Skip to main content

Act against cow vigilantes and we will start lifting dead cattle: Dalit community leaders tell new Gujarat CM

A vehicle used to transport dead cattle
By A Representative
Is the attempt to take pledge from rural Dalits belonging to the Rohit (chamar) community to give up the caste-based occupation of "scavenging" cattle carcasses during the 350-kilometre-long protest padyatra or foot march from Ahmedabad to Una, which began on August 5, facing a major hurdle in the form of economic compulsion?
It would seem to, if the latest representation to new chief minister Vijay Rupani by community leaders involved in tanning is any indication. Most of the tanners are poor, and have no other means of livelihood but to "scavenge" dead cattle and skin it in extremely unhygienic conditions.   
The padyatra is led by Jignesh Mevani, an Ahmedabad-based human rights lawyer-turned-politician, to protest against the age-old practice against the backdrop of cow vigilantes bashing up four Dalit boys in Una in Saurashtra region of Gujarat after tying them up SUV on July 11. The boys were skinning dead cattle in a village not very far from Una town. The padyatra ends on August 15, Independence Day, at Una.
Though attached with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the padyatra he leads is “totally apolitical”, Mevani reportedly claims, even as insisting, he has "political ambitions." Most of the padyatri leaders belong to Ahmedabad.
In a surprise move, meanwhile, community leaders from Surendranagar district have told chief minister Rupani in a representation that they would not pick up carcasses only till the state government takes steps to stop “atrocities” by cow vigilantes, who “harass them” on way to the spots where they to the skinning job.
Led by Natubhai Parmar, a social worker from the Rohit community and attached with Dalits rights NGO Navsarjan Trust, and accompanied by six others, all belonging to Surendranagar district, the representation said that cow vigilantes, in alliance with cops, “harass them in order to extort money” as they transport dead cattle, its carrion, bones and skin.
A poor woman doing the skinning job in the open
“These vigilantes demand identity card to prove that we are tanners”, the representation said, adding, “As we do not have any of it, they accuse us of cow slaughter cows and extort money.” Pointing out that they would not pick up cattle till this harassment stops, the representation demanded a number of steps to turn them into professional tanners.
The demand comes close on the heels of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's call to state governments to take steps against cow vigilantes, “80 per cent of whom are anti-social elements”, he said. Modi was forced to make the statement following nation-wide outrage against the July 11 Una incident.
Far from insisting that they would shed the occupation, the community leaders insisted, the Rohits who are in the job should be allocated plots of land where they could legally do the work of skinning dead cattle. “The plots should be fenced with concrete wall”, it said, adding, “The plots should be provided with necessary infrastructure, including water and power.”
“To transport the dead cattle, we should be given monetary help for buying up vehicles”, the representation said, adding, “These vehicles should be equipped with the necessary equipment to lift dead cattle. And they should be made available tax free.”
Wanting that the Leather Industries Board, which was disbanded in late 1990s, “revived” to help the tanners with “modern technology for continuing with the job in a more scientific way”, the representation said, “Those wish to leave the job should be properly rehabilitated. Agricultural land could be given to those wanting to take up farming.”
“If big industrialists are given huge subsidies, why can't we tanners be helped? We want that tanning be given the status of leather industry”, it said, adding, “We also think we are more capable of managing the state-owned panjrapols (cattle farms) where cows are kept. We should be preferred for the job.”

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.