Skip to main content

Pranab Mukherjee didn't elevate august office he held as President, just "followed" his predecessors' footsteps

By Masood Peshimam*
When late Dr Zakir Hussain, on become the President of India, went to pay obeisance to the Shankaracharya of Puri, it must have been a quest for acquiring more acceptance for a “Muslim” President. Whatever maybe the compulsion, it did not amount to elevating the august office of the President.
Then there was late Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, who was bludgeoned into subservience in signing the Emergency proclamation. Ahmed could not have his way beyond expressing his muted reservation over the draconian proclamation of the Emergency. The situation was quite grim, and Indira Gandhi was hell bent on promoting the aggressive agenda of suspending, or rather crushing, fundamental rights. He had no potential to resist and fish in troubled waters. He died after some time in the mysterious circumstances. He also did no credit to the august office of the President, either.
The condition continued to be sickening when late Giani Zail Singh occupied the august office. It was the same Zail Singh who has learnt to have taken pride in expressing his desire to sweep Indira Gandhi’s house.
Pranab Mukharjee has had enormous political clout in the Congress. Congress always backed him, though he could not win an election for pretty long. He had to be accommodated in the upper house. Such was his clout that he was chosen to contest the Presidential election.
Notwithstanding the incessant backing of the Congress, and being the man of scholarship and statesmanship, Pranab, in his own ebullience to occupy the highest office of the land, went out of way to woo Matoshree in Mumbai. The discordant noises raised did not deter Pranab in paying respect to the Thackreys, who dictated terms to him.
Pranab’s connections with parochial and communal forces matured in to support his presidential candidature. This constituted a deep setback to the healthy traditions of democracy, secularism and cosmopolitan ethos. His political flirtation with communal and chauvinist forces did not raise much of an eyebrow in his own party. Clearly, he had already compromised with fascist and radical forces in his quest to occupy the august office.
What has followed next is Pranab, as ex-President, showing no compunction in visiting the RSS headquarter in Nagpur to address RSS volunteers. On the eve of the function, Congress made a lot of hue and cry over the visit, stating that the former President, who was quite wedded to secular values, had significantly compromised with the forces which are out to polarise society in the name of religion. It said that the ex-President’s presence signaled setback to the tenets and principles of secularism.
However, with the occurrence of the event at the RSS headquarters in Nagpur, Congress looked satisfied. It said that Pranab talked of pluralism, cosmopolitanism, communal harmony, sense of toleration secular values and sense of accommodation. He also said that variation in culture, faith and language make India a unique nation. He stressed on composite Indian culture, shaped by shared traditions and culture, stemming from mutual toleration and understanding. He said he was there to share his concept of nation, nationalism and patriotism in the context of India. He added, our national identity has emerged after a long process of confluence and assimilation, and our multiple cultures and faiths make us special and unique.
Pranab’s speech might have given relief to the Congress. But notwithstanding how Congress took the veteran’s words, the fact remains that his words were routinely plain admiration of the universal values, without unambiguous condemnation of those remaining obsessed by breaching the objectives he lauded. He could not afford to earn the ire of the RSS and its followers by joining issues with them on threats to democratic secular values.
Indeed, Pranab chose to remain silent over the gruesome mob lynching in the name of cow protection, which has claimed a heavy toll of Muslims, and at times victimized Dalits. He chose to remain silent over the gruesome violence in the name of love jihad. The matter has gone to such an extent that in a love affair of a Muslim boy and a Hindu girl, who were detained by the police, the girl committed suicide in the police station. In another gruesome incident, both Hindu girl and Muslim boy involved in deep love committed suicide.
Pranab remained silent over the ruthless beating of Muslims on one count or the other over the imaginary reasons, leading to gruesome deaths. Most inhuman and vicious assaults on Muslims witnessed with the upsurge of the BJP surprisingly escaped his comment. He did not suggest any remedy prevent grim lynching incidents, even though these have aroused the concern the world over.Nor did he question RSS’ divisive dogma of one religious, one culture. He did not utter a word to restrain on fascist or communal forces targeting minorities, particularly Muslims, in the garb of aggressive nationalism.
It’s good to note that Pranab referred to the great Indian civilization immensely contributing to the growth of human life. However, he touched upon Muslim invasion. It needs to be noted that invasion was not restricted to Muslims alone. Before the advent of Muslims, there was military expansion by others, too, and it constitutes an inalienable part of history.
It is the confluence and assimilation of Hindu-Muslim influences which gave birth to our new cosmopolitan culture, leaving its impact and imprint on language, art, culture, food habits, architecture and different aspects of life. Indeed, Muslim contribution influencing various aspects of life cannot be undermined. Any attempt to interpret Muslim or any other influence as inferior is born of prejudice and myopic approach.Any attempt to erase the Muslim contribution is a blot on our civilizational values.
While referring to the freedom struggle, Pranab massively eulogized the services rendered by Gandhi, Nehru, Tilak, Patel, Surendranath Bannerji, but forgot to mention Dr Ambedkar. He was bound to forget Maulana Azad, as linking Muslim contribution in enriching nation’s life and culture has become something of an anathema. This is how we flaunt our secularism and sense of justice.
We are so obsessed with prejudice and bias that we are reluctant to mention the great sacrifice of Bahadur Shah Zafar in the 1857 mutiny, which pioneered the freedom struggle. Can we forget his poignant tragedy when he was presented the beheaded heads of his children for the breakfast? What a catastrophe!
In fact, the very presence of the ex-President at the valedictory function at Nagpur is open to dispute, as Gandhi was murdered by Nathuram Godse, an ardent admirer of RSS or Hindutva ideology. RSS now is trying distance itself from Gandhi’s murder, but the fact remains that VD Savarkar, whose treatise "Hindutva! Who is a Hindu?” inspired the formation of RSS, which censured Gandhi and freedom struggle, both.
Against this background, it is relevant to quote what Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay said in the
“Asian Age” (June 15, 2018): “This oft repeated association needs retelling, because at the time of Gandhi’s assassination, although Godse was not associated with either RSS or the Mahasabha, he remained symbiotically connected with ideas of the two. The views which motivated him into taking the extreme decision were shaped in the two ideological nurseries. There also exist sufficient grounds to believe that his association with Savarkar, and consequent knowledge about plot, was deeper than could be legally established”.
RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat also favours unifying society. However, while urging the unification of society, he does not miss to play the communal card. His talk of unity in diversity with the show of muscular Hindutva cannot go hand-in-hand. The talk of unity is an absurd proposition if it seeks commitment to the concept of one culture, one religion and the concept of nationhood blended with aggressive religious overtones.
It is relevant to quote what ALI Chougle said in “Free Press Journal” June 12, 2018: “Bhagwat used the cover of unity in diversity to camouflage his core belief that India is primarily defined by one religion and culture. No matter Bhagwat’s claim about his organisation’s commitment to ‘unifying’ society the RSS has rarely shown its enthusiasm and commitment to preserve the edifice of secular India and celebrate its diversity. On the contrary through its ideology of majoritarian India, the RSS sees the minorities, particularly the Muslim, through the prism of unsavoury communalism unpatriotic and anti-national”.
It ‘s not the question of RSS alone, but of any communal organization, Hindu, Muslim, Christian or of any other flavor. They are all a setback to the democratic secular values, hampering the very quest for peace and prosperity in the name of unsavoury narrow partisan ends. It’s not known as to what leverage RSS has achieved with the presence of the ex-President, but Pranab’s secular identity is now open to question.
---
*Advocate based in Kalyan, Maharashtra

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

India's 80% construction sites "unsafe", deaths 20 times higher than those in Britain

By Rajiv Shah
The Government of India may be seeking to project India’s construction sector as the country’s second-largest employer of the country after agriculture, providing jobs to more than 44 million people, and contributing nearly 9% to the national GDP, yet, ironically, its workforce is more unprotected than any other industrial sector of the country. Data suggest that the possibility of a fatality is five times more likely in the construction industry  than in a manufacturing industry, and the risk of a major injury is 2.5 times higher.

India sans Modi preferable, Congress worthier recipient of Indians’ votes: The Economist

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded and crucial commentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the electoral political battle is on, influential British weekly “The Economist”, has declared that “Indians, who are in the midst of voting in a fresh election, would be better off with a different leader”, even as pointing out that that under Modi, “India’s ruling party poses a threat to democracy.”