Skip to main content

Proposed amendment to Odisha's immovable property regulation has grave implication for India's tribals

By Ashok Shrimali* 
In an important development, the Odisha government is coming up with a new amendment to the Odisha Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property (by Scheduled Tribes) regulations, 1956, which seeks to undermine the fifth schedule of the Indian constitution. The fifth schedule gives special rights to tribals over natural resources, including land, in tribal areas. The amendment, if pushed through, will be the first of its kind in India where the fifth scheduled tribal area land will be easily alienation to non-tribals. The land will be allowed to be sold to a mining company or a corporate house. The implications are grave: The amendment, if passed, will prompt other states too to follow the Odisha “model”.
The result will be, the tribal people will lose their inherent rights and provisions of scheduled area of constitutional safeguard. Already, local tribal groups of Odisha have decided to move to the Supreme Court against the proposed amendment. In a representation to the President of India, Deme Oram, chief coordinator, Adivasi Zamin Bachao Andolan, Sundargarh, Orisha, has demanded cancellation of the proposed amendment of the Odisha Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property (by Scheduled Tribes) regulations, 1956. Expressing “deep concern” over the proposed amendment, the representation insists, the tribal people’s rights over natural resources are “recognized by the Constitution of India’s Article 244 (1).”
The representation says, “After the Independence, government of of Odisha did not provided sufficient opportunities for the economic upliftment of the tribal people. In spite of sacrificing all natural resources (land, water, forest and air) by tribals of this region, they are all deprived from all kind of opportunities generated out of developmental projects. Land of the tribals was taken away through different acts and provisions. They have been uprooted from their ancestral homestead but not rehabilitated till now.”
It points towards how their means of livelihood for survival (forest) were taken away or destroyed by the nearby project areas. The fifth schedule, however, sought to protect and regulate the tribal land and other natural resources. Even then, “different mechanisms” were adopted to take away the tribals’ private land in order to alienate them. “At present the private land of tribals (agricultural land) is less than one percent but population statistic of scheduled tribe is 23 percent within Odisha”, it adds.
The representation say, during the settlement process all the government recorded land in the scheduled areas was transferred to non-tribals, “resulting in genocide of future generation of the scheduled tribe families, as we do not have any access on these lands, restricting the tribals’ growth.”
Speaking on behalf of the Odisha tribals, the representation says, “We strongly affirm that land is not the property of tribal families but it is a resource of our community. Land is our mother and hence it cannot be mortgaged; mortgaging the land means our cultural destruction / our identity will be lost. We will lose all land holdings as we do not know to manage the money.”
It advocates that the proposed amendment is also contravenes the provisions of the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (or PESA), 1996, which activates the firth schedule. It will disturb peace and good governance in scheduled areas will be disturbed as per fifth schedule. “Transfer of tribal land should not be allowed through any means (bank) to non-tribal, which contradicts the decision of Apex Court of India vide P. Rama Reddy & others”, it says.
The representation demands that the “limitation period of 30 years in case of adverse possession of a tribal land by non-tribal should be lifted and the period of unauthorized occupation be calculated with effect from 1956.” It quotes the judgment of the Supreme court vide Amrendra Pratap Singh vs Tej Bahadur Prajapati, which states that “ acquisition of title in favour of a non-tribal by invoking the doctrine of adverse possession over the immovable property belonging to a tribal, is prohibited by law and cannot be countenanced by the court.” It adds, the proposed amendment “contradicts the above fact.”
Calling the amendment as nothing but a lucrative offer, the representation says, “It will not solve any kind of tribal peoples interest in Odisha.” Asking the President to “stop the amendment bill of the Odisha Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property (by Scheduled Tribes) regulations, 1956 (Regulation 2 of 1956).” Already, proposals of the amendment were “deferred by the National Commission on Scheduled Tribe vide the minutes dated November 17, 2009.”
It further demands “restoration of all scheduled tribes land which were alienated earlier on an emergency basis. Land (which were recorded as government category) should be allotted to the scheduled tribe members only in the scheduled areas as per the Fifth Scheduled 5(2)(b).” Also, there should be immediately cancellation of “all the settlement records where government land was transferred to non-tribal members in the scheduled areas.”
Sent to the President via the district collector, Sundargarh, Odisha, and handed over at Rourkela, a a copy of the representation has also been sent to the ministry of tribal affairs, Government of India, National Commission of Scheduled Tribe, ministry of home affairs, Governmment of India, and the ministry of law and Justice, Government of India.

*Senior Gujarat-based activist

Comments

Homes Ulike said…
Your post is really providing good information.. I liked it and enjoyed reading it. Keep sharing such important posts

properties in hyderabad
vipin yadav said…
I adore what you have got right here. You make it entertaining and you still manage to keep it smart.This is truly a great blog thanks for sharing. luxury apartments in bangalore for sale
Raju Kumar said…

Good article. I am experiencing a few of these issues as well..
Flats for Sale in Manikonda

TRENDING

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

UN experts object to GoI move to 'reinforce' trend of prosecution, eviction of tribals

Counterview Desk
In a report sent to the Government of India, three United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs, expressing "concerns" over the failure to ensure "adequate" implementation of the India Forest Rights Act (FRA), have regretted that the Government of India has not cared to reply their previous communications on this.

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

As submergence stares Narmada valley, Patkar says: With powerful in throne, we're helpless

Counterview Desk
Well-known anti-dam organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), plans to begin its “Resist Illegal Submergence in Narmada Valley” satyagraha on August 21 at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, amidst news that the situation in the valley is “critical”, with two persons having already died in flood-related incidents in the upstream of the Sardar Sarovar dam.

RTI Act holy cow for Govt of India? Official insists, don't ask why, when, what, where

By Pankti Jog*
The Government of India appears to have begun treating the Right to Information (RTI) Act as a holy cow. Its officials seem to believe that the Act is a sacred law, under which people shouldn't be questioning its functioning. One recalls what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said while addressing an RTI convention in 2015: “Why should government wait for people to ask information, we will have all information out in the domain, we have nothing to hide."

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.