Skip to main content

Majority white collar workers fear job loss as AI grows at CAGR of 25-35% in India

By Rajiv Shah 
An Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) study, "Labour-force Perception about AI: A Study on Indian White-collar Workers", has revealed that as many as 60% of white collar workers fear job loss as a result of artificial intelligence (IA) being introduced in Indian industry, while only 53% "hope" that new jobs will be created.
Based on a field survey of over 550 white-collar employees, detailed interviews of 31 business executives, and analysis of over 70,000 job vacancies in India from public data sources, the study finds, "The fear of job loss is the least common among senior and leadership-level employees, but significantly higher among early-career and mid-career-level employees."
Carried out under the auspices of the Brij Disa Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence of the IIM-A, the study says that 68% of white collar employees "believe AI will automate their jobs in the next five years", even as noting that entry-level and leadership-level employees "have the least hope of AI creating new jobs".
Pointing towards the type of changes that might take place because of AI, the study, quoting business executives, says, there is fear of "workforce reductions", including among "data entry operators, quality inspectors, demand forecasters, and language translators." Those impacted also include "quality control inspectors and demand planners, management information systems (MIS) managers, and IT support teams."
"Clerical and administrative roles involving data entry, documentation, and routine tasks appear particularly vulnerable to being automated by AI technologies", the study believes, adding, "Such experiences have stoked fears about job security in specific roles."
Such fears are taking shape, says the study, amidst the integration of AI technologies leading to "the creation of specialised job roles focused on topics such as visualisation, forecasting, natural language processing (NLP) experts, and prompt engineers."
Carried out by IIM-A scholars Prof Anindya Chakrabarti, Prof Aditya C Moses, Prof Ankur Sinha, Debjit Ghatak and Amita Todkar, and Boston Consulting Group's Deep Narayan Mukherjee as partner, study estimates that by 2035, AI will "contribute a staggering USD 967 billion to the Indian economy", as the "AI market in India is growing at a CAGR of 25-35% and is expected to reach USD 28 billion by 2030".
The authors say, "India’s growing population warrants AI-driven solutions within critical sectors like education, healthcare, and agriculture to address escalating societal needs", especially in view of the fact that "China+1 initiative’s revitalisation of the manufacturing sector presents opportunities to leverage AI for enhanced efficiency and competitiveness".
Given this framework, the study was necessitated, say the authors, because "the proliferation of AI has reignited the debate on potential 'technological unemployment' across various sectors of the economy", with researchers, technologists, and thought leaders postulating that "an escalating number of tasks traditionally performed by human labour will become automated as AI capabilities advance."
While there is also the view that "the productivity and innovation gains from automation will create new businesses and jobs", the authors believe,"The current study acknowledges that both sides have relevant points given the ‘never-before-seen’ situation and the emergent behaviour of AI’s impact on society." They add, this is because, already, "the impact of AI on the white-collar workforce is multifaceted."
Thus, according to the study, AI usage in the education sector is 74%, in information technology it is 66%, and in public administration 61%. "However, sectors like retail and trade (31%), infrastructure (38%), and finance and insurance (54%) are lagging behind the average", it asserts.
The authors find that in "education, public administration, healthcare, and manufacturing, the percentage of employees self-training is higher than that of employees trained by the organisation, showcasing a greater personal initiative."
In fact, in these sectors, "employees, as individuals, are taking the lead in AI adoption and training themselves compared to the organisations they work for", the study notes, adding, "Compared to 55% of employees using AI at the workplace, 62% of respondents stated to have used AI outside the workplace, and 58% agreed to have personally subscribed to (free or paid) AI-based tools."
The authors say, "52% of employees are self-training compared to 48% trained by organisations, signifying employee push for AI use", which suggests, the "employees are also strongly positive about AI’s impacts on performance and productivity. 72% of employees believe AI skills increase performance and efficiency at work, while 62% of employees believe AI increases productivity, and 59% believe AI complements their work."
Pointing out that "except for retail and trade employees, most employees use AI and believe it increases their productivity and performance", the study states, "58% of employees agree to have already upskilled in AI. 65% of employees want to learn AI skills. 70% of employees believe upskilling in AI is necessary for career growth.While 51% agree they need AI skills for their current job role, 70% are upskilling for future prospects."

Comments

Lenard Ace said…
Seeing 70% of employees upskill for future prospects highlights how vital tech knowledge has become. Those exploring white collar recruitment jobs will likely need to show both experience and a willingness to learn AI skills.

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.