Skip to main content

Procedural lapses prevailed supreme at environmental public hearing for N-plant, says authoritative letter to GoI

At the public hearing site
By Our Representative
Fresh information is now available on how procedural norms were violated while conducting the environmental public hearing (EPH) on March 5, 2013, for the proposed 6000 MW Mithi Virdi Nuclear Power Plant, to be built by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) in Gujarat. Senior environmentalist Rohit Prajapati has said, the EPH, in the light of this information, "violates" the Union ministry of environment and forests’ (MoEF’s) own Office Memorandum dated December 2, 2009 which  states that “that no environmental impact assessment (IEA)/ environmental management plan (IMP) reports prepared by Consultants who are not registered with NABET (National Accreditation Board for Education and Training)/ QCI (Quality Council of India) shall be considered by the Ministry after June 30, 2010.”
In a letter to PB Rastogi, EAC, Nuclear Power Projects, Paryavaran Bhawan, New Delhi, and V. Rajagopalan, secretary,. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, Prajapati, who heads Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Vadodara, quotes a Supreme Court order dated July 6, 2011 in in T N Godavarman Thriumulpad v/s Union of India & Ors on a real estate project in Okhla area of UP that “a regulatory mechanism should be put in place and till the time such mechanism is put in place, the MoEF should prepare a Panel of Accredited Institutions from which alone the project proponent should obtain the Rapid EIA, and that too on the Terms of Reference to be formulated by the MoEF.”
The top environmentalist states, the letter dated February 18, 2013 of NABET, allowing EIA a public hearing for the nuclear project “is a simple letter to the EIL and not an Office Memorandum.” He adds, “That means it is very clear from the Office Memorandum of MoEF dated December 2, 2009 and Supreme Court order dated July 6, 2011 that the EIA reports that have been prepared by consultants who are not registered with NABET/QCI should not be considered. In contrast, the procedure followed for the Mithi Virdi Nuclear Power Plant, both during the preparation of the EIA report as well as later during the EPH, was erroneous with serious anomalies.”
Prajapati lists following other anomalies:
· The Terms of Reference (ToR) for the MoEF at point No 7 clearly mention that “the study area should cover an area of 10 km radius around the proposed site for conventional pollutants and 30 km radius for radiological parameters.” Instead the EIA report categorically mentions that 30 km for radiological areas of the study will be undertaken in future, the radiological survey is yet to be carried out for 30 Km area and have not been carried out as stipulated by MoEF in the ToR. But this has been clearly violated.
· No villager/village panchayat in the 10-30 km radius was informed or served notice for the public hearing as the rules stipulate by the concerned authorities.
· The EIA report clearly mentions that the resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) plan for the project affected families is under making and the details of the same have not been mentioned in the EIA report as per the ToR No 29 of MoEF (detailed R&R plan/ compensation package in consonance with the national/ state R&R policy for the project affected people, taking into account the socio economic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, landless labourers etc.). No details are available on such a crucial point. Hence the exercise of preparation of EIA report and further that of the public hearing is rendered as a meaningless exercise. Neither there are any details of the ongoing discussions being held with district collector/ commissioner of the concerned area for compensation for land and landed properties, as mentioned in EIA at page number IX.
· The forest clearance required for the forest land acquired for the process has not yet been obtained as per ToR No 10 of EIA (forestry clearance for the forestland involved in the project should be obtained and a copy furnished).
· The ToR No 1 states that “a note on site selection should be given in the EIA.” But the EIA only states that “the site selection committee appointed by the Government of India comprising members from MoEF, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), DAE, and NPCIL have recommended Mithi Virdi as the suitable site for establishing the nuclear power plant (6 X 1000 MWe) capacity Light Water Reactor. The site selection committee has considered various site selection criteria as specified by AERB/MoEF such as location, land availability, transportation accessibility, source of cooling water, meteorology, population, seismic zones, flood analysis, sustainability of the project, other environmental aspects etc. before recommending the suitability of the site for establishing NPP.” But a copy of this report is not annexed with the EIA.
· The proposed plant site is falling under irrigation command area identified by the Gujarat State irrigation department. An application for seeking no objection certificate for development of the proposed project is submitted to irrigation department, Government of Gujarat. Yet again a copy of the no-objection certificate to develop the project in an irrigation command area application is not there in the EIA report, as required by ToR of MoEF.
· The ToR states that “all documents to be properly referenced with index, page numbers and continuous page numbering” and “where data are presented in the report, especially in tables, the period in which the data were collected and the sources should be indicated.” But the EIA violates both at many places.
· The ToR No 34 states that “detailed risk assessment and disaster management plan should be given.” However, in Chapter 7, there is only a discussion on what needs to be included in the disaster management plan, but no real plan has been offered. There is also a reference to a manual on off-site emergency response plans, to be issued by the State Level Emergency Response Committee. However, no such plans are available.
The letter by Prajapati says that AV Shah, regional officer of the Gujarat Pollution Control Board had reassured Rohit Prajapati and Swati Desai, who were representing on behalf of the villagers just before the EPH proceedings that sarpanches of ten villages (Jaspara, Mithi Virdi, Paniyali, Khadarpar, Mandva, Sosiya, Navagam (Nana), Goriyali, Rampar (Garibpura), Bharapara) would be allowed to raise procedural issues after the opening remarks by the collector who chaired the EPH proceedings and the GPCB’s opening remarks on the issue.”The sarpanches had already prepared the written submission for the procedural lapses in the EPH as directed by the authorities. However, when the EPH proceedings started, the first violation of the norms happened, when authorities reneged on their assurances to Rohit Prajapati and Swati Desai”, it adds.
The letter further says, “Jaspara village Sarpanch Shaktisinh Gohil started making the point on procedural lapses soon after the opening remarks, but was prevented by the district collector, who said that Gohil could hold the floor on the lapses only after the NPCIL presentation. This was the second violation, as the collector should have first read the written submission on the procedural lapse and opined on it before going ahead with the hearing.”
The third violation happened with the collectors’ complete disregard for the Delhi High Court judgment dated May 2010, which he was informed through AV Shah in oral discussions. The judgment in the case of Samarth Trust and Other vs Union of India & Others said that “so far as a public hearing is concerned, its scope is limited and confined to those locally affected persons residing in the close proximity of the project site.” At the same time, It should “not preclude or prohibit persons not living in the close proximity of the project site from participating in the public hearing – they too are permitted to participate and express their views for or against the project.”
The fourth violation happened when the collector did not again read the sarpanches’ written submission on procedural lapses, which included the Delhi High Court judgement during the entire EPH, even after the villagers’ walkout, and neither did he express any opinion on it. The collector thus ignored the Delhi High Court judgment, which was a vital point in sarpanches’ representation during the entire EPH.
In fact, the environmentalist says that coercive and terror filled the atmosphere when the EPH was held “to prevent the villagers from making free and fair representation. Not only heavy posse of police force but also private security guards were hired at the EPH site, frisking and checking every entrant, and at places questioning villagers and participants about their antecedents.”
Also, “unnecessary barricades and iron wire fencing between the collector’s dais and the participants area” were put up, “a first ever arrangement during the EPH in recent times in Gujarat. The barricades and iron wire-fencing might have been put for the safety and security of the collector and officials, but they created an atmosphere of coercive tactics that invoked state control and fear over the proceedings of grave public concern.
Also, the collector allowed songs and recordings in favour of the NPCIL to be broadcast from the public address system arranged by the collectorate. “These recordings continued to be played till the EPH proceedings began formally. This is a clear violation of the neutral approach that the collector should have taken on the issue and instead made clear his predisposition on behalf of the NPCIL. On the contrary, the villagers were not only prevented from making free and fair representation; their representations on procedural issues were also ignored during the EPH”, Prajapati said.

Comments

TRENDING

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Modi model? "Refusal" to build Narmada's micro canals, keep Kutch dry; help industry

By Medha Patkar*
This is the latest photograph of the Kutch Branch Canal (KBC) of the Sardar Sarovar, as of April 8! What does it show, expose, and what memories do you recall? Is it dry or dead? Is it a canal or a carcass of the same?

Bill Gates "promoting" GMO, Bt cotton, like cartels that have roots in Hitler's Germany

By Our Representative
World-renowned environmental leader and ecologist Dr Vandana Shiva has expressed concern that Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft Corporation, has joined the bandwagon of “a poison cartel of three" – Monsanto and Bayer, Syngenta and ChemChina, Dow and DuPont – all of whom allegedly have “roots in Hitler’s Germany and finding chemicals to kill people”.

Indian talc products contain "contaminated" asbestos structures, can cause cancer: Study

Counterview Desk
A recent study, using polarizing light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), electron diffraction, and X-ray analysis on multiple over-the-counter Indian talc products for the presence of asbestos, has concluded that large quantities of body talc products are likely to pose a public health risk for asbestos-related diseases, especially for the cancers related to asbestos exposure.

Why are you silent on discrimination against Dalit jawans? Macwan questions Modi

By Rajiv Shah
Close on the heels of releasing his book in Gujarati, "Bhed Bharat", which lists 319 cases of atrocities against Dalits and Adivasis across the country over the last five years, well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan has shot an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, telling him the reasons why he does not want vote for the BJP.

Jharkhand Adivasi lynched to death by mob "chanting" Jai Shri Ram: Fact-finding team

Counterview Desk
On April 10, 2019, Prakash Lakda, a 50-year old Adivasi of Jurmu village of Gumla’s Dumri block, was lynched to death by a mob of men from the Sahu community of neighbouring Jairagi village. Three other victims from Jurmu – Peter Kerketta, Belarius Minj and Janerius Minj – sustained severe injuries due to the beating by the mob. A fact-finding team of Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM), comprising of several activists and representatives of member organisations, conducted a fact-finding inquiry into the incident on April 14-15.

Investigation shows Narmada downstream "seriously" polluted. Reason: apathy, greed

By Rohit Prajapati, Krishnakant, Swati Desai*
Our investigation regarding quality of water flowing in the Narmada river downstream of the Sardar Sarovar Dam (SSD), dated April 6, 2019, between 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. reiterates, what is commonly known now, that the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) is planned without considering its impact on the downstream Narmada River stretch of 161 kilometres, its ecology, biodiversity and fishery, and lakhs of people living close to and dependent on the river directly or indirectly. This, in turn, has led to its present disastrous state.

Emergence of a rare Dalit teacher in IIT-Kanpur "disturbed" certain faculty members

By PS Krishnan, IAS (Retd)*
Dr Subrahmanyam Sadrela, a faculty member in the Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)-Kanpur since January 1, 2018, and one of the rare Dalit members of the faculty in IIT group of institutions, is facing the threat of revocation of his PhD thesis, and thereby also jeopardizing his job and career.

RTE in remote areas? Govt of India "plans" to close down 2.4 lakh schools

By Srijita Majumder*
The Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, came into effect on April 1, 2010, for the first time made it obligatory on the part of the State to provide free and compulsory education to all children from 6-14 years of age in India. The Act, despite its limitations, had progressive elements like neighbourhood schools, community participation, ban on corporal punishment, no detention, continuous and comprehensive evaluation and it hence it appeared that India was not far from achieving universal elementary education.

Election Commission suffering from worst-ever "credibility crisis": Ex-bureaucrats

Counterview Desk
In an open letter to President Ram Nath Kovind, a group of ex-bureaucrats have lamented ‘weak-kneed’ responses of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the run up to the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Citing various violations of the model code of conduct, and pointing towards how ECI has taken little action, the letter asks the President to tell ECI to “conduct itself in a manner where its independence, fairness, impartiality and efficiency are not questioned.”