Skip to main content

Environmental clearance major hurdle in Gujarat: UK consultants report

By Rajiv Shah
Top UK-based consultants Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu’s Indian professionals’ report, “Survey on Business Regulatory Environment for Manufacturing – State Level Assessment”, prepared for the Planning Commission, may have rated Gujarat as No 2 state – next to Haryana – on important industry-related yardsticks which attract investment (read HERE). However, a study of detailed inter-state comparison of the report suggests that Gujarat ranks 16th among 20 major states in obtaining environmental compliance for establishing enterprises, and 15th in getting environmental compliance to them to kick-start operation.
Gujarat’s entrepreneurs, who have been surveyed, have reportedly told Deloitte that it takes 100 days, on an average, to get consent to establish an enterprise, and 106 days to get consent to operate. This is against 29 days in taken to get consent to establish in Kerala, 55 days in Punjab, 60 days in Maharashtra and Chhattigarh, 70 days in Odisha, 78 days in Karnataka, 74 days in Rajasthan, and 90 days in Tamil Nadu. As for getting consent for kick-starting the enterprise, it takes 29 days in Kerala, 36 days taken in Maharashtra, 55 days in Tamil Nadu, 74 days in Haryana, and 85 days in Haryana.
Not without reason, the consultants say, in obtaining consent to obtain environmental clearance, Gujarat is placed at the “bottom 20 percentile of states”. They further say, “Most respondents were not satisfied with their experience in obtaining (clearances) on account of complex documentation requirements, and delays in conducting inspections.” They point out, “Environmental clearance is (an) area which needs to be improved significantly”. By way of advice, they add, “Standard document checklists for submission as well as standard procedures for inspection may be transparently shared…”
Environmental clearance is not the only grey area noticed by the consultants. The report says, “Compliances, registration of license under Factories Act require around 50 days”, and here again Gujarat is below several states. This is because “the application of approval/ renewal processes under Factories Act (is) not online.” Same is the case with “manual processes for other labour law related compliance”. The states which take less number of days than Gujarat are Haryana (11), Andhra Pradesh (35), Odisha (40), and Tamil Nadu (45).
Gujarat, a power surplus state, tops the list of all states in offering power-related clearances – just about 16 days. This is against 60 days taken in Tamil Nadu, 65 days Maharashtra and Karnataka, 71 days in West Bengal, 75 days in Andhra Pradesh, and so on. However, in water-related approvals, it takes 45 days in Gujarat, as against just four days in Punjab, 15 days in Haryana, 30 days in Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. Similarly, in taking fire-related no-objection certificate, it takes 37 days in Gujarat, as against Kerala’s seven days, eight days in Punjab, 16 days in Tamil Nadu, and 17 days in Andhra Pradesh.
Much has been said about Gujarat providing “quickest” land clearances (click HERE). However, the survey suggests that on an average it takes 120 days for land allocation through a state agency, 100 days in for conversion of land for industrial use, 49 days in building approvals. This is against 80 days in land allocation in Haryana and 90 days in Andhra Pradesh. As for land conversion, Gujarat does a much quicker job. But as for building approvals, several states take lesser number of days, including West Bengal (28), Andhra Pradesh (30), Punjab (30), Tamil Nadu (40), Rajasthan (43), and so on.

Comments

Unknown said…
Gujarat Pollution Invigilation body do not visit housing society where sewage treatment plant are install as per environment control board norms. After one year mostly 95 % plants are not in working condition or discharge is not as per PCB norms. This will effect 50 % of river pollution.

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.