Govt's 'misleading' figures to Parliament: Corruption free J&K apple procurement?

By A Representative
Publicised as a measure to ensure better economic development in the newly formed union territory of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) and corruption-free procurement, there appears to be little clarity at the highest level on the apples bought J&K growers under the Market Intervention Scheme (MIS) that the Central and State/UT level governments claimed to have implemented through the National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (NAFED).
A senior Right to Information (RTI) activist Venkatesh Nayak of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative said, soon after the legislative changes downgrading J&K from a full-fledged State to a Union Territory (UT) came into effect, i.e. on November 1, 2019, he filed an RTI plea with the Department of Agriculture (DAC) seeking the information about the implementation of the apple MIS in J&K.
While the procurement target was fixed at 13,000 metric tonnes, the delayed reply received by Nayak from DAC on February 28, 2020 said, a total of 1,56,120.470 quintals (7,642 metric tonnes or MT) of apples were bought under the MIS during the 2019-20 season at a cost of Rs 69.55 crore.
It further said, a total of 1,054,169 boxes containing three grades of apples -- Delicious, American and Maharaji – were despatched during this season up to January 30, 2020 from five districts, namely, Anantnag, Srinagar, Sopore, Shopian and Kulgam.
Interestingly, in response to a question raised in the Lok Sabha on February 4, 2020, 24 days before the RTI reply was sent, the Government of India replied that it had purchased 15,769.38MT of apples at a cost of Rs 70.45 crore under the scheme!
Pointing towards the “huge discrepancy” in the figures tabled in Parliament and the reply given under RTI, Nayak said, interestingly, on November 12, 2019, the Government of India provided a figure of 7,940MT of apples were purchased under the MIS, though in February 2020, this came down to 7,642MT under RTI!
Yet another figure of the apple procurement data was given the Supreme Court of India in the Anuradha Bhasin case last year, under which it was claimed by the J&K government that NAFED had procured 8,960MT of apples during the season at a cost of Rs 38 crore under MIS.
“So, the Government of J&K claimed that NAFED had procured more apples than what Parliament was told in November 2019 and at just about 45% less cost than what I was informed in reply to my RTI application”, Nayak said in an email alert to Counterview.

Govt told Parliament it procured 15,769MT apples, but RTI reply says it was 7,642 MT, lower than last year's claim, 7,940MT

“The huge discrepancy in figures, including the cost of procurement, raises several questions about the credibility of claims being made before Parliament, the highest court of the land and under the RTI Act”, Nayak said, adding, “Two of my own contacts in J&K have revealed that many farmers had to watch their apple crop rot away because there were simply no vehicles to pick them up from orchards, thanks to the restrictions on vehicular movement imposed August 2019 onwards.”
“So”, said Nayak, “If the actual figure is in the range of 7,000-8,000 metric tonnes, the actual procurement has fallen way too short of the target of 13,000 metric tonnes set in September 2019, lending credibility to the claims of people in J&K that a large portion of their apple crop might have just rotted away this season.”
“If on the other hand, the figure of 15,769.38MT reported in the Lok Sabha this February is correct, DAC has provided a much lower and misleading figure under the RTI Act”, Nayak said, adding, in the process, what appears to have actually happened is, “the authorities have not only failed the growers in J&K but also the millions of under-nourished and hungry citizens, particularly mothers and children who could have been fed these fruits through the ICDS and mid-day-meal schemes at nominal procurement, transportation and handling cost.”

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog