Skip to main content

Seeking to follow Gujarat 'model'? Proposed Tamil Nadu global investors' meet Jan 2024

Tamil Nadu chief minister MK Stalin
By NS Venkataraman* 
The practice of organizing global investor meet was started by the Gujarat government when Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of the state. He projected it as a novel idea, seeking to catch the imagination of the investors and the general public, with huge claims being made about investment proposals and Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).
Subsequently, most of the states in the country including Tamil Nadu, started following the Gujarat “model”, been announcing such investor conferences from time to time.
After having organized so many investor conferences by different states all over India, it is now high time to review whatever benefits gained during such conferences and whether they are commensurate with the efforts put forth and claims made and money spent.
It is also necessary to examine dispassionately whether these conferences have become extravaganza, mainly serving only the political interests of the chief minister and his party in the state.

Past conferences in Tamil Nadu

In 2015, a global investor conference was organized in Tamil Nadu with much fanfare and it was reported that around 5000 delegates from India and abroad attended the meet. It was claimed that around 100 MoUs were signed for an investment of around Rs 2.4 lakh crore.
Another investor meet in Tamil Nadu was organized in 2019, which was also said to have been attended by thousands of delegates from India and abroad and it was claimed that several MoUs were signed worth around Rs 3.4 lakh crore.
Now, yet another investor conference has been announced by the Tamil Nadu government that would take place in January 2024. It has been said that investors from around one hundred countries would be invited to participate in the conference.
What is noteworthy about these investor meet?
What is noteworthy is that while huge claims are made about the number of MoUs signed with thousands of crores of rupees of proposed investment, rarely subsequent announcements are made from time to time as to how many MoUs have really been converted into commissioned projects and how much of investment have been really made and how many direct and indirect employment was generated, as against the originally targeted figures by the government.
It is also necessary to consider the ground reality that some new projects have come up in Tamil Nadu which were not discussed during the investor meet and several projects discussed in the conference have not been set up and also a number of projects have been closed due to variety of reasons such as the massive Sterlite Copper in Tamil Nadu.
In the absence of the credible white paper from the government from time to time to enable the people to know the truth about the investment made , people are forced to guess and conjecture. There is a view of the experts is that only around 30% of the announced projects are under various stages of implementation.

Claims of Tamil Nadu government

The present Tamil Nadu Chief Minister announced in the state assembly that after his party came to power in 2021, 207 companies have signed MoUs for setting up projects amounting to investment of Rs 2.23 lakh crore.
A few months back, the Chief Minister visited Dubai to promote investment in state and claimed that MoUs have been signed for setting up projects in the state amounting to Rs 6,100 crore during his visit.
Recently, the Chief Minister has visited Singapore and Japan and said several MoUs have been signed during this visit for around Rs 3,233 crore, that would provide employment to over 5,000 people.
After signing MoUs amounting to thousands of crores, an impression is sought to be created as if the projects have happened
After reading the claims and announcements of the Chief Minister about the MoUs for investment proposals signed even before the global investor meet, the question arises as to where is any need for holding yet another global investor meet with pomp and show in January 2024? The so far signed MOUs are quite a good number ,if they would materialize.
What should be noted is that after signing MoUs on paper amounting to thousands of crore of rupees, an impression is sought to be created as if the projects have happened.
It is well known that the MoU is the preliminary stage of project proposal under consideration and it is not the be all and end all of the project. During the MoU stage, the investor is undecided but only inclined to view the project proposal favourably, if various parameters would meet its expectations.
After signing the MoU, prefeasibility report has to be prepared. If the contents would be favourable in the prefeasibility report then a detailed project report would be prepared, after which land acquisition has to be decided and financial closures of the project have to be ensured.
These stages are known as pre-investment study stage, which generally can take upto twelve months.
A number of proposals may be given up in the course of the prefeasibility study due to one reason or the other. Therefore, hailing the MoUs signed as a big achievement is not appropriate.

Investors' converences

In today’s world with extensive communication facility being available and India being a free country, all the plus and minus points of the state would be known to the potential investor all over the world . They would not choose to invest simply because of the invitation extended. As a matter of fact, all investors are all the time looking for investment opportunities and would seek to invest if they are convinced, even without this investor conference.
Whatever may be the sugar coating that a state government would do, always there are serious issues confronting the investors, and Tamil Nadu is no exception here. Investors look into political and administrative corruption, environmental activism, the law and order scenario. All this is a matter of high concern for the investors. Such concerns cannot be concealed at any investors’ conference.
Organising such investor meets are a costly affair, as chief ministers, several ministers and bureaucrats, even advisors, go around the world and organise expensive meetings to invite the prospective investors. When the delegates do come, they need to be accommodated and hospitality expenses would be considerable, apart from other substantial promotional expenses. Such expenses could be around Rs 100 crore. Is such huge expense justifiable?
Investor conferences end up largely as an event management affair, and turn out to be publicity campaigns.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Reducing emission? India among top nations whose coal as energy source going up

By NS Venkataraman*  The State of the Global Climate report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) confirmed that the year 2023 was the warmest year on record, with the global temperature of 1.4 degree celsius above pre-industrial 1850-1900 base line.

Lockdown 'total failure' of science more than of politics: Open letter on 4th anniversary

Counterview Desk  In an open letter to fellow academicians, scientists and medical practitioners in India, marking the fourth anniversary of India's lockdown (25 March 2024), the Managing Committee* of the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) has insisted on the need to "repair two years of immense damage to science".

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Attack on foreign students: Gujarat varsity's reputation, ranking at stake, say academics

Counterview Desk  Expressing anguish over the attack on international students in Gujarat University hostels, a letter claimed to have been signed by 122 current and former academics has asked the Gujarat Vice Chancellor, Dr Neerja Gupta, to provide emotional support to the attacked students and to ensure their physical safety.  

As double engine takes backseat in Odisha, BJP is pitted against 'firmly rooted' BJD

By Sudhansu R Das  BJP has got 25 years to build its party base in Odisha. After 25 years, it felt helpless and insecure to fight elections on its own strength. The party was almost crazy to have an alliance with the ruling BJD in Odisha.  Looking for alliance at the time of election shows that the party has not groomed its grassroots level workers into potential leaders.  The state BJP leaders woke up and convinced the Central leaders that they are capable of going solo; the alliance was stillborn. The question is can BJP defeat BJD which is firmly rooted in Odisha after launching piles of populist programs in the state.