never compromised on his secular values? When did Pranab speak about social justice in his entire career even as he hailed from Bengal, which has a huge Dalit and Muslim population? Where were his principles when he met Bal Thackrey for his own campaign?
Pranab knows well that the same RSS and its internet goons have been carrying on campaign against Sonia Gandhi and the Nehru family. Sonia was targeted for her foreign origin. Rather than appreciating the woman who made India her home, it continued to vilify her. Question is, how long will we justify our softness towards such an organisation whose ideas are absolutely farcical and supremacists? Though they abuse Nehru they will find a photograph here or there suggesting that he attended their meeting. If Nehru had a soft corner then why they didn't invite him?
Krishna Gopal has written about Babasaheb Ambedkar's relationship with RSS leaders. We know for fact, that at the highest level, leaders do not get personal and will not insult individually, but to suggest that all those who met them in person support their viewpoint is mischievous and scandalous. None of these leaders ever attended their platform and spoke in admiration for their 'politics'. Even if someone has spoken several decade back, when the organisation was an isolated urbanised one, it is a much different thing than today when the organisation wields enormous power and guide the ruling party.
It is important to understand whether RSS really believes in dialogue or not. What are the dialogues it wants? It has used the bogey of culture to make you surrender and plant stories against you in the media. Will the Sangh Parivar uphold what Mukherjee said, 'value of constitution' and rule of law? Should we accept whatever the constitution says or should we say that the constitution must adhere to all the highest standards of human dignity and human rights, right to choice as defined in international laws, and various human rights covenants?
We admit that at the moment defending the constitution is the best thing, but it is equally important that RSS is influencing the government to change various things. We need to oppose them. When we say respect the constitution, it means respect the constitution in original, and not as per the amended version on the advise of Sangh Parivar. Can we accept the rules framed to humiliate the minorities?
Pranab Mukherjee is a drawing room politician. He could win his first Lok Sabha poll in 2004, thinking he could have become prime minister. Well, as an individual he has every right to become the prime minister, but that depends on the party in power.
There is nothing sacrosanct about Pranab, but some factors that his being brahmin was important for RSS and others. The other factor was his close association with Reliance. That is the reason that for long there was a whisper that Reliance was forcing Modi to work for a second term for Mukherjee.
Pranab Mukherjee is a senior citizen now and may be seen as a consensus candidate in case there is crisis. We hope this situation will not arise in India, as there are enough leaders. India needs political leaders with clear vision and unambiguous characteristics, and not those who can define things according to their convenience.
In his life Pranab da rarely spoke of Ambedkar. I would suggest him to visit Nagpur during the Dhamma Chakra Pravartan Diwas and see a million people turning up to pay their tribute to Babasaheb Ambedkar and celebrate the Dhamma. We would like him to speak there and address the nation.
The Bania channels, who have been dutifully broadcasting the absurd drill of the so-called Swayamsevaks, have never ever done a live show of the Deekshabhumi event. Nagpur is the birth place of RSS, but in the city the Sangh is totally outclassed by Ambedkarites. Mukherjee is called a knowledgeable person but I dont know how much he knows that there is a huge congregation every year at Deekshabhumi, where people flock on their own.
Will Mukherjee ever show his willingness to visit Deekshabhumi and address the huge gathering of the people there? I am sure, he will get more enlightenment there than he got at the Sangh Parivar's headquarter. Was it not shameful that an organisation claiming to be more patriotic could not unfurl the national flag and sing national anthem? For last four years, the goons in the name of patriotism have been beating up people, giving licence of nationalism and patriotism to them but rarely do the same.
I agree with Shramistha Mukherjee, his daughter, who said that only visuals will remain and would be used in future by the fake news agencies of the Sangh Parivar. The speech would also be used that way. Pranab Da is a politicians and played his game but it will be a disaster if he considers himself an alternative of the current government, or is attempting to be a consensus candidate. We hope it will not happen.
Pranab should have been speaking as conscience keeper of our country, rather he has legitimised an organisation, which is responsible for all the chaos and anarchy that we have in the country today. It means nothing to say that he was a Congressman all his life. Janue i.e. sacred brahmanical thread, wins over ideology.
---
Source: The author's Facebook timeline

Comments

Radhika Ramaseshan said…
RSS has come a long long way from its brahmin fixation. Two of its sarsanghachalaks Deoras and Rajendra Singh were not brahmins. If it was brahmin centered it wouldn't have grown and expanded the way it has!

TRENDING

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.