Skip to main content

Generative AI as 'potent weapon and shield' in battle of political misinformation

By Haziq Jeelani* 

In the pulsating heart of the digital era, the political arena is ceaselessly molded by the swift and relentless flow of information. The line between fact and fiction often blurs, creating a nebulous landscape where truth and deceit intertwine. 
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has added a new dimension to this dynamic, wielding the power to both fuel and quell the spread of misinformation.

Pandora's box of generative AI

Generative AI, with its uncanny ability to craft realistic text, images, and videos, holds the potential to significantly amplify the problem of misinformation in politics. Deepfake technology, a subset of generative AI, can fabricate eerily convincing videos of politicians uttering words they never spoke or performing actions they never took, sowing seeds of discord and confusion among voters. 
Similarly, AI algorithms can generate counterfeit news articles or social media posts, meticulously tailored to specific audiences, potentially swaying public opinion and influencing the outcome of elections.
In the 2020 Gabonese presidential election, an AI-generated video of President Ali Bongo was circulated, in which he appeared to be in robust health despite having suffered a stroke. The video was later unmasked as a deepfake, raising alarm bells about the use of AI to manipulate public opinion during political campaigns. 
In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, AI was reportedly used to generate propaganda and counterfeit news stories that were then disseminated on social media platforms. These stories were designed to stoke political divisions and influence voter behavior.
AI-powered bots have been deployed to spread misinformation on social media platforms. For instance, during the Brexit referendum in the UK, automated bots were used to amplify certain viewpoints, creating an illusion of widespread support or opposition to Brexit. 
AI can also be used to analyze vast amounts of data on individuals' online behavior, enabling political campaigns to micro-target specific groups with tailored misinformation. This was a significant concern during the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the data of millions of Facebook users was used without consent to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Shield of machine learning against misinformation

On the flip side, machine learning, another branch of AI, can be a potent tool in the fight against misinformation. Advanced algorithms can be trained to detect and flag potential misinformation, helping to stem its spread.
Data of millions of Facebook users was used to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election
For instance, a recent study titled "Va ex ccine sentiment analysis using BERT + NBSVM and geo-spatial approaches" leverages a combination of BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and NBSVM (Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine) for sentiment analysis. This approach identifies and classifies people's feelings about vaccines, thereby providing useful insights to counter misinformation.
Several advanced algorithms and systems can be employed to prevent the spread of misinformation. Machine learning models can be trained on large datasets to recognize patterns associated with misinformation, such as certain phrasing or source reliability. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can be used to analyze the content of news articles or social media posts, identifying potential misinformation based on the language used. 
Moreover, the use of semi-supervised learning, as discussed in "A systematic literature review of cyber-security data repositories and performance assessment metrics for semi-supervised learning," can be beneficial in situations where only a few labels are necessary or available for building robust models.
In conclusion, while generative AI poses a significant challenge in the fight against misinformation in politics, machine learning offers a promising solution. By leveraging advanced algorithms and systems, it is possible to detect and counteract misinformation, ensuring that the political discourse remains grounded in fact rather than fiction.
---
*PhD student at Claremont Grad (USA), consults on AI. Twitter: @hazytalks

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson".