Skip to main content

Generative AI as 'potent weapon and shield' in battle of political misinformation

By Haziq Jeelani* 

In the pulsating heart of the digital era, the political arena is ceaselessly molded by the swift and relentless flow of information. The line between fact and fiction often blurs, creating a nebulous landscape where truth and deceit intertwine. 
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has added a new dimension to this dynamic, wielding the power to both fuel and quell the spread of misinformation.

Pandora's box of generative AI

Generative AI, with its uncanny ability to craft realistic text, images, and videos, holds the potential to significantly amplify the problem of misinformation in politics. Deepfake technology, a subset of generative AI, can fabricate eerily convincing videos of politicians uttering words they never spoke or performing actions they never took, sowing seeds of discord and confusion among voters. 
Similarly, AI algorithms can generate counterfeit news articles or social media posts, meticulously tailored to specific audiences, potentially swaying public opinion and influencing the outcome of elections.
In the 2020 Gabonese presidential election, an AI-generated video of President Ali Bongo was circulated, in which he appeared to be in robust health despite having suffered a stroke. The video was later unmasked as a deepfake, raising alarm bells about the use of AI to manipulate public opinion during political campaigns. 
In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, AI was reportedly used to generate propaganda and counterfeit news stories that were then disseminated on social media platforms. These stories were designed to stoke political divisions and influence voter behavior.
AI-powered bots have been deployed to spread misinformation on social media platforms. For instance, during the Brexit referendum in the UK, automated bots were used to amplify certain viewpoints, creating an illusion of widespread support or opposition to Brexit. 
AI can also be used to analyze vast amounts of data on individuals' online behavior, enabling political campaigns to micro-target specific groups with tailored misinformation. This was a significant concern during the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the data of millions of Facebook users was used without consent to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Shield of machine learning against misinformation

On the flip side, machine learning, another branch of AI, can be a potent tool in the fight against misinformation. Advanced algorithms can be trained to detect and flag potential misinformation, helping to stem its spread.
Data of millions of Facebook users was used to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election
For instance, a recent study titled "Va ex ccine sentiment analysis using BERT + NBSVM and geo-spatial approaches" leverages a combination of BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and NBSVM (Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine) for sentiment analysis. This approach identifies and classifies people's feelings about vaccines, thereby providing useful insights to counter misinformation.
Several advanced algorithms and systems can be employed to prevent the spread of misinformation. Machine learning models can be trained on large datasets to recognize patterns associated with misinformation, such as certain phrasing or source reliability. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can be used to analyze the content of news articles or social media posts, identifying potential misinformation based on the language used. 
Moreover, the use of semi-supervised learning, as discussed in "A systematic literature review of cyber-security data repositories and performance assessment metrics for semi-supervised learning," can be beneficial in situations where only a few labels are necessary or available for building robust models.
In conclusion, while generative AI poses a significant challenge in the fight against misinformation in politics, machine learning offers a promising solution. By leveraging advanced algorithms and systems, it is possible to detect and counteract misinformation, ensuring that the political discourse remains grounded in fact rather than fiction.
---
*PhD student at Claremont Grad (USA), consults on AI. Twitter: @hazytalks

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."