Skip to main content

World Bank report: India "improves" in providing services to world market, but "fails" to integrate South Asia

LPI among top lower middle income group countries
By A Representative
A new World Bank report, which rates the logistics performance of 160 countries for on the basis availability of infrastructure to international traders, has found that India considerably improved its performance from the 54th position to 35th between 2014 and 2016.
Rating India as No 1 country in the lower middle income group, the report, titled “Connecting to Compete 2016 : Trade Logistics in the Global Economy”, seeks to analyze six major parameters while arriving at what it calls logistics performance index (LPI).
These are efficiency of customs and border management clearance, quality of trade and transport infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, competence and quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach consignees within scheduled or expected delivery times.
Even as suggesting the India and China are among the list of countries that over-perform their income group peers, the report, however, regrets, “In South Asia, lack of integration means that the good logistics performance of India does not improve that of its neighbours.”
Among the five BRICS countries, the report finds Brazil ranking 55th,Russia 99th, India 35th, China 27th and South Africa. It finds Germany as the best performing country, with an LPI score of 4.23, and Syria as the lowest, with a score of 1.60 (equivalent to 19 percent of Germany’s score on a scale from 1 to 5).
Seeking to influence policy makers of multinational corporations and governments on where to invest and where not to on the basis of type of logistics available in each country, the report states, “Efficient logistics connects firms to domestic and international markets through reliable supply chain networks.”
The report says, the LPI seeks to “understand key logistics impediments worldwide and to enable well-informed policy making and business decisions”, adding, “Logistics refers to a series of services and activities, such as transportation, warehousing, and brokerage, that help to move goods and establish supply chains across and within borders.”
The 2016 LPI data are based on a survey conducted between October and December 2015 and between March and April 2016 among 1,051 respondents at international logistics companies in 132 countries. Among the main groups interviewed are senior executives (53 percent), area or country managers (15 percent), and department managers (16 percent).
“These groups of professionals have oversight responsibilities or are directly involved in day-to-day operations not only from company headquarters but also from country offices”, the report states, adding, “Logistics performance both in international trade and domestically is central to the economic growth and competitiveness of countries.”
It appears, the report does not seek to address existing data of internal connectivity, particularly in large countries. It says, “The LPI measures performance at key international gateways in countries such as India and China, but does not address how easy or difficult it is to move goods to the hinterland.”
However, it admits, “Such movements are important from developmental and equity standpoints. Internal trade costs likely remain high in many countries, and reducing them could make a significant difference to the lives of producers and consumers outside main cities.”

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”