Skip to main content

Worship practice of Hindu religion in official functions should be considered appropriate

By NS Venkataraman*
The new Indian parliament building was inaugurated with much fanfare, pomp and show by Prime Minister Modi befitting the occasion. While the magnificent building with several technological features was built in just over two years , the style and structure of the building has been acclaimed by millions of people who saw the inaugural programme. Those who saw this programme in person or in visual media could not miss the fact that the installation of Sengol ( Sceptre) was the hall mark of this elegant programme . In India, historically, Sengol is considered to be the symbol of justice and good governance.
Amongst vedic chants by Hindu priests, Prime Minister Modi performed Ganapathi Puja (devotional prayer) and prostrated before the Sengol. He then sought the blessings from the Hindu priests and walked in procession carrying the Sengol , while vedic mantras were chanted and he installed it in the right side of the speaker’s chair in the Parliament.
The discerning observers see the Sengol installation ceremony by Mr. Modi as a very significant event, indicating as to in which direction Mr. Modi would lead India in the coming years. After installing the Sengol, Mr. Modi delivered a 35 minutes talk with his usual emotional eloquence ,painting a very bright picture of future India and obviously indicating that this Sengol would remind constantly those in charge of governance about the need for the probity and honesty in governance and fair play to people in all levels of society.
While the habitual critics of Mr. Modi have criticized the Sengol installation ceremony, by and large, people of India have reacted with great enthusiasm and view the installed Sengol with respect and hope. The sworn critics of Mr. Modi have termed the inaugural function of new parliament house as per Hindu practices as anti secular act
In India today, the word secularism is a much abused and misused term, where anything done in the name of Hindu practices is termed not secular and any religious activities amongst other religions are termed secular. In other words , those spreading Hindu philosophy and way of life are deemed to be lacking in secular credentials. In Indian democracy , where vote bank politics has become the central theme during the elections, many political parties try to corner the votes of those belonging to minority religions by calling themselves as secular and progressive parties and at the same time decrying those who speak about the Hindu ethos.
In such circumstances, Mr. Modi has exhibited high level of courage of conviction by not concealing the fact that he is a Hindu in letter and spirit, even as he respects other religions. In the parliament inauguration programme after performing elaborate Hindu pujas , all the other religious representatives were given time to offer prayers as per the religious dictum.
In the last nine years after becoming the Prime Minister, there have been several occasions when Mr. Modi has done worship in Hindu temples in full public view and one of the most important events was Mr. Modi performing Puja , as per Hindu religious practice during the foundation laying ceremony of Ram Janma bhoomi temple. While such pujas were done in temples by Mr. Modi in the past, this is, perhaps, the first time that Mr. Modi has done Puja as per Hindu religious practice in a major official function for inaugurating new parliament building, extensively seen all over India and abroad.
The origin of Hindu religion is India and Hindu religion has been there in India for several thousands of years More than 75 % of Indians owe their allegiance to Hindu religion.
While in several countries , religious prayers are done during the official programmes just as praying with Holy Koran in Islamic countries and Holy Bible in Christian countries , such practice has not been followed in India in any major official function In Christian and Islamic countries too, there are many inhabitants and citizens who belong to other religions and they do not object to muslims and christians following the religious practice in official functions. If such practices are considered right in those countries , Mr. Modi following Hindu religious practice for inauguration of parliament in India is right too.
While India can continue to be a secular country allowing freedom for all religions, similar to several other democratic countries such as USA, Canada and Europe, adopting the worship practice of Hindu religion in official functions in India should be considered appropriate.
It is high time to recognise the fact that there is a grievance amongst many Hindus in India that they are being discriminated against by several government policy measures , while benefiting the minority religions in the name of secular principles. The immediate example is the Hindu temples being administered by the governments with considerable interference in day today affairs and even diverting the income of the Hindu temples to several other purposes. The mosque, churches and gurudwaras are not under the control of the government but left to be managed by the leaders of those religions. So many other examples can be readily cited.
It is high time that every Indian whether christian, muslim, sikh or buddhist recognize that India is essentially a country based ion Hindu ethos, even as people belonging to other religions are at total liberty to follow their religious dictums. Any objection to Mr. Modi following Hindu religious practices for inaugurating the new parliament is not appropriate . Mr. Modi has shown the way and blown out the unreal secularism phobia.
By installing Sengol that symbolizes honesty and probity in governance, Mr. Modi has brought the attention of the nation about high principles that should be the hallmark of fair governance. He has ensured that Sengol would all the time keep the focus of the country on marching forward with principles of truth and honesty in governance.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.